The Project Gutenberg eBook of Signalling across space without wires, by Oliver J. Lodge

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

Title: Signalling across space without wires

Author: Oliver J. Lodge

Release Date: October 29, 2022 [eBook #69253]

Language: English

Produced by: deaurider and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive)

*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SIGNALLING ACROSS SPACE WITHOUT WIRES ***

SIGNALLING ACROSS SPACE
WITHOUT WIRES.

BEING A DESCRIPTION OF

THE WORK OF HERTZ
& HIS SUCCESSORS.

BY

PROF. OLIVER J. LODGE, F.R.S.

THIRD EDITION,
With Additional Remarks concerning the Application
to Telegraphy, and Later Developments.

LONDON:
“THE ELECTRICIAN” PRINTING AND PUBLISHING COMPANY,
LIMITED,
Salisbury Court, Fleet Street.

Copyright.

Works by Dr. O. J. LODGE.

Lightning Conductors and Lightning Guards. A Complete Treatise on the subject of Electric Discharges in general.

Pioneers of Science. A popular Illustrated History of the Early Astronomers and their Work up to Recent Times.

Modern Views of Electricity.

Elementary Mechanics.

Protection of Buildings from Lightning. Mann Lectures to the Society of Arts, 1888.

Secondary Batteries and the Electrical Storage of Energy. Cantor Lectures to the Society of Arts, 1883.

TABLE OF CONTENTS.

(The lines in italics which look like headings of paragraphs are really statements about experiments which were at that place shown.)

1. | Royal Institution Lecture on the Work |
of Hertz and some of his Successors:— | PAGES
Biographical Introduction | 1
Elementary Explanation about Electrical Radiation |
and Absorption and the Effect of Syntony | 3-8
Syntonic Leyden Jar Experiment | 6, 21
Side Observations on the Effect of Light |
on Electric Discharge | 9-12
Various Detectors of Radiation | 13-23
Physiological Non-Effect of Sufficiently Rapid Alternations | 17
Boltzmann Gap Detector—the Precursor of the Coherer | 18
Branly’s Observations (see also Appendix, page 95) | 20
Early Form of Coherer and of Branly Filings Tube | 21-23
Early Signalling over 40 or 60 yards | 24-25
Use of Telephone as Receiver | 26
Experiments showing Syntony | 27-28
Hypothesis concerning the Nature of Vision | 29-31
Summary of Various Detectors of Radiation | 30
Radiation Detected from extremely Weak Sparks, and by |
very compact Receiver with Collecting Wire | 32-34
Vacuum Filings Tube | 34
Effect of Metallic Enclosure | 35-38
Experiments on Reflection, Refraction, and Polarisation |
of Radiation | 39-42
Note about Electric Waves on Wires | 43
2. | Application of Hertz Waves and Coherer |
Signalling to Telegraphy | 45-48
Coherer Behaviour and Tommasina’s Experiment | 49
Single-Point Coherer | 55
General Remarks about Patent Law | 50
Attempts at Syntonic Telegraphy | 52-60
Syntonic Radiators and Receivers | 51-56
3. | Details of other Telegraphic Developments:— |
Popoff’s 1895 Demonstration | 60-62
Slaby’s Overland Experiments | 63-66
Marconi’s Recent Demonstration | 66-72
4. | A History of the Coherer Principle | 73-87
Professor Hughes’ Early Observations |
before Hertz or Branly | 88-94
Work of Monsieur Branly | 95-108
5. | Communications with respect to Coherer |
Phenomena on a Large Scale:— |
Professor Elihu Thomson | 109
Dr. Morton | 111
6. | Photo-Electric Researches of Drs. Elster |
| and Geitel | 115-126
7. | Photo-Electric Researches of Professor Righi | 127

[Pg 1]

# SIGNALLING THROUGH SPACE
WITHOUT WIRES.

## THE WORK OF HERTZ
AND
SOME OF HIS SUCCESSORS.

The following pages (up to page 42) are the Notes of a Lecture delivered by Dr. O. J. Lodge before the Royal Institution of Great Britain on Friday evening, June 1, 1894. These notes have been revised by Dr. Lodge, and prepared for publication in the form here presented. After page 42 an account is given of the later applications of Hertzian wave experiments to wireless telegraphy, and a series of Appendices are also given.

### Introductory.—1894.

The untimely end of a young and brilliant career cannot fail to strike a note of sadness and awaken a chord of sympathy in the hearts of his friends and fellow-workers. Of men thus cut down in the early prime of their powers there will occur to us here the names of Fresnel, of Carnot, of Clifford, and now of Hertz. His was a strenuous and favoured youth; he was surrounded from his birth with all the influences that go to make an accomplished man of science—accomplished both on the experimental and on the mathematical side. The front rank of scientific workers is weaker by his death, which occurred on January 1, 1894, the thirty-seventh year of his life. Yet did he not go till he had effected an achievement which will hand his name down to posterity as the founder of an epoch in experimental physics. [Pg 2]

In mathematical and speculative physics others had sown the seed. It was sown by Faraday, it was sown by Thomson and by Stokes, by Weber also doubtless, and by Helmholtz; but in this particular department it was sown by none more fruitfully and plentifully than by Clerk Maxwell. Of the seed thus sown Hertz reaped the fruits. Through his experimental discovery, Germany awoke to the truth of Clerk Maxwell’s theory of light, of light and electricity combined, and the able army of workers in that country (not forgetting some in Switzerland, France, and Ireland) have done most of the gleaning after Hertz.

This is the work of Hertz which is best known, the work which brought him immediate fame. It is not always that public notice is so well justified. The popular instinct is generous and trustful, and it is apt to be misled. The scientific eminence accorded to a few energetic persons by popular estimate is more or less amusing to those working on the same lines. In the case of Hertz no such mistake has been made. His name is not over well-known, and his work is immensely greater in every way than that of several who have made more noise.

His best known discovery is by no means his only one, and no less than eighteen Papers were contributed to German periodicals by him, in addition to the papers incorporated in his now well-known book on electric waves.

In closing these introductory and personal remarks, I should like to say that the enthusiastic admiration for Hertz’s spirit and character felt and expressed by students and workers who came into contact with him is not easily to be exaggerated. Never was a man more painfully anxious to avoid wounding the susceptibilities of others; and he was accustomed to deprecate the prominence given to him by speakers and writers in this country, lest it might seem to exalt him unduly above other and older workers among his own sensitive countrymen.

Speaking of the other great workers in physics in Germany, it is not out of place to record the sorrow with which we have heard of the recent death of Dr. August Kundt, Professor in the University of Berlin, successor to Von Helmholtz in that capacity. [Pg 3]

When I consented to discourse on the work of Hertz, my intention was to repeat some of his actual experiments, and especially to demonstrate his less-known discoveries and observations. But the fascination exerted upon me by electric oscillation experiments, when I, too, was independently working at them in the spring of 1888,[1] resumed its hold, and my lecture will accordingly consist of experimental demonstrations of the outcome of Hertz’s work rather than any precise repetition of portions of that work itself.

In case a minority of my audience are in the predicament of not knowing anything about the subject, a five minutes’ explanatory prelude may be permitted; and the simplest way will be for me hastily to summarise our knowledge of the subject before the era of Hertz.

Fig. 1.—Oscillations of Dumb-bell Hertz Vibrator
(after Bjerknes).

Just as a pebble thrown into a pond excites surface ripples, which can heave up and down floating straws under which they pass, so a struck bell or tuning fork emits energy into the air in the form of what are called sound waves, and this radiant energy is able to set up vibrations in other suitable elastic bodies.

If the body receiving them has its natural or free vibrations violently damped, so that when left to itself it speedily returns to rest (Fig. 1), then it can respond fully to notes of almost any pitch. This is the case with your ears and the tones of my voice. Tones must be exceedingly shrill before they cease to excite the ear at all. [Pg 4]

If, on the other hand, the receiving body has a persistent period of vibration, continuing in motion long after it is left to itself (Fig. 2) like another tuning fork or bell, for instance, then far more facility of response exists, but great accuracy of tuning is necessary if it is to be fully called out; for if the receiver is not thus accurately syntonised with the source, it fails more or less completely to resound.

Fig. 2.—Oscillation of Ring-shaped Hertz Resonator
excited by Syntonic Vibrator (after Bjerknes).

Fig. 3.—Oscillation of Ring Resonator not quite syntonic with Radiator.
(For method of obtaining these curves see Fig. 14.)

Conversely, if the source is a persistent vibrator, correct tuning is essential, or it will destroy at one moment (Fig. 3) motion which it originated the previous moment. Whereas, if it is a dead-beat or strongly-damped exciter, almost anything will respond equally well or equally ill to it.

What I have said of sounding bodies is true of all vibrators in a medium competent to transmit waves. Now a sending telephone or a microphone, when spoken to, emits waves into the ether, and this radiant energy is likewise able to set up vibration in suitable bodies. But we have no delicate means of directly detecting these electrical or etherial waves; and if they are to produce a perceptible effect at a distance, they must be confined, as by a speaking-tube, prevented from spreading, and concentrated on the distant receiver. [Pg 5]

This is the function of the telegraph wire; it is to the ether what a speaking-tube is to air. A metal wire in air (in function, not in details of analogy) is like a long hollow cavity surrounded by nearly rigid but slightly elastic walls.

### Sphere charged from Electrophorus.

Furthermore, any conductor electrically charged or discharged with sufficient suddenness must emit electrical waves into the ether, because the charge given to it will not settle down instantly, but will surge to and fro several times first; and these surgings or electric oscillations must, according to Maxwell, start waves in the ether, because at the end of each half-swing they cause electrostatic, and at the middle of each half-swing they cause electromagnetic effects, and the rapid alternation from one of these modes of energy to the other constitutes etherial waves.[2] If a wire is handy they will run along it, and may be felt a long way off. If no wire exists they will spread out like sound from a bell, or light from a spark, and their intensity will decrease according to the inverse square of the distance.

Maxwell and his followers well knew that there would be such waves; they knew the rate at which they would go, they knew that they would go slower in glass and water than in air, they knew that they would curl round sharp edges, that they would be partly absorbed but mainly reflected by conductors, that if turned back upon themselves they would produce the phenomena of stationary waves, or interference, or nodes and loops; it was known how to calculate the length of such waves, and even how to produce them of any required or predetermined wave length from 1,000 miles to a foot. Other things were known about them which would take too long to enumerate; any homogeneous insulator would transmit them, would refract or concentrate them if it were of suitable shape, would reflect none of a particular mode of vibration at a certain angle, and so on, and so on. [Pg 6]

All this was known, I say, known with varying degrees of confidence; but by some known with as great confidence as, perhaps even more confidence than, is legitimate before the actuality of experimental verification.

Hertz supplied the verification. He inserted suitable conductors in the path of such waves, conductors adapted for the occurrence in them of induced electric oscillations, and to the surprise of everyone, himself doubtless included, he found that the secondary electric surgings thus excited were strong enough to display themselves by minute electric sparks.

Fig. 4.—Experiment with Syntonic Leyden Jars
(cf. page 21).

### Syntonic Leyden Jars.

I shall show this in a form which requires great precision of tuning or syntony, both emitter and receiver being persistently vibrating things giving some 30 or 40 swings before damping has a serious effect. I take two Leyden jars with circuits about a yard in diameter, and situated about two yards apart (Fig. 4). I charge and discharge one jar, and observe that the surgings set up in the other can cause it to overflow if it is syntonised with the first.[3]

[Pg 7] A closed circuit such as this is a feeble radiator and a feeble absorber, so it is not adapted for action at a distance. In fact, I doubt whether it will visibly act at a range beyond the ¼λ at which true radiation of broken-off energy occurs. If the coatings of the jar are separated to a greater distance, so that the dielectric is more exposed, it radiates better; because in true radiation the electrostatic and the magnetic energies must be equal, whereas in a ring circuit the magnetic energy predominates. By separating the coats of the jar as far as possible we get a typical Hertz vibrator (Fig. 5), whose dielectric extends out into the room, and thus radiates very powerfully.

Fig. 5.— Standard Hertz Radiator.

### Ordinary Size Hertz Vibrator.

In consequence of its radiation of energy, its vibrations are rapidly damped, and it only gives some three or four good strong swings (Fig. 1). Hence it follows that it has a wide range of excitation; i.e., it can excite sparks in conductors barely at all in tune with it.

The two conditions, conspicuous energy of radiation and persistent vibration electrically produced, are at present incompatible. Whenever these two conditions coexist, considerable power or activity will, of course, be necessary in the source of energy. At present they only coexist in the sun and other stars, in the electric arc, and in furnaces.

### Two Circular Vibrators Sparking in sympathy.

The receiver Hertz used was chiefly a circular resonator (Fig. 6), not a good absorber but a persistent vibrator, well adapted for picking up disturbances of precise and measurable wave length. Its mode of vibration when excited by emitter in tune with it is depicted in Fig. 2. I find that the circular resonators can act as senders too; here is one exciting quite long sparks in a second one. [Pg 8]

Electric Syntony.—That was his discovery, but he did not stop there. He at once proceeded to apply his discovery to the verification of what had already been predicted about the waves, and by laborious and difficult interference experiments he ascertained that the previously calculated length of the waves was thoroughly borne out by fact. These interference experiments in free space are his greatest achievement.

Fig. 6.—Circular Resonator.
(The knobs ought to nearly touch each other.)

Fig. 6a.—Any circular Resonator can be used as a sender by bringing its knobs near the sparking knobs of a coil; but a simple arrangement is to take two semi-circles, as in above figure, and make them the coil terminals. The capacity of the cut ends can be varied, and the period thereby lengthened, by expanding them into plates.

He worked out every detail of the theory splendidly, separately analysing the electric and the magnetic oscillation, using language not always such as we should use now, but himself growing in theoretic insight through the medium of what would have been to most physicists a confusing maze of troublesome facts, and disentangling all their main relations most harmoniously. [Pg 9]

### Holtz Machine, A and B Sparks;
Glass and Quartz Panes in Screen.

While Hertz was observing sparks such as these, the primary or exciting spark and the secondary or excited one, he observed as a bye issue that the secondary spark occurred more easily if the light from the primary fell upon its knobs. He examined this new influence of light in many ways, and showed that although spark light and electric brush light were peculiarly effective, any source of light that gave very ultra-violet rays produced the same result.

Fig. 7.— Experiment arranged to show effect on one spark of light from another. The B spark occurs more easily when it can see the A spark through the window, unless the window is glazed with glass. A quartz pane transmits the effect: glass cuts it off.

The above figure represents my way of showing the experiment. It will be observed that with this arrangement the B knobs are at the same potential up to the instant of the flash, and in that case the ultra-violet portion of the light of the A spark assists the occurrence of the B spark. But it is interesting to note what Elster and Geitel have found (see Appendix IV., Fig. 59), that if the B knobs were subjected to steady strain instead of to [Pg 10] impulsive rush—e.g., if they were connected to the inner coats of the jars instead of the outer coatings—that then the effect of ultra-violet light on either spark gap would exert a deterrent influence, so that the spark would probably occur at the other, or non-illuminated gap. With the altered connections it is, of course, not feasible to illuminate one spark by the light of the other; the sparks are then alternative, not successive.

Wiedemann and Ebert, and a number of experimenters, have repeated and extended this discovery, proving that it is the cathode knob on which illumination takes effect; and Hallwachs and Righi made the important observation, which Elster and Geitel, Stoletow, Branly, and others have extended, that a freshly-polished zinc or other oxidisable surface, if charged negatively, is gradually discharged by ultra-violet light.

Fig. 8.— Zinc Rod in Arc Light, protected by Glass Screen. The lenses are of quartz, but there is no need for any lenses in this experiment; leakage of electricity begins directly the glass plate is withdrawn.

It is easy to fail in reproducing this experimental result if the right conditions are not satisfied; but if they are it is absurdly easy, and the thing might have been observed nearly a century ago.

### Zinc discharging Negative Electricity in Light;
Gold Leaf Electroscope;
Glass and Quartz Panes;
Quartz Prism.

Take a piece of zinc, clean it with emery paper, connect it to a gold [Pg 11] leaf electroscope, and expose it to an arc lamp. (Fig. 8). If charged positively nothing appears to happen, the action is very slow; but a negative charge leaks away in a few seconds if the light is bright. Any source of light rich in ultra-violet rays will do; the light from a spark is perhaps most powerful of all. A pane of glass cuts off all the action; so does atmospheric air in sufficient thickness (at any rate, town air), hence sunlight is not powerful. A pane of quartz transmits the action almost undiminished, but fluorspar may be more transparent still. Condensing the arc rays with a quartz lens and analysing them with a quartz prism or reflection grating, we find that the most effective part of the light is high up in the ultra-violet, surprisingly far beyond the limits of the visible spectrum[4] (Fig. 9, next page).

[Pg 12] This is rather a digression, but I have taken some pains to show it properly because of the interest betrayed by Lord Kelvin on this matter, and the caution which he felt about accepting the results of the Continental experimenters too hastily.

It is probably a chemical phenomenon, and I am disposed to express it as a modification of the Volta contact effect[5] with illumination.

Fig. 9.— Zinc Rod discharging Negative Electricity in the very Ultra-violet Light of a Spectrum formed by a Quartz Train. The best discharging light is found far beyond the limits of the visible spectrum.

Return now to the Hertz vibrator, or Leyden jar with its coatings well separated, so that we can get into its electric as well as its magnetic field. Here is a great one giving waves 30 metres long, radiating while it lasts with an activity of 100 h.p., and making ten million complete electric vibrations per second. It is made of four large copper sheets soldered together two and two, strung up by thin rope to a gallery, and each pair connected with the other by several yards of No. 0 pure copper rod, interrupted by a pair of sparking knobs (Fig. 10). [Pg 13]

### Large Hertz Vibrator in action; Abel’s Fuse Detector;
Vacuum Tube Detector; Striking of an Arc.

Its great radiating power damps it down very rapidly, so that it does not make above two or three swings; but nevertheless, each time it is excited, sparks can be drawn from most of the reasonably elongated conductors in the theatre of this Institution, and indeed from wire fencing and iron roofs outside this building.

A suitably situated gas leak can be ignited by these induced sparks. An Abel’s fuse connecting the water pipes with the gas pipes will blow off; vacuum tubes connected to nothing will glow (this fact has been familiar to all who have worked with Hertz waves since 1889), electric leads, if anywhere near each other, as they are in some incandescent lamp-holders, may spark across to each other, thus striking an arc and blowing their fuses. This blowing of fuses by electric radiation frequently happened at Liverpool till the suspensions of the theatre lamps were altered. They had at first been held in position by wire guides, which served as collectors of the Hertz waves or impulses.

Fig. 10.— Hertz Oscillator on reduced scale,
⅒th inch to a foot.

The striking of an arc by the little reverberating sparks between two lamp-carbons connected with the 100-volt mains I incidentally now demonstrate. An arc is started directly the large Hertz vibrator is excited at a distance.

There are some who think that lightning flashes can do none of these secondary things. They are mistaken.

### Specimens of Emitters and Receivers.

On the table are specimens of various emitters and receivers such as have been used by different people; the orthodox Hertz radiator (Fig. 5), and the orthodox Hertz receivers:—A circular ring (Fig. 6) for interference experiments, because it is but little damped, and a straight wire for receiving at a distance, because it is a much better absorber. Beside these are the spheres and ellipsoids (or elliptical plates), which I have myself introduced and mainly used (Fig. 19), [Pg 14] because they are powerful radiators and absorbers, and because their theory has been worked out by Horace Lamb and J. J. Thomson. Also dumb-bells (Fig. 11) without air gap, which must be excited by a positive spark at one end and a negative spark at the other, and many other shapes, the most recent of mine being the inside of a hollow cylinder with sparks at ends of a diameter (Fig. 12); this being a feeble radiator, but a very persistent vibrator,[6] and, therefore, well adapted for interference and diffraction experiments. But, indeed, spheres can be made to vibrate longer than usual by putting them into copper hats or enclosures, in which an aperture of varying size can be made to let the waves out (Figs. 20 and 21).

Fig. 11.— A Small Dumb-bell Form of Radiator for Impulsive Rush.

Fig. 12.— Dr. Lodge’s Hollow Cylindrical Radiator, arranged horizontally against the outside of a Metal-lined Box containing the Spark-producing Apparatus. Half natural size. Emitting 3 in. waves.

Many of these senders will do for receivers too, giving off sparks to other insulated bodies or to earth; but besides the Hertz type of receiver, many other detectors of radiation have been employed. Vacuum tubes can be used, either directly or on the trigger principle, as by Zehnder (Fig. 13),[7] the resonator spark precipitating a discharge [Pg 15] from some auxiliary battery or source of energy, and so making a feeble disturbance very visible. Explosives may be used for the same purpose, either in the form of mixed water-gases or in the form of an Abel’s fuse. FitzGerald found that a tremendously sensitive galvanometer could indicate that a feeble spark had passed, by reason of the consequent disturbance of electrical equilibrium which settled down again through the galvanometer.[8] This was the method he used in this theatre four years ago. Blyth used a one sided electrometer, and V. Bjerknes has greatly developed this method (Fig. 14), abolishing the need for a spark, and making the electrometer metrical, integrating and satisfactory.[9] With this detector many measurements have been made at Bonn by Bjerknes, Yule, Barton and others on waves concentrated and kept from space dissipation by guiding wires.

Fig. 13.— Zehnder’s Trigger Tube. Half Natural Size. The two right-hand terminals, close together, are attached to the Hertz receiver; another pair of terminals are connected to some source just not able to make the tube glow until the scintilla occurs and makes the gas more conducting—as observed by Schuster and others.

Mr. Boys has experimented on the mechanical force exerted by electrical surgings, and Hertz also made observations of the same kind.

### Various Detectors.

Going back to older methods of detecting electrical radiation, we have, most important of all, a discovery made long before man existed, by a creature that developed a sensitive cavity on its skin; a creature which never so much as had a name to be remembered by (though perhaps we now call it trilobite). Then, in recent times we recall the [Pg 16] photographic plate and the thermopile, with its modification, the radiomicrometer; also the so-called bolometer, or otherwise-known Siemens’ pyrometer, applied to astronomy by Langley, and applied to the detection of electric waves in wires by Rubens and Ritter and Paalzow and Arons. The thermal junction was applied to the same purpose by Kolacek, D. E. Jones and others.

And, before all these, the late Mr. Gregory, of Cooper’s Hill, made his singularly sensitive expansion meter, whereby waves in free space could be detected by the minute rise of temperature they caused in a platinum wire, a kind of early and sensitive form of Cardew voltmeter.

Fig. 14.— Bjerknes’ Apparatus, showing (1) a Hertz vibrator connected to an induction coil; (2) a nearly closed circuit receiver properly tuned with the vibrator; and (3) a one sided electrometer for inserting in the air gap of 2. The receiver is not provided with knobs, as shown, but its open circuit is terminated by the quadrants of the electrometer, which is shown on an enlarged scale alongside. The needle is at zero potential and is attracted by both quadrants. By calculation from the indications of this electrometer Bjerknes plotted the curves 1, 2 and 3 on pages 4 and 5. Fig. 1 represents the oscillations of the primary vibrator, rapidly damped by radiation of energy. Fig. 2 represents the vibrations thereby set up in the resonating circuit when the two are accurately in tune; and which persist for many swings. Fig. 3 shows the vibrations excited in the same circuit when slightly out of tune with the exciter. A receiver of this kind makes many swings before it is seriously damped, though the open plate radiator does not.

Going back to the physiological method of detecting surgings, Hertz tried the frog’s leg nerve-muscle preparation, which to the steadier types of electrical stimulus is so surpassingly sensitive, and to which we owe the discovery of current electricity. But he failed to get any [Pg 17] result. Ritter has succeeded; but, in my experience, failure is the normal and proper result. Working with my colleague, Prof. Gotch, at Liverpool, I too have tried the nerve and muscle preparation of the frog (Fig. 15), and we find that an excessively violent stimulus of a rapidly alternating character, if pure and unaccompanied by secondary actions, produces no effect—no stimulating effect, that is—even though the voltage is so high that sparks are ready to jump between the needles in direct contact with the nerve.

All that such oscillations do, if continued, is to produce a temporary paralysis or fatigue of the nerve, so that it is unable to transmit the nerve impulses evoked by other stimuli, from which paralysis it recovers readily enough in course of time.

Fig. 15.— Experiment of Gotch and Lodge on the physiological effect of rapid pure electric alternations. Nerve-muscle preparation, with four needles, or else non-polarisable electrodes applied to the nerve. C and D are the terminals of a rapidly-alternating electric current from a conductor at zero potential (namely, the terminals of a derived circuit from a wire connecting the outer coats of a pair of discharging Leyden jars), while A and B are the terminals of an ordinary very weak galvanic or induction coil stimulus only just sufficient to make the muscle twitch. The C D terminals do not stimulate the nerve, though at very high alternative potentials, but they gradually and temporarily paralyse it, so that the test terminals A B produce no effect for a time.

This has been expected from experiments on human beings, such experiments as Tesla’s and those of d’Arsonval. But an entire animal is not at all a satisfactory instrument wherewith to attack the question; its nerves are so embedded in conducting tissues that it may easily be doubted whether the alternating type of stimulus ever reaches them at all. By dissecting out a nerve and muscle from a deceased frog after the historic manner of physiologists, and applying the stimulus direct to the nerve, at the same time as some other well known ¹/₁₀₀th a volt stimulus is applied to another part of the same nerve further from the muscle, it can be shown that rapid electric alternations, if entirely unaccompanied by static charge or by resultant algebraic electric transmission, evoke no excitatory response until they are so violent as to give rise to secondary effects such as heat or mechanical shock. [Pg 18] Yet, notwithstanding this inaction, they gradually and slowly exert a paralysing or obstructive action on the portion of the nerve to which they are applied, so that the nerve impulse excited by the feeble just perceptible ¹/₁₀₀th-volts stimulus above is gradually throttled on its way down to the muscle, and remains so throttled for a time varying from a few minutes to an hour after the cessation of the violence. [I did not show this experiment at the lecture.]

### Air Gap and Electroscope charged by Glass Rod and
discharged by the Wave Impulse from a moderately
distant Sphere excited by Coil.

Fig. 16.— Air gap for Electroscope. Natural size. The bottom plate is connected to, and represents, the cap of an electroscope; the “knob” above it, mentioned in text, is the polished end of the screw, whose terminal is connected with the case of the instrument or “earth.” The electroscope being charged to the verge of overflow, the impact of weak electric waves collected by a bit of wire sticking up from the left-hand binding screw precipitates the collapse of the leaves.

Among trigger methods of detecting electric radiation, I have spoken of the Zehnder vacuum tubes; another method is one used by Boltzmann.[10] A pile of several hundred volts is on the verge of charging an electroscope through an air gap just too wide to break down. Very slight electric surgings precipitate the discharge across the gap, and the leaves diverge. I show this in a modified and simple form. On the cap of an electroscope is placed a highly polished knob or rounded end connected to the sole, and just not touching the cap, or, rather, just not touching a plate connected with the cap (Fig. 16), the distance [Pg 19] between knob and plate being almost infinitesimal, such a distance as is appreciated in spherometry. Such an electroscope overflows suddenly and completely with any gentle rise of potential. Bring excited glass near it, the leaves diverge gradually and then suddenly collapse, because the air space snaps: remove the glass, and they rediverge with negative electricity; the knob above the cap being then charged positively, and to the verge of sparking. In this condition any electrical waves, collected if weak by a foot or so of wire projecting from the cap, will discharge the electroscope by exciting surgings in the wire, and so breaking down the air gap. The chief interest about this experiment seems to me the extremely definite dielectric strength of so infinitesimal an air space. Moreover, it is a detector for Hertz waves that might have been used last century; it might have been used by Benjamin Franklin.

For to excite them no coil or anything complicated is necessary; it is sufficient to flick a metal sphere or cylinder with a silk handkerchief and then discharge it with a well-polished knob. If it is not well polished the discharge is comparatively gradual, and the vibrations are weak; the more polished are the sides of an air gap, the more sudden is the collapse and the more vigorous the consequent radiation, especially the radiation of high frequency, the higher harmonics of the disturbance.

For delicate experiments it is sometimes well to repolish the knobs every hour or so. For metrical experiments it is often better to let the knobs get into a less efficient but more permanent state. This is true of all senders or radiators. For the generation of the, so to speak, “infra-red” long-period Hertz waves any knobs will do, but to generate the “ultra-violet” short-period waves high polish is essential.

### Microphonic Detectors.

Receivers or detectors, which for the present I temporarily call microphonic, are liable to respond best to the more rapid vibrations. Their sensitiveness is to me surprising, though of course it does not approach the sensitiveness of the eye; at the same time I am by no means sure that the eye differs from them in kind. It is these detectors that I wish specially to bring to your notice. [Pg 20]

Prof. Minchin, whose long and patient work in connection with photo-electricity is now becoming known, and who has devised an instrument more sensitive to radiation than even Boys’ radiomicrometer, in that it responds to the radiation of a star while the radiomicrometer does not, found some years ago that some of his light-excitable cells lost their sensitiveness capriciously on tapping, and later he found that they frequently regained it again while Mr. Gregory’s Hertz-wave experiments were going on in the same room.

These “impulsion cells,” as he terms them, are troublesome things for ordinary persons to make and work with—at least I have never presumed to try—but in Mr. Minchin’s hands they are surprisingly sensitive to electric waves.[11]

The sensitiveness of selenium to light is known to everyone, and Mr. Shelford Bidwell has made experiments on the variations of conductivity exhibited by a mixture of sulphur and carbon.

Nearly four years ago M. Edouard Branly found that a burnished coat of porphyrised copper spread on glass or ebonite, diminished its resistance enormously, from some millions to some hundreds of ohms, when it was exposed to the neighbourhood, even the distant neighbourhood, of Leyden jar or coil sparks. He likewise found that a tube of metallic filings behaved similarly, and that both recovered their original resistance on shaking or tapping. Mr. Croft exhibited this fact recently at the Physical Society. M. Branly also made pastes and solid rods of filings, in Canada balsam and in sulphur, and found them likewise sensitive.[12]

With me the matter arose somewhat differently, as an outcome of the air gap detector employed with an electroscope by Boltzmann (Fig. 16). For I had observed in 1889 that two knobs sufficiently close together, far too close to stand any voltage such as an electroscope can show, could, when a spark passed between them, actually cohere; conducting an ordinary bell-ringing current if a single voltaic cell was in circuit; and, if there were no such cell, exhibiting an electromotive force of [Pg 21] their own sufficient to disturb a low resistance galvanometer vigorously, and sometimes requiring a faintly perceptible amount of force to detach them. The experiment was described to the Institution of Electrical Engineers in 1890,[13] and Prof. Hughes said he had observed the same thing.

Fig. 16a.— Receiver in Syntonic Jar Experiment,
with Knob Coherer and Tapper-back (cf. Fig. 4).

The experiment of the syntonic Leyden jars can be conveniently shown with the double-knob or 1889 coherer. The pair of knobs are arranged to connect the coatings of the receiving jar (a large condenser being interposed to prevent their completing a purely metallic circuit), and in circuit with them is a battery and a bell. Every time the receiving jar responds syntonically to the electric vibration of the other jar, the knobs cohere (if properly adjusted) and the bell rings. If the bell is free in air it continues ringing until the knobs are gently tapped asunder; but if the bell stands on the same table as the knobs, especially if it rests one foot on the actual stand, then its first stroke taps them back instantly and automatically, and so every [Pg 22] discharge of the sending jar is signalled by a single stroke of the bell. Here we have in essence a system of very distinctly syntonic telegraphy, for the jars and their circuits must be accurately tuned together, if there is to be any response. A very little error in tuning, easily made by altering the position of the slider (Fig. 4), will make them quite unresponsive, unless the distance between them is reduced.

Fig. 17.— Early Form of Coherer, consisting of a spiral of thin iron wire mounted on an adjustable spindle and an aluminium plate. When the lever is moved clockwise the tip of the iron wire presses gently against the aluminium plate, whose end is bent at right angles and passed through into the hollow circular wooden box, of which the upper figure shows the top and general appearance, and the lower figure shows the inside.

At the maximum distance of response the tuning required is excessively sharp. But, certainly, for these closed and durably-vibrating circuits, the distance of response is small, as has been said before. Fig. 16a shows the syntonic Leyden jar experiment arranged with the double knob coherer, instead of with the spark gap of Fig. 4.

### Coherer in open, responding to Feeble Stimuli:—
Small Sphere, Gas-lighter, Distant Sphere, Electrophorus.

Well, this arrangement, which I call a coherer, is the most astonishingly sensitive detector of Hertz waves. It differs from an [Pg 23] actual air gap in that the insulating film is not really insulating; the film breaks down not only much more easily, but also in a less discontinuous and more permanent manner, than an air gap. Branly’s tube of filings, a series of bad contacts, clearly works on the same plan; and though a tube of filings is by no means so sensitive, yet it is in many respects easier to work with, and except for very feeble stimuli, is more metrical. If the filings used are coarse, say turnings or borings, the tube approximates to a single coherer; if they are fine, it has a larger range of sensibility. In every case what these receivers feel are sudden jerks of current; smooth sinuous vibrations are ineffective. They seem to me to respond best to waves a few inches long, but doubtless that is determined chiefly by the dimensions of some conductor with which they happen to be associated. (Figs. 17 and 18.)

Fig. 18.— Early Form of Iron Borings Tube. One-half natural size, with solid brass cylinder terminals in each end of the tube, making contact with the borings.

### Experiment showing Filings Tube responding to Sphere, to Electrophorus, and to a Quasi-“Spark” from the Discharge of an ordinary Gold-leaf Electroscope.

I picture the action as follows: Suppose two fairly clean pieces of metal in light contact—say two pieces of brass or of iron—connected to a single voltaic cell; a film of what may be called oxide intervenes between the surfaces so that only an insignificant current is allowed to pass, because a volt or two is insufficient to break down the insulating film, except perhaps at one or two atoms.[14] If the film is not permitted to conduct at all, it is not very sensitive; the most sensitive condition is attained when an infinitesimal current passes, strong enough just to show on a moderate galvanometer. [Pg 24]

Now let the slightest surging occur, say by reason of a sphere being charged and discharged at a distance of forty yards; the film at once breaks down, perhaps not completely—that is a question of intensity—but permanently. As I imagine, more molecules get within each other’s range, incipient cohesion sets in and the momentary electric quiver acts somewhat like a flux. It is a singular variety of electric welding. A stronger stimulus enables more molecules to hold on, the process is surprisingly metrical; and as far as I roughly know at present, the change of resistance is proportional to the energy of the electric radiation, from a source of given frequency.

It is to be specially noted that a battery current is not needed to effect the cohesion, only to demonstrate it. The battery can be applied after the spark has occurred, and the resistance will be found changed as much as if the battery had been on all the time.

The incipient cohesion electrically caused can be mechanically destroyed. Sound vibrations, or any other feeble mechanical disturbances, such as scratches or taps, are well adapted to restore the contact to its original high resistance sensitive condition. The more feeble the electrical disturbance the slighter is the corresponding mechanical stimulus needed for restoration. When working with the radiating sphere (Fig. 19) at a distance of forty yards out of window, I could not for this reason shout to my assistant to cause him to press the key of the coil and make a spark, but I showed him a duster instead, this being a silent signal which had no disturbing effect on the coherer or tube of filings. I mention 40 yards, because that was one of the first outdoor experiments; but I should think that something more like half-a-mile was nearer the limit of sensitiveness for this particular apparatus as then arranged. However, this is a rash [Pg 25] statement not at present verified.[15] At 40 or 60 yards the exciting spark could be distinctly heard, and it was interesting to watch the spot of light begin its long excursion and actually travel a distance of 2 in. or 3 in. before the sound arrived. This experiment proved definitely enough that the efficient cause travelled quicker than sound, and disposed completely of any sceptical doubts as to sound waves being, perhaps, the real cause of the phenomenon. Signals were obtained across the full width of the college quadrangle, and later, with larger apparatus, between the college tower and another high building half-a-mile away.

Fig. 19.— Radiator used in the library of the Royal Institution, exciting the Coherer (Fig. 17) on the lecture table in the Theatre. I also used a radiator with two or with three large spheres between two knobs, and described it in Nature, Vol. 41, p. 462, 1890. This is the radiator which Prof. Righi has improved and made in a compact form with oil between the two middle spheres.

Invariably, when the receiver is in good condition, sound or other mechanical disturbance acts one way, viz., in the direction of increasing resistance, while electrical radiation or jerks act the other way, decreasing it. While getting the receiver into condition, or when it is getting out of order, vibrations and sometimes electric [Pg 26] discharges act irregularly; and an occasional good shaking does the filings good. I have taken rough measurements of the resistance by the simple process of restoring the original galvanometer deflection by adding or removing resistance coils. A half-inch tube, 8 in. long, of selected iron turnings (Fig. 18) had a resistance of 2,500 ohms in the sensitive state. A feeble stimulus, caused by a distant electrophorus spark, brought it down 400 ohms. A rather stronger one reduced it by 500 and 600, while a trace of spark given to a point of the circuit itself ran it down 1,400 ohms.

This is only to give an idea of the quantities. I have not yet done any seriously metrical experiments.

Added later.—My assistant, Mr. E. E. Robinson, early noticed that when a telephone was used as receiver, say with a single-point coherer (see illustration on opposite page), which is a very sensitive arrangement, every disturbance of the coherer due to received waves is accompanied by a crackle or tick in the telephone, without any tapping back being necessary. This is, indeed, the easiest mode of receiving signals, and we often practised it. If a suitable, well-damped galvanometer, such as a Thomson marine speaking-galvanometer, is included also in the circuit (a more sensitive one is sometimes necessary—and we frequently used a D’Arsonval—but it must be well damped), the meaning of these ticks is recognised; each represents a minute change in the resistance of the coherer—not at all the full change usually employed, but little subsidiary changes, sometimes up and sometimes down, barely sufficient to affect a galvanometer, but quite adequate (being so sudden) to disturb a telephone. This method of receiving, which at first is very sensitive, after a time becomes less so; the point shows signs of fatigue, probably due to too perfect cohesion having been gradually established, and a mechanical tap back is desirable to restore it to its original condition.

If all the signals received were precisely of the same strength, I doubt if these superposed crimples of resistance would occur; but signals depending on quality of sending spark never are of the same strength, and accordingly the sudden slight variations of resistance do occur. Usually an ordinary high resistance telephone was employed, and it was joined to the coherer circuit through one of the usual small transformers—a plan which has many obvious advantages. [Pg 27]

Simplest Receiving Arrangement: a Telephone in Circuit with Single-point Coherer without Tapper-back. B a needle resting against a watch-spring A adjusted by screw C.

Syntonic Sender and Receiver used in the experiments plotted on page 28. The switch enables the coherer K to be connected either to the tuned resonator M L N or to the detecting circuit E F. Weak impulses are felt when the switch is C E, D F; strong impulses when the switch is C A, D B; provided the coil L is similar to the coil of the radiator above. The impulses are plotted in the diagram Fig. 19A.

[Pg 28]

October 27, 1897.

Fig. 19a.— Current through Coherer after successive Electrical Stimuli, without any mechanical tapping back. The sudden rises are obtained when the circuits are syntonised. Weaker stimuli cause the descents.

The fluctuations of resistance of a coherer dependent on various strengths of stimulus are instructively shown in some metrical experiments made by Mr. Robinson, and a plotting of which I showed to the Physical Society of London in 1897. This plotting is here reproduced, and it shows the singular fact that, whereas a stronger electrical stimulus usually decreases the resistance, as is natural, a weaker subsequent stimulus usually increases it again: so that alternately strong and weak stimuli send the curve zigzagging up and down, until it gets into a condition demanding rejuvenation by a mechanical tap back.

Sometimes a decidedly strong electrical stimulus knocks down the conductivity of the coherer as if it had been tapped back. This is almost certainly due to a burning of the delicate contacts—a blowing of a fuse as it were,—and the effect of this electrical burn back is quite different from the effect of a mechanical tap back, inasmuch as it leaves the coherer insensitive. A shaking up is necessary to restore it. [Pg 29]

I now call your attention to the Table on next page of various kinds of detector for electric radiation distributed in groups.

Selenium is inserted in this table in the microphone column, because it is a substance which in certain states is well known to behave to visible light as these other microphonic detectors behave to Hertz waves. It is inserted with a query, to indicate that its position in the table is not certainly known. It may possibly belong to some other column.

### Electrical Theory of Vision.

And I want to suggest that quite possibly the sensitiveness of the eye is of the coherer kind. As I am not a physiologist, I cannot be seriously blamed for making wild and hazardous speculations in that region. I therefore wish to guess that some part of the retina is an electrical organ, say like that of some fishes, maintaining an electromotive force which is prevented from stimulating the nerves solely by an intervening layer of badly conducting material, or of conducting powder with gaps in it; but that when light falls upon the retina these gaps become more or less conducting, and the nerves are stimulated. I do not feel clear which part is taken by the rods and cones, and which part by the pigment cells; I must not try to make the hypothesis too definite at present, though I hope it is obvious what I intend to suggest.

If I had to make a demonstration model of the eye on these lines, I should arrange a little battery to excite a frog’s nerve-muscle preparation through a circuit completed all except a layer of filings or a single bad contact. Such an arrangement would respond to Hertz waves. Or, if I wanted actual light to act, instead of grosser waves, I would use a layer of selenium.

But the bad contact and the Hertz waves are the most instructive, because we do not at present really know what the selenium is doing, any more than what the retina is doing.

And observe that (to my surprise, I confess) the rough outline of a theory of vision thus suggested is in accordance with some of the principal views of the physiologist Hering. The sensation of light is due to the electrical stimulus; the sensation of black is due to the mechanical or tapping back stimulus. Darkness is physiologically not the mere cessation of light. Both are positive sensations, and both stimuli are necessary; for until the filings are tapped back vision is persistent. In the eye model the period of mechanical tremor should be, say, ⅒th second, so as to give the right amount of persistence of impression. [Pg 30]

DETECTORS OF RADIATION.
Physiological. | Chemical. | Thermal. | Electrical. | Mechanical. | Microphonic.
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|  |  |  |  | Selenium.(?)
Eye. | Photographic Plate. | Thermopile. | Spark. (Hertz.) | Electrometer (Blyth and Bjerknes.) | Impulsion Cell. (Minchin.)
˟Frog’s Leg (Hertz and Ritter.) | Explosive Gases. | Bolometer. (Rubens and Ritter). | Telephone; Air-gap and Arc. (Lodge.) | Suspended Wires. (Hertz and Boys.) | Filings. (Branly.)
| Photoelectric Cell. | Expanding Wire. (Gregory.) Thermal Junction. (Klemencic.) | Vacuum Tube. (Dragoumis.) Galvanometer. (Fitzgerald.) Air-gap and Electroscope. (Boltzmann.) Trigger Tube. (Warburg and Zehnder.) |  | Coherer. Hughes and Lodge.

˟ The cross against the frog’s leg indicates that it does not appear really to respond to radiation, unless stimulated in some secondary manner. The names against the other things are unimportant, but suggest the persons who applied the detector to electric radiation.

The interrogation mark against Selenium indicates that its position in the microphonic column may be doubtful.

[Pg 31] No doubt in the eye the tapping back is done automatically by the tissues, so that it is always ready for a new impression, until fatigued. And by mounting an electric bell or other vibrator on the same board as a tube of filings, it is possible to arrange so that a feeble electric stimulus shall produce a feeble steady effect, a stronger stimulus a stronger effect, and so on; the tremor asserting its predominance, and bringing the spot back, whenever the electric stimulus ceases.

An electric bell thus close to the tube is, indeed, not the best vibrator; clockwork might do better, because the bell contains in itself a jerky current, which produces one effect, and a mechanical vibration, which produces an opposite effect, hence the spot of light can hardly keep still. By lessening the vibration—say, by detaching the bell from actual contact with the board, the electric jerks of the intermittent current drive the spot violently up the scale; mechanical tremor brings it down again. It must be clearly understood that electric jerks, due to the make-and-break of an ordinary current, are quite adequate to electrically stimulate a coherer in their neighbourhood. It is constantly to be noticed that a coherer responds best to excessively short sparks of a certain sharp quality.

You observe that the eye on this hypothesis is, in electrometer language, heterostatic. The energy of vision is supplied by the organism; the light only pulls a trigger. Whereas the organ of hearing is idiostatic. I might draw further analogies between this arrangement and the eye, e.g., about the effect of blows or disorder causing irregular conduction and stimulation, of the galvanometer in the one instrument, of the brain cells in the other.

A handy portable exciter of electric waves is one of the ordinary hand electric gas-lighters, containing a small revolving doubler—i.e., an inductive or replenishing machine. A coherer [Pg 32] can feel a gas-lighter across a lecture theatre. Minchin often used them for stimulating his impulsion cells. I find that when held near they act a little even when no ordinary spark occurs, plainly because of the little incipient sparks at the brushes or tinfoil contacts inside. A Voss machine acts similarly, giving a small deflection while working up before it sparks: indeed, these small sparks are often more effective than bigger ones.

### Demonstration of Ordinary Holtz Machine
Sparks not exciting Tube:
except by help of a polished knob.

And notice here that our model eye has a well-defined range of vision. It cannot see waves too long for it. The powerful disturbance caused by the violent flashes of a Holtz or Wimshurst or Voss machine it is blind to. The loud sparks have no effect on it. They are like infra-red radiation to the eye. If the knobs of the machine are well polished the coherer begins to respond again, evidently by reason of some high harmonics, due to vibrations in the terminal rods; and these are the vibrations to which it responds when excited simply by an induction coil. The coil should have knobs instead of points. Sparks from points or dirty knobs hardly excite the coherer at all. But hold a well-polished sphere or third knob between even the dirty knobs of a Voss machine, and the coherer responds at once to the surgings got up in that clean sphere.

Feeble short sparks again are often more powerful exciters than are strong long ones. I suppose because they are more sudden. This is instructively shown with an electrophorous lid. Spark it to a knuckle, and it does very little. Spark it to a clean knob held in the hand and it works well. But now spark it to an insulated sphere, there is some effect. Discharge the sphere, and take a second spark, without recharging the lid; do this several times; and at last, when the spark is inaudible, invisible, and otherwise imperceptible, the coherer some yards away responds more violently than ever, and the spot of light rushes from the scale.

If a coherer be attached by a side wire to the gas pipes, and an electrophorous spark be given to either the gas pipes or the water pipes or even to the hot-water system in any other room of the [Pg 33] building, the coherer responds. It is surprising how far these impulses can be felt along an ordinary uninsulated wire or other conductor.

In fact, when thus connected to gas pipes one day when I tried it, the spot of light could hardly keep still five seconds. Whether there was a distant thunderstorm, or whether it was only picking up telegraphic jerks, I do not know. The jerk of turning on or off an extra Swan lamp can affect it when sensitive. I hope to try for long-wave radiation from the sun, filtering out the ordinary well-known waves by a blackboard or other sufficiently opaque substance.

[I did not succeed in this, for a sensitive coherer in an outside shed unprotected by the thick walls of a substantial building cannot be kept quiet for long. I found its spot of light liable to frequent weak and occasionally violent excursions, and I could not trace any of these to the influence of the sun. There were evidently too many terrestrial sources of disturbance in a city like Liverpool to make the experiment feasible. I don’t know that it might not possibly be successful in some isolated country place; but clearly the arrangement must be highly sensitive in order to succeed.]

We can easily see the detector respond to a distant source of radiation now, viz., to a 5 in. sphere placed in the library between secondary coil knobs; separated from the receiver, therefore, by several walls and some heavily gilded paper, as well as by 20 or 30 yards of space (Fig. 19.)

Fig. 19b.— A Portable Detector, B the Collecting Wire.

Also I exhibit (Fig. 19b) [Pg 34] a small complete detector made by my assistant, Mr. Davies, which is quite portable and easily set up. The essentials (battery, galvanometer, and coherer) are all in a copper cylinder, A, three inches by two. A bit of wire, B, a few inches long, pegged into it, helps it to collect waves. It is just conceivable that at some distant date, say by dint of inserting gold wires or powder in the retina, we may be enabled to see waves which at present we are blind to.

Observe how simple the production and detection of Hertz waves are now. An electrophorus or a frictional machine serves to excite them; a voltaic cell, a rough galvanometer, and a bad contact serves to detect them. Indeed, they might have been observed at the beginning of the century, before galvanometers were known: a frog’s leg or an iodide of starch paper would do almost as well.

A bad contact was at one time regarded as a simple nuisance, because of the singularly uncertain and capricious character of the current transmitted by it. Hughes observed its sensitiveness to sound waves, and it became the microphone. Now it turns out to be sensitive to electric waves, if it be made of any oxidisable medal (not of carbon),[16] and we have an instrument which might be called a micro-something, but which, as it appears to act by cohesion, I at present call a coherer. Perhaps some of the capriciousness of an anathematised bad contact was sometimes due to the fact that it was responding to stray electric radiation. (See Appendix III., pp. 109 and 111.)

The breaking down of cohesion by mechanical tremor is an ancient process, observed on a large scale by engineers in railway axles and girders; indeed, the cutting of small girders by persistent blows of hammer and chisel reminded me the other day of the tapping back of our cohering surfaces after they have been exposed to the uniting effect of an electric jerk.

### Receiver in Metallic Enclosure.

If a coherer is shut up in a complete metallic enclosure, waves cannot get at it, but if wires are led from it to an outside ordinary [Pg 35] galvanometer, it remains nearly as sensitive as it was before (nearly, not quite), for the circuit picks up the waves and they run along the insulated wires into the closed box. To screen it effectively, it is necessary to enclose battery and galvanometer and every bit of wire connection; the only thing that may be left outside is the needle of the galvanometer. Accordingly, here we have a compact arrangement of battery and galvanometer coil and coherer, all shut up in a copper box (Fig. 19c). The galvanometer coil is fixed against the side of the box at such height that it can act conveniently on an outside suspended compass needle. The slow magnetic action of the current in the coil has no difficulty in getting through copper, as everyone knows: only a perfect conductor could screen off that; but the Hertz waves are effectively kept out by the sheet copper.

Fig. 19c.— Protected Detector. A is an occasional wire passing through shuttered aperture. E is a lead tube enclosing leading wires, as in Fig. 21.

It must be said, however, that the box must be exceedingly well closed for the screening to be perfect. The very narrowest chink permits their entrance, and at one time I thought I should have to solder a lid on before they could be kept entirely out. Clamping a copper lid on to a flange in six places was not enough. But by the use of pads of tinfoil [Pg 36] and tight clamping, chinks can be avoided, and the inside of the box becomes then electrically dark.

If even an inch of the circuit protrudes, it at once becomes slightly sensitive again; and if a mere single wire protrudes through the box, not connected to anything at either end, provided it is insulated where it passes through, the waves will utilise it as a speaking-tube, and run blithely in. And this happens whether the wire be connected to anything inside or not, though it acts more strongly when connected.

In careful experiments, where the galvanometer is protected in one copper box and the coherer in another, the wires connecting the two must be encased in a metal tube (Figs. 19c and 21), and this tube must be well connected with the metal of both enclosures, if nothing is to get in but what is wanted.

Fig. 20.— Spherical Radiator for emitting a Horizontal Beam, arranged inside a Copper Hat, fixed against the outside of a metal-lined Box, which contains induction coil and battery and key. One-eighth natural size. The wires pass into the box through glass tubes not shown.

Similarly when definite radiation is desired, it is well to put the radiator in a copper hat open in only one direction (Fig. 20), and in order to guard against reflected and collateral surgings running along the wires which pass outside to the exciting coil and battery, as they are liable to do, I am accustomed to put all the sending apparatus in a [Pg 37] packing case lined with tinfoil, to the outside of which the sending hat (Fig. 20) is fixed, and to pull the key of the primary exciting circuit by a string from outside, so that not even key connections shall protrude, else exact optical experiments are impossible.

Fig. 21.— General arrangement of experiments with the Copper “Hat,” showing Metal Box on a Stool, standing outside the Theatre. The Box is not exactly represented, but inside it the Radiators were fixed with a graduated series of apertures; the Copper Hat containing the Coherer is seen on the Table with the Metal Box on the left of the Table containing Battery and Galvanometer Coil connected to it by a compo pipe conveying the wires, as in Fig. 19c; the Lamp and Scale barely indicated at one side of the Table; a Paraffin Prism; and a Polarising Grid of copper wires stretched on a frame. (This figure is from a thumbnail sketch by Mr. A. P. Trotter, taken at the Lecture in 1894.)

Even then, with the lid of the hat well clamped on, something gets out, but it is not enough to cause serious disturbance of qualitative results. The sender must evidently be thought of as emitting a momentary blaze of light which escapes through every chink. Or, indeed, since the waves are some inches long, the difficulty of keeping them out of an enclosure may be likened to the difficulty of excluding sound; though the difficulty is not quite so great as that, since a [Pg 38] reasonable thickness of metal is really opaque. I fancied once or twice I detected a trace of transparency in such metal sheets as ordinary tinplate, but unnoticed chinks elsewhere may have deceived me. It is a thing easy to make sure of as soon as I have more time. (Tinplate is quite opaque. Lead paper lets a little through.)

One thing in this connection is noticeable, and that is how little radiation gets either in or out of a small round hole. A narrow long chink in the receiver box lets in a lot; a round hole the size of a shilling lets in hardly any, unless indeed a bit of insulated wire protrudes through it like a collecting ear trumpet, as at A, Fig. 19c.

It may be asked how the waves get out of the metal tube of an electric gas-lighter. But they do not; they get out through the handle, which being of ebonite is transparent. Wrap up the handle in tinfoil, and a gas-lighter is powerless.

### Optical Experiments.

And now, in conclusion, I will show some of the ordinary optical experiments with Hertz waves, using as source either one of two devices: either a 5 in. sphere with sparks to ends of a diameter (Fig. 19), an arrangement which emits 7 in. waves but of so dead-beat a character that it is wise to enclose it in a copper hat to prolong them and send them out in the desired direction, or else a 2 in. hollow cylinder with spark knobs at ends of an internal diameter (Fig. 12). This last emits 3 in. waves of a very fairly persistent character, but with nothing like the intensity of one of the outside radiators.

As receiver there is no need to use anything sensitive, so I employ a glass tube full of coarse iron filings, put at the back of a copper hat with its mouth turned well askew to the source, which is put outside the door at a distance of some yards, so that only a little direct radiation can reach the tube. Sometimes the tube is put lengthways in the hat instead of crossways, which makes it less sensitive, and has also the advantage of doing away with the polarising, or rather analysing, power of a crossway tube.

The radiation from the sphere is still too strong, but it can be stopped down by a diaphragm plate with holes in it of varying size clamped on the sending box (right-hand side of Fig. 21). [Pg 39]

#### Reflection.

Having thus reduced the excursion of the spot of light to a foot or so, a metal plate is held as reflector, and at once the spot travels a couple of yards. A wet cloth reflects something, but a thin glass plate, if dry, reflects next to nothing, being, as is well known, too thin to give anything but “the black spot.” I have fancied that it reflects something of the 3 in. waves.

With reference to the reflecting power of different substances, it may be interesting to give the following numbers showing the motion of the spot of light when 8 in. waves were reflected into the copper hat, the angle of incidence being about 45 deg., by the following mirrors:—

Sheet of window glass | 0 | or at most | 1 division.
Human body | 7 | divisions. |
Drawing board | 12 | ”
Towel soaked with tap-water | 12 | ”
Tea-paper (lead?) | 40 | ”
Dutch metal paper | 70 | ”
Tinfoil | 80 | ”
Sheet copper | 100 | and up against stops.

#### Refracting Prism and Lens.

A block of paraffin about a cubic foot in volume is cast into the shape of a prism with angles 75 deg., 60 deg., and 45 deg. Using the large angle, the rays are refracted into the receiving hat (Fig. 21), and produce an effect much larger than when the prism is removed.

An ordinary 9 in. glass lens is next placed near the source, and by means of the light of a taper it is focussed between source and receiver. The lens is seen to increase the effect by concentrating the electric radiation.

#### Arago Disc; Grating;
and Zone-plate.

The lens helps us to set correctly an 18 in. circular copper disc in position for showing the bright diffraction spot. Removing the disc, the effect is much the same as when it was present, in accordance with the theory of Poisson. Add the lens and the effect is greater. With a diffraction grating of copper strips 2 in. broad and 2 in. apart, I have not yet succeeded in getting good results. It is difficult to get sharp [Pg 40] nodes and interference effects with these sensitive detectors in a room. I expect to do better when I can try out of doors, away from so many reflecting surfaces; indoors it is like trying delicate optical experiments in a small whitewashed chamber well supplied with looking-glasses; nor have I ever succeeded in getting clear concentration with this zone-plate having Newton’s rings fixed to it in tinfoil. The coherer, at any rate in a room, does not seem well adapted to interference experiments; it is probably too sensitive, and responds even at the nodes, unless they are made more perfect than is easily practicable. But really there is nothing of much interest now in diffraction effects, except the demonstration of the waves and the measure of their length. There was immense interest in Hertz’s time, because then the wave character of the radiation had to be proved; but every possible kind of wave must give interference and diffraction effects, and their theory is, so to say, worked out. More interest attaches to polarisation, double refraction, and dispersion experiments.

Fig. 22.— Zone-plate of Tinfoil on Glass.
Every circular strip is of area equal to central space.

#### Polarising and Analysing Grids.

Polarisation experiments are easy enough. Radiation from a sphere, or [Pg 41] cylinder, or dumb-bell is already strongly polarised, and the tube acts as a partial analyser, responding much more vigorously when its length is parallel to the line of sparks than when they are crossed; but a convenient extra polariser is a grid of wires something like what was used by Hertz, only on a much smaller scale; say an 18 in. octagonal frame of copper strip with a harp of parallel copper wires (see Fig. 21, on floor). The spark-line of the radiator (Fig. 20) being set at 45 deg., a vertical grid placed over the receiver reduces the reflection to about one-half, and a crossed grid over the source reduces it to nearly nothing.

Rotating either grid a little rapidly increases the effect, which becomes a maximum when they are parallel. The interposition of a third grid, with its wires at 45 deg., between two crossed grids, restores some of the obliterated effect.

Radiation reflected from a grid is strongly polarised, of course, in a plane normal to that of the radiation which gets through it. They are thus analogous in their effect to Nicols, or to a pile of plates.

The electric vibrations which get through these grids are at right angles to the wires. Vibrations parallel to the wires are reflected or absorbed.

#### Reflecting Paraffin Surface;
Direction of Vibrations in Polarised Light.

To demonstrate that the so-called plane of polarisation of the radiation transmitted by a grid is at right angles to the electric vibration,[17] i.e., that when light is reflected from the boundary of a transparent substance at the polarising angle the electric vibrations of the reflected beam are perpendicular to the plane of reflection, I use the same paraffin prism as before; but this time I use its largest face as a reflector, and set it at something near the polarising angle. When the line of wires of the grid over the mouth of the emitter is parallel [Pg 42] to the plane of incidence, in which case the electric vibrations are perpendicular to the plane of incidence, plenty of radiation is reflected by the paraffin face. Turning the grid so that the electric vibrations are in the plane of incidence, we find that the paraffin surface set at the proper angle is able to reflect hardly anything. In other words, the vibrations contemplated by Fresnel are the electric vibrations; those dealt with by McCullagh are the magnetic ones.

Thus are some of the surmises of genius verified and made obvious to the wayfaring man.

END OF LECTURE.

[Pg 43]

### NOTE WITH REFERENCE TO
ELECTRIC WAVES ON WIRES.

It may be well to explain that in my Royal Institution lecture I made no reference to the transmission of waves along wires. I regard the transmission of waves in free space as the special discovery of Hertz; though undoubtedly he got them on wires too. Their transmission along wires is, however, a much older thing. Von Bezold saw them in 1870, and I myself got quantitative evidence of nodes and loops in wires when working with Mr. Chattock in the session 1887-8 (see, for instance, contemporary reports of the Bath Meeting of the British Association, 1888, in The Electrician), and I exhibited them some time afterwards to the Physical Society, the wires themselves becoming momentarily luminous at every discharge except at the nodes, thus enabling the waves to be actually seen, having been made stationary by reflexion as in the corresponding acoustic experiment of Melde. This experiment does not appear to have been properly known (p. 78).

Fig. 23.

It may be worth mentioning that the arrangement frequently referred to in Germany by the name of Lecher (viz., that shown in Fig. 23), and on which a great number of experiments have been made, is nothing but a pair of Leyden jars with long wires leading from their outer coats, such as I constantly employed in these experiments. The wires from the [Pg 44] outer coat in my experiment were very long, sometimes going five or six times round a large hall, like telegraph wires. And many measurements of wave length were thus made by me at the same period as that in which Hertz was working at Carlsruhe. The use of air dielectric instead of glass permits the capacity to be adjusted, and also readily enables the capacity to be small, and the frequency, therefore, high; but otherwise the arrangement is the same in principle as had frequently been used by myself in the series of experiments called “the recoil kick” (Proc. Roy. Soc., June 1891, Vol. 50, pp. 23-39). For these and other reasons no reference has been made in my lecture to the work done on wires by Sarasin and De la Rive; nor to other excellent work done by Lecher, Rubens, Arons, Paalzow, Ritter, Blondlot, Curie, D. E. Jones, Yule, Barton, and other experimenters.

[Pg 45]

## APPLICATION OF THIS METHOD OF
SIGNALLING AT A DISTANCE
TO ACTUAL TELEGRAPHY.

Although the method of signalling to a moderate distance through walls or other non-conducting obstructions by means of Hertz waves emitted from one station and detected by Branly filing tubes at another station was practised by the author and by several other persons in this country, it was not applied by them to actual telegraphy. The idea of replacing a galvanometer, which was preferably a well-damped or speaking galvanometer, by a relay working an ordinary sounder or Morse was an obvious one, but so far as the present author was concerned he did not realise that there would be any particular practical advantage in thus with difficulty telegraphing across space instead of with ease by the highly developed and simple telegraphic and telephonic methods rendered possible by the use of a connecting wire. In this non-perception of the practical uses of wireless telegraphy he undoubtedly erred. But others were not so blind, though equally busy; and notably Dr. Alexander Muirhead foresaw the telegraphic importance of this method of signalling immediately after hearing the author’s lecture on June 1st, 1894, and arranged a siphon recorder for the purpose. Captain Jackson also, at Devonport, made experiments for the Admiralty, and succeeded in telegraphing between ships in 1895 (or 1896). Prof. Popoff’s telegraphic application in 1895 is mentioned on page 62.

By some chance a knowledge of the coherer method of detecting electric waves did not spread fast in Germany, the many German workers in Hertz waves continuing, for some time after 1894, the older and less efficient, though for metrical purposes often more convenient, mode of detecting them. But, in Italy, the work described in the preceding [Pg 46] lecture became well known, and the subject was developed largely, especially by Prof. Righi, of Bologna, in the optical direction. It was also developed in the same direction with many most interesting results by Prof. Bose, of Calcutta, as mentioned in the text. Prof. Righi made a large number of experiments, which he has since described in an Italian treatise, “Opticé Elettrica,” and it appears that it was from him that Signor Marconi learned about the subject, and immediately conceived the idea of applying it to commercial telegraphy. He appears to have worked at the subject for a short time in Italy, aiming at getting the receiver to be more satisfactory and dependable, and improving the early form of Branly filings tube depicted on page 23 by greatly diminishing its size, bringing the terminals closer together, and replacing the coarse borings by fine filings. He also sealed them up in a vacuum, just as the author did, as related on page 34. The only differences, indeed, between his procedure and the author’s during this time were that Signor Marconi preferred nickel filings with a little mercury and a low vacuum, whereas the author adhered chiefly to iron and brass filings and to high vacua. At last he brought it over to Dublin, where he was advised to take it to the Chief of the Government Telegraphs, Mr. Preece, and accordingly he took his, at that time, crude apparatus to the Post Office in a sealed box. There was no point of novelty in it at this stage.

With the powerful aid of the Post Office Signor Marconi proceeded to develop his system of telegraphy on a large scale; and, sometimes failing, sometimes succeeding, gradually increased the distance over which signalling was possible, and especially began to develop from unpromising beginnings his special method for long-distance, viz., the employment of a sending and receiving conducting plate or other small surface, at the top of a lofty pole, connected through what was at that time supposed apparently to be the real radiator, with the earth. This elevated plate, connected as it now is through a simple spark gap with the earth, is an obvious modification of a Hertz vibrator; for it may be regarded simply as a Hertz vibrator with its axis vertical, as Hertz [Pg 47] often used it, and with its lower plate replaced by the earth, so as to double the available capacity; but the action of a pair of such elevated plates, connected through the earth conductively and through the air inductively, as now used by Marconi for sender and receiver respectively, is not quite like that of a Hertz vibrator and a Hertz receiver acting on one another by emitted radiation in the ordinary way. If it were not the same earth to which the plates were connected, they would have to act ordinarily by radiation, but since it is the same earth, and that earth conducting (possibly, indeed, with a submerged cable sheath connecting favourably-chosen stations), then the two elevated plates are partially like the greatly separated terminals of a single Hertz vibrator.

Only one of the plates is charged during a sending operation, the other is at zero potential, but some trace of the electrostatic lines from one plate may extend in curved lines to the other, just as they extend to every elevated conductor within hail of the sender in any direction.

Then comes the snap of the spark gap and the sudden discharge, equivalent to the rush of an opposite charge of electricity suddenly into the sending plate, disturbing the electric equilibrium at a distance—at any distance to which any trace of electrostatic field had been able to reach—and giving a kind of what is called in lightning a “return stroke.” The effect of this on the distant plate and conductor must be almost infinitesimal; nevertheless, separating it from the earth is the most sensitive detector to a minute sudden rush or jerk of electricity that can be imagined, or that has hitherto been invented,—the coherer. Accordingly, absurdly minute though the disturbance is, the coherer feels it, instantly increases in conductivity, works the relay, and gives the signal. Every spark at the distant spark gap causes a similar rush in or out of the distant elevated plate, and the receiving plate collects such a fraction of this disturbance as to stimulate the coherer and give a signal every time. Not that it is to be supposed never to miss fire. At the present time a coherer is not a rough instrument that can be left free from expert attention with safety for a long time. There are times when it goes on working for days or even weeks, but there are other times when [Pg 48] it gives trouble and needs some form of attention. Let us hope that these latter times will become less frequent, and that the whole thing will become quite dependable before long. The pertinacious way in which Mr. Marconi and his able co-operators have, at great expense, gradually worked the method up from its early difficult and capricious stage to its present great distances and comparative dependableness is worthy of all praise.

Telegraphy by means of Hertz waves, though perhaps chiefly developed in this country, has also been pursued successfully by Prof. Slaby in Germany, who has attained considerable distance over land, with its numerous obstacles, and has published an account of his researches in a book called “Funkentelegraphie”; while like success over land has been attained by M. E. Ducretet, M. Blondel and others in France. M. Ducretet has, indeed, put on the market a compact apparatus whereby beginners can readily try their hands at this mode of signalling; as well as a large-scale apparatus like that employed by Lieutenant Tissot for lighthouse signalling on the coast of Brittany.

The filings tube now chiefly employed by the author is of the following form:—It is a sealed glass tube containing carefully selected iron filings, and exhausted to the highest vacuum. Close together are two little silver globes melted each on its own platinum wire terminal, which are connected with convenient screws on an ebonite stand. The filings are adjusted so as just to cover the two silver globes, and no more; a pocket, or reservoir, however, is sometimes provided whereby more or fewer filings can be easily introduced into the working compartment for experimental purposes. This pocket serves to fix the whole tube to its ebonite body, which is provided with a clamp to attach it to the stiff spring, or movable lever, or other form of support, through which it is to receive the mechanical shocks necessary to restore or decohere it after an electrical stimulus.

The usual plan is to employ an electrical hammer to rap strongly on a stiff brass spring to which the ebonite is clamped, but another plan is to attach the coherer to a lever tilted strongly by an electromagnet after the fashion of a sounder. A rapid succession of gentle taps is often better than one violent one, but experience is the best test of [Pg 49] the kind of restoration wanted, for it depends a good deal on the strength of the electrical stimulus. There are methods of dispensing with this decohering operation altogether.

After a fairly strong electric stimulus all the filings are stuck together into a sort of mat, and nothing but a thorough shaking up will pull them asunder again. A still more violent electric shock may indeed have a decohering effect, but it is not a plan to be recommended, for it seems to be a heat effect, akin to the blowing of a fuse.

For protecting a coherer from undesired stimuli, e.g., from the radiator at its own station, the general method is described on page 35, &c., and the details of it, with the necessary switch for changing over from sending to receiving, are mentioned further on (page 60). But by referring to page 106 it will be seen that M. Branly had already employed such a protecting case, and had worked details out admirably.

Recently Signor Tommasina has shown that, if one end of a short rod or wire be dipped into filings while sparks are occurring in the neighbourhood, the filings adhere to it and to each other, and with care a long string of them can be picked up. The author has examined the behaviour of filings under electrical influence on a glass plate in a microscope, and their movements towards the formation of a complete conducting bridge between the tinfoil terminals together with their disjunctive behaviour when the electrical stimulus is too strong, the thorough cohesion set up by a succession of electrical stimuli, and the partial or complete disruption by an appropriate mechanical stimulus is instructive.

An earlier and most important telegraphic application, based upon information given in the preceding lecture, was made in 1895 by Prof. Popoff, of Russia, and will be mentioned shortly (see page 62). I now proceed to developments of syntonic or attuned telegraphy on the true Hertz-wave principle, the preliminary experiments on which are mentioned above in connection with the figures on page 27. [Pg 50]

## FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS IN THE
TELEGRAPHIC DIRECTION.

### SYNTONIC TELEGRAPHY.

In the present state of the law in this country it appears to be necessary for a scientific man whose investigations may have any practical bearing to refrain from communicating his work to any scientific society, or publishing it in any journal until he has registered it and paid a fee to the Government under the so-called Patent Law. This unfortunate system is well calculated to prevent scientific men in general from giving any attention to practical applications, and to deter them from an attempt to make their researches useful to the community. If a scientific worker publishes in the natural way, no one has any rights in the thing published; it is given away and lies useless, for no one will care to expend capital upon a thing over which he has no effective control. In this case practical developments generally wait until some outsider steps in and either patents some slight addition or modification, or else, as sometimes happens, patents the whole thing, with some slight addition. If a scientific worker refrains from publishing and himself takes out a patent, there are innumerable troubles and possible litigation ahead of him, at least if the thing turns out at all remunerative; but the probability is that, in his otherwise occupied hands, it will not so turn out until the period of his patent right has expired.

Pending a much-to-be-desired emendation of the law, whereby the courts can take cognisance of discoveries or fundamental steps in an invention communicated to and officially dated by a responsible scientific society, and can thereafter award to the discoverer such due and moderate recompense as shall seem appropriate when a great industry has [Pg 51] risen on the basis of that same discovery or fundamental invention—pending this much-to-be-desired modification of the law, it appears to be necessary to go through the inappropriate and repulsive form of registering a claim to an attempt at a monopoly. The instinct of the scientific worker is to publish everything, to hope that any useful aspect of it may be as quickly as possible utilised, and to trust to the instinct for fair play that he shall not be the loser when the thing becomes commercially profitable. To grant him a monopoly is to grant him a more than doubtful boon; to grant him the privilege of fighting for his monopoly is to grant him a pernicious privilege, which will sap his energy, waste his time, and destroy his power of future production.

Fig. 24

(Fig. 5 of Specification 11,575/97).—Syntonic Radiator,
adapted for sending and for receiving.

However, the author, in consultation with friends, decided that registration was, under present conditions, necessary, and, accordingly, for his attempt at syntony and other improvements in the Hertz wave method of signalling, he can refer here to certain patents taken out, in conjunction chiefly with Dr. Alexander Muirhead, his co-worker, which are numbered respectively as follows:— [Pg 52]

Fig. 25

(Fig. 13 of Specification 11,575/97).—Diagram of connections for Syntonic Receiver; e being coherer and w a non-inductive conducting or capacity shunt, to eliminate the self-induction of the receiving instrument.

(1) 11,575 of 1897, wherein is described the general syntonic principle and the mode of prolonging the duration of the vibrations emitted by a radiator or by a receiver. This is done by adding to it electromagnetic inertia (that is, a self-induction coil) in such a way as to lessen its radiating power, converting its type of emission from something like a whip-crack into something more like that of a struck string. (Not pushing it so far as to make it like a fork, though that could be done if desired: see Journal Inst.E.E., December, 1898.) But too prolonged a duration of vibration is not desirable, for it can only be obtained at the expense of radiating power. For the most distant signalling the single pulse or whip-crack is the best, and this is what in practice has hitherto always been employed; but, with it, tuning is of course impossible. A radiator with several swings is less violent at its first impulse than is a momentary emitter; but then the lessened emitting power of a radiator is to be compensated by a correspondingly prolonged duration of vibration on the part of the receiver or absorber, thus rendering the radiator susceptible of tuning to a special similarly-tuned receiver or resonator. The tuned resonator is then to respond, not to the first impulse of the radiator, but to a rapidly worked up succession of properly timed impulses; so that at [Pg 53] length, after an accumulation of two or three, or perhaps four, swings, the electrostatic charges in its terminal plates become sufficient to overflow and spit off into the coherer, thereby effecting its stimulation and giving the signal. A resonator not properly tuned—i.e., one tuned to some different frequency of vibration—would not be able to accumulate impulses, and hence would not respond, unless of course it were so much too near the radiator that the very first swing stimulated it sufficiently to disturb the coherer; in which case, again, there is no room for tuning. The two points to attend to for syntonic discrimination are: (a) that the receiver shall not be so near the emitter as to feel its impulses too easily, i.e., without accumulation; (b) that the properly tuned receiver shall be so arranged that it can work up and accumulate the impulses of the radiator, and before attaining its maximum swing can overflow into the coherer associated with it and thus give the signal.

Fig. 26

(Fig. 10 of Specification 11,575/97).—Interchangeable
Self-Induction Coils for signalling to different stations.

Fig. 27

(Fig. 3 of Specification 11,575/97).—Diagrammatic representation of Syntonic Radiator and Receiver. The middle spark gap h2 h3 is unnecessary, though sometimes helpful. The main charging is done by impulsive rush at the outside knobs.

[Pg 54]

Fig. 28

(Fig. 7 of Specification 11,575/97).—Syntonic
Radiator with earth connection arranged for sending.

The general appearance of a pair of signalling stations on this plan is shown in Fig. 24, where the huts contain the sending and receiving instruments. The self-induction coil joining the two capacity-areas is better depicted in Fig. 25, which also shows one mode of joining up the coherer to a syntonic receiver. (The galvanometer and shunt are, of course, merely typical of any kind of telegraphic instrument whatever.) Fig. 26 indicates one form of sender with three alternative syntonising coils for speaking to three distant attuned stations. Fig. 27 shows a radiator arranged for receiving, but illustrates another method of charging, and one frequently employed by the author, viz., the method by impulsive rush (compare Figs. 11, 12 and 19, on pp. 14 and 25 of this book). The terminals of the Ruhmkorff coil are here connected, not to the capacity-areas direct, but to a pair of knobs near the centre of gravity of each area, so that when the discharge occurs each area is suddenly charged oppositely, and the two opposite charges are left to surge into one [Pg 55] another and set up the oscillations. This impulsive method of charging is essentially that adopted in the spherical whip-crack emitter depicted in Fig. 19 (p. 25, ante), the two poles of the sphere having but small capacity and being joined by as thick a conductor as the equator of the sphere. But for such a radiator as is indicated in Fig. 24 or Fig. 27 the author commonly found that a third short spark gap in the middle was an improvement, and so, as is well known, did Prof. Righi find it, and embodied it in his well-known double-sphere double-knob emitter.

Fig. 29

(Fig. 12 of Specification 11,575/97).—Single-point Coherer, with clockwork Tapper-back operating on the projecting end of the spring clamped at P and lightly touching a needle point n.

The specification also contains figures of earth-connected forms of radiators, with or without self-induction coils, of which Fig. 28 may be here reproduced; and likewise a modification of the point coherer depicted in Fig. 17, on page 22 (see Fig. 29, and also fig. on page 27), where the spiral wire spring is replaced by a piece of straight watch-spring, clamped at one end, adjusted by a screw at the other, and lightly touched by a needle point at its middle; a very gentle tapping back stimulus being provided in the form of a clockwork or other mechanically-driven motor grazing lightly against one end of the spring protruding beyond the clamp for the purpose. [Pg 56]

Fig. 30

(Fig. 14 of Specification 11,575/97).—Another diagram of connections for Syntonic Receiver, with Coherer in a secondary or transformer circuit; a conducting or a capacity shunt for the telegraphic instrument being applicable as before.

Figs. 31 and 32

(Figs. 5 and 6 of Specification 18,644/97).—Modes of connecting a Coherer to one or to a pair of Syntonic Radiators so that it may feel their electrostatic disturbance.

Fig. 33

(Fig. 11 of Specification 18,644/97).—Actual connections for a Sending and Receiving Station on the plan shown in Fig. 37. Left-hand side shows spark sending, right-hand side shows Coherer receiving.

[Pg 57] Fig. 30 shows a coherer inserted in a secondary or transformer circuit, and operated inductively by the oscillations of the receiver, which are thus transformed up and raised in potential.

(2) No. 16,405, 1897, wherein are described chiefly various practical methods of decohering, by means of cams and otherwise, which are appropriate when working rapidly with automatic transmitter and siphon recorder.

(3) No. 18,644, 1897, represents different ways of connecting up a coherer to a syntonic resonator, so as to get the benefit of its overflow without interfering with the working up of the electric oscillations, e.g., Figs. 31, 32 and 33. It also shows a plan for constantly decohering by a rapidly revolving cam a number of coherers in parallel, so that one at least is always ready to receive an impulse (Fig. 34). Further, it arranges to utilise the earth or a cable sheath, or other uninsulated conductor, for the purpose of conveying electric impulses to a distance (Figs. 35, 36, 37 and 38). And next it is arranged to assist the coherer to feel the full effect of any electric jerk by shunting out the battery and galvanometer, which are necessarily in series with it, by means of a condenser of moderate capacity (Fig. 35), which also shows a self-induction mode of sending a stimulus along an uninsulated line. This condenser obstructs all steady currents, such as give the signal, but it transmits freely any momentary electric impulses, such as stimulate a coherer.

Fig. 34

(Fig. 1 of Specification 18,644/97).—Single-point Coherers in parallel, with successive decoherence.

[Pg 58]

Fig. 35

(Fig. 3 of Specification 18,644/97).—A self-induction method of sending jerks into a badly insulated line, and arrangement for detecting such jerks by a single-point Coherer.

Fig. 36

(Fig. 4 of Specification 18,644/97).—Another arrangement for sending jerks into a bare or badly insulated line, and connections for Coherer detection.

Fig. 37

(Fig. 10 of Specification 18,644/97).—Another mode of sending a jerk from a spark gap at j into a badly insulated cable or other conductor, which is connected at the other end to a Coherer, the circuit being completed inductively through the air by means of the areas p, p1. The dotted lines s represent the switch connection of Fig. 33.

[Pg 59]

38

(Fig. 13 of Specification 18,644/97).—Another method of signalling through a pair of imperfect conductors, such as gas and water pipes i, without the above elevated inductive connection.

Fig. 39

(Fig. 3 of Specification 29,069/97).—Diagram of Coherer connection to Syntonic Collector, with capacity shunt for telegraphic instrument.

(4) No. 29,069, 1897. In this patent various methods of connecting up the shunting condenser, whose object it is to transmit all jerks undiluted to the coherer, are shown, all adapted to work with a syntonic resonator (Fig. 39). There is also shown a complete switch (Fig. 40) for effecting the transition from “sending” to “receiving,” exposing the coherer to the full effect of the distant radiator, and completely protecting and isolating it from its home radiator; the switch being so arranged that signalling is impossible unless the home coherer is protected. A rotating commutator is also shown, whose object is to expose the coherer to the full influence of a receiver, especially of a non-syntonic receiver or simple collector, without its being shunted or otherwise interfered with by the telegraphic apparatus; to which, however, immediately afterwards the rotating commutator connects it, and then effects the tapping back. [Pg 60]

Connections are shown (Fig. 41) for a complete sending and receiving station on this plan with a syntonic radiator and resonator indicated (though not to scale). But with syntonic resonators the revolving commutator method is not found to be necessary; the sending and receiving switch, together with the closed box for protecting the coherer in an instantly accessible manner is therefore the chief feature of this diagram.

Fig. 40

(Fig. 6 of Specification 29,069/97).—Switch at a Sending and Receiving Station, to change all the connections with a protected Coherer from receiving to sending by depressing the knob l.

Fig. 41

(Fig. 7 of Specification 29,069/97).—Diagram of connections at a protected Coherer Station with Syntonic Radiator and Collector.

### Earlier Telegraphic Advances.

In April, 1895, a communication was made to the Russian Physical Society by Prof. A. Popoff, of the Torpedo School, Cronstadt, Russia, and appears in the Journal of that Society for January, 1896. In this communication the use of an elevated wire and of a tapper-back worked through a relay by the coherer current are clearly described, and signalling was effected for a distance of 5 kilometres (3½ miles). [Pg 61]

An extract from this communication is given in The Electrician for December, 1897, Vol. XL., page 235, and from it we reproduce Fig. 42, illustrating the tapping back arrangement.

The following extracts from this paper may also be quoted:—

“On using a sensitive relay in the circuit with the coherer tube, and an ordinary electric bell in the other circuit of the relay, for sound signals and as an automatic tapper for the coherer, I obtain an apparatus which exactly answers every electric wave by a short ring, and by rhythmical strokes if electric vibrations be excited continuously.”

“On connecting an electromagnetic recorder in parallel with the bell, tracing a straight line along the paper band which is moved by a 12-hour clockwork cylinder, I obtain an instrument registering by a [Pg 62] cross line on the moving band every electric wave that reaches the coherer from across the atmosphere. Such an apparatus was placed at the Meteorological Observatory at St. Petersburg in July, 1895, one of the electrodes of the coherer being connected by an insulated wire with an ordinary lightning conductor, the other electrode of the tube-coherer being connected with the ground.”

Fig. 42

(Fig. 2 on p. 235 of The Electrician, Vol. XL.).—Method of automatic tapping back by relay current employed for telegraphy by Prof. Popoff in 1895.

Prof. Popoff then goes on to say that his apparatus works well as a lightning recorder, and that he hopes it can be used for signalling to great distances. He says:—

“I can detect waves at the distance of one kilometre if I employ as sender a Hertz vibrator with 30 centimetre spheres, and if I use the ordinary Siemens relay; but with a Bjerknes vibrator 90 centimetres diameter, and a more sensitive relay, I reach five kilometres of good working.”

Thus it is plain that Prof. Popoff employed the elevated wire as receiver in 1895, but did not employ it as sender. [Pg 63]

In 1897 Prof. Slaby, of Berlin, published (in German) a book called “Spark Telegraphy,” in which he described his success in signalling from 3 to 13 miles across land. From this book we take the following illustrations of the coherer and its connections:—

Fig. 43 shows the coherer tied on to a glass tube, by which it is supported.

Fig. 43
(Fig. 7 of Slaby’s book).

Fig. 44 shows the simplest form of its connection to a one-cell battery A and a polarised relay B, which switches on another battery of several cells a operating the Morse instrument or electric bell or sounder b and also the tapper-back c, the hammer of which raps gently on the coherer tube at every signal.

Fig. 44
(Fig. 8 of Slaby’s book).—

Slaby’s arrangement of Coherer and of tapper-back and relay connections.

The actual apparatus is depicted in two views, Figs. 45 and 46, where will be recognised on the left-hand side the coherer and tapper-back; in the middle the batteries, both for relay and for coherer circuits; and on the right-hand side a relay and the signalling or calling instrument, in this case shown as an ordinary electric bell. [Pg 64]

Fig. 45
(Fig. 16 of Slaby’s book).—

View of Slaby’s Receiving Apparatus, with call-bell rung by relay, or with Morse instrument joined on to terminals M, and switch to change from Calling to Signalling. K K are the terminals of elevated wire and earth, and the Coherer and Tapper-back are close to them.

[Pg 65]

Fig. 46
(Fig. 17 of Prof. Slaby’s book).—

An elevation view of Prof. Slaby’s same Apparatus, showing the electromagnet and hammer of the tapper-back worked by relay current from local battery, as in Popoff’s plan of 1895.

[Pg 66] A Morse instrument is to be connected to the terminals M, and either it or the bell can be switched into the circuit at pleasure. The form of relay depicted is special to Slaby, but the rest of the arrangements are practically identical with those shown by Marconi at Dover.

Fig. 47 gives a diagram of the actual connections.

Fig. 48 is a picture of one of Slaby’s signalling stations, showing the way the elevated wire enters the building.

Fig. 47
(Fig. 19 of “Spark Telegraphy”).—

Diagram of Slaby’s connections in the above apparatus. F is the coherer and K the tapper-back.

During September, 1899, the Marconi method of signalling to long distances was demonstrated before the British Association at Dover. The chief feature of the installation was the elevated wire supported by a mast, and terminating at the top in a small conductor, which is usually made of wire netting, and is suspended from an insulating rod. The lower end of this elevated wire passed into the building through an aperture, and was connected to one terminal of the usual Ruhmkorff coil, the other terminal of which was earthed. The signalling key was [Pg 67] of the simplest description, being nothing more than a well-insulated Morse key worked by hand and causing a make-and-break in the primary circuit of the coil. The ordinary trembling break of the induction coil was at work in the usual way, so that while the signalling key was depressed continuously there was a torrent of sparks between the knobs of the secondary. This method of signalling was identical with that employed by everyone since the time of Hertz, except that, instead of connecting the secondary terminals to two insulated plates, one was now connected to earth and the other to a small insulated conductor at considerable elevation.

Fig. 48
(Fig. 11 of Prof. Slaby’s book on “Spark Telegraphy”).

[Pg 68]

Fig. 49
(p. 762, The Electrician, Vol. XLIII.).—

Marconi Signalling Mast at Dover Town Hall.

[Pg 69]

Fig. 50
(Fig. 1, p. 7, The Electrician, Vol. XLIII.).—

Mast at South Foreland; from which Signals went to a similar Mast at Wimereux, near Boulogne.

[Pg 70] From this mast in the town of Dover (Fig. 49) signals could be sent to another loftier mast at the South Foreland (Fig. 50), where it is itself elevated by chalk cliffs far above the sea. From this South Foreland station, which was similar in all essential respects to the Dover station, except that its elevation was greater, messages could be sent and received to and from a station near Boulogne, on the coast of France, and to and from the East Goodwins lightship. The signalling was slow, but appeared dependable, and the simplicity of all the arrangements was remarkable (Fig. 51). Concerning the receiving apparatus there is little to be said, since it is in essence the same as that which has already been described. It consists of a coherer of the plug tube pattern, something like that depicted on page 23, but excessively reduced in size, the glass tube being the size of a quill, the two silver plugs close together separated only by a very few nickel filings. This tube is mounted so that it can be struck after each signal by a light electric hammer worked by a current from a local battery switched on by a Siemens’ polarised relay, which is itself actuated by the coherer current. Whenever the coherer receives a signal the same current that works the tapper works also the Morse instrument standing on the table alongside, and records a short or a long signal on the tape. The coherer with its tapper, the polarised relay, and the battery (a few dry cells) are all enclosed in one oblong iron box, through an aperture in which the lower end of the elevated wire can be inserted and brought into direct connection with the coherer.

To change from transmitting to receiving nothing is needed but the detachment of this wire from the Ruhmkorff coil terminal and its insertion through the aperture of the enclosing box so as to touch the coherer circuit. The object of the box is, of course, the protection of the coherer from undesired disturbances, exactly as described on page 34, and the collecting wire has the function there described likewise.

The electric tapper-back is also mentioned on page 31, but not as being operated through a relay by the coherer circuit’s own current. This last improvement seems to have been devised and employed by Prof. Popoff at Cronstadt in 1895 (see Fig. 42). No doubt it was arrived at independently again by Mr. Marconi and the telegraph officials who assisted him in his early experiments in this country.

The other box shown in Fig. 51 is probably a stand-by in case of accident.

It is difficult to imagine a simpler contrivance, and it appeared to work at Dover dependably, the messages coming out slowly in ordinary dots and dashes, the torrent of sparks being sufficiently rapid not to necessitate the breaking up of the dash into a series of dots. The sluggishness of the Morse instrument or the relay, or the circuit as a whole, enabled this excellent result to be attained with apparent ease. [Pg 71]

Fig. 51
(p. 761, The Electrician, Vol. XLIII.).—

Apparatus for Sending and Receiving, shown by Prof. Fleming to the British Association at Dover.

[Pg 72] A diagram of Marconi’s connection of sensitive tube to the relay and tapper-back and Morse instrument, where W represents the elevated wire, is given in Fig. 52.

Fig. 52
(Fig. 2, of p. 691, The Electrician, Vol. XLII.).—

Diagram of the connection of Relay and Tapper-back and Morse Instrument, as given in Mr. Marconi’s Paper in the Journal of the Inst. Elec. Engineers for April, 1899; the relay being an ordinary Siemens polarised relay.

The mast at the South Foreland was stated to be 150 ft. high, but the cliff on which it stands must be at a still greater elevation above the sea. It was from this station that the real distant signalling was performed, and probably not from the lower mast at Dover.

[Pg 73]

## THE HISTORY OF THE
COHERER PRINCIPLE.

The following, written by Dr. Oliver Lodge, appeared in
“The Electrician” for November 12th, 1897:—

Probably the earliest discovery of cohesion under electric influence was contained in that old, forgotten observation of Guitard in 1850, that when dusty air was electrified from a point the dust particles tended to cohere into strings or flakes. The same thing no doubt occurs in the formation of snowflakes under the influence of atmospheric electrification; and the cohesion of small drops into large ones in the proximity of a charged cloud is exceedingly familiar, since it results in the ordinary thunder-shower. Great light was thrown on these meteorological phenomena by the discovery of Lord Rayleigh in 1879 of the curious behaviour of a small fountain or vertical water-jet when exposed to the neighbourhood of a stick of excited sealing-wax. A smooth orifice being arranged to throw a jet of water about three or four feet nearly vertically, the jet breaks into drops, and the drops scatter in all directions, rebounding from one another and giving a shower of fine spray; but if a stick of sealing-wax be rubbed on the sleeve of a coat and brought within one or two yards of the place where the jet breaks into drops, it will be found that the scattering ceases, the fine spray is no longer formed, and the broken jet rises and descends in great blobs of water. The rain-shower has, in fact, been converted into a thunder-shower. Further experiments, conducted chiefly [Pg 74] with two jets, elucidated the phenomenon.[18] Arranging two nearly parallel jets from neighbouring orifices so as to impinge against each other, they were found ordinarily to rebound after colliding, a sort of film or superficial layer appearing to prevent amalgamation of the jets into one; but if a slight difference of electric potential were maintained between the two jets, say by connecting them to the terminals of a Leclanché cell, then the boundary layer broke down,—the two colliding jets no longer separated with a rebound, but amalgamated and became one.

Lord Rayleigh developed a similar explanation for the single jet. The scattering of the jet in its ordinary state was due to the rebound of colliding drops, as could be seen by examining it with a sufficiently instantaneous or intermittent mode of illumination; but if an electric charge were in the neighbourhood it must be supposed that a trace of potential difference existed between the drops, which caused them to amalgamate into one whenever they collided, and thus speedily to become united into a comparatively few large drops, which then continued on their parabolic way.

At first sight it would seem as if the neighbourhood of a negative charge should charge all the drops positively at the place whence they break off from the earth-connected parent jet, and should thus cause them all to repel each other. And if the electrified sealing-wax is held too close, this is exactly what happens. All the drops are then similarly electrified, and scatter more violently than ever, never in that case coming into any rebounding or other contact with each other. But under a gentler electric influence the similar charging has a less marked result, and a polarisation difference of potential of one or two volts may without difficulty be supposed to exist in the air between drops, partly because they are not all equally charged and partly because each is a conductor acted on inductively by a neighbouring electrified body. In this connection it must be remembered that rubbed sealing wax is at a potential of several thousand volts, and therefore can readily cause a potential gradient of two or three volts per millimetre throughout a yard or two of space. [Pg 75]

The next stage was the re-discovery, in 1883, of Guitard’s old dust phenomenon by the present writer and the late J. W. Clark (Nature, July, 1883; Phil. Mag., March, 1884), when they were working together at the dust-free region seen over hot bodies when strongly illuminated in dusty air. The fact of such dust-free spaces was discovered by Tyndall, and they can readily be seen by placing a lighted spirit lamp or a hot poker in the beam of an electric lamp. Tyndall thought the dust was calcined or burnt up, and that thus the air was freed from it; but this is an utterly erroneous explanation, and the true explanation is of a more recondite character, being connected with the bombarding effect of gas molecules as illustrated in the Crookes radiometer. The dust particles are beaten away from the hot body by a molecular bombardment, which manifests itself even at ordinary pressures on bodies of sufficiently small size, as indeed was also otherwise shown by Tait and Dewar and Osborne Reynolds in the course of remarkable theoretical and practical investigations.[19]

Before arriving at this explanation, however, we experimented to see if the phenomenon was caused by the air having become slightly electrified, perhaps by reason of its having streamed as an upward convection current over the surface of the warm solid, at which we were looking, in a thick smoky atmosphere, in the concentrated light of an electric arc. We therefore purposely electrified the rod, to see what that would do, and we found to our surprise, directly the electric machine was turned, that the smoky atmosphere almost instantaneously disappeared, and the box became quite clear.

This experiment, after development, though described in July, 1883, was shown in public for the first time at the Dublin Royal Society (Nature, April 24, 1884), and subsequently at the British Association meeting in Montreal[20] in 1884, and was applied to the experimental clearing of rooms from dense smoke or fume. It has often been shown since, by Mr. Swan and others, and has become fairly well known.[21]

[Pg 76] The next observation of cohesion under electrical influence was made by the writer in 1889, while working at the protection of telegraphic instruments and cables from lightning,—a research which resulted in the use of choke coils as supplementary to the air gaps of the ordinary lightning guard, and thus to the forms of instrument constructed by Dr. Alex. Muirhead for telegraphic work in this country, and to the supplementary additions adopted by the Westinghouse Company for their non-arcing guards adapted to electric light and power installations in America. The observation of cohesion was a bye-issue, noticed when the knobs of the lightning guard were brought too close together.[22]

When lightning itself strikes a guard, it has indeed often been found that the opposite sides of the protective air gap are fused together. This, no doubt, may be partly due to a straightforward melting or welding by heat, but it is probably not solely that. Molten metals without a flux do not so readily weld. It is almost certainly due to a cohesive action also, the difference of potential between the molten terminals resulting in adhesion and amalgamation, a phenomenon also observed in the frequent locking of an electric arc formed between two metallic electrodes. However this may be, certainly the phenomenon occurs on a small scale, for if the pair of knobs or points placed as a shunt to protect a galvanometer or other telegraphic instrument from lightning (or what is easier experimentally and essentially the same thing, from a Leyden jar discharge) be set too close together, the galvanometer will be found to be short-circuited after a spark, and the knobs will be found, both by mechanical and electrical tests, to be feebly united at a single point.[23] Not only, however, is the galvanometer short-circuited by the metallic junction so formed, but at the instant of the formation of the joint it experiences a very perceptible kick, indicating a momentary current, [Pg 77] coincident no doubt with the electric discharge, but one from which it would have been protected had not the junction occurred. The galvanometer kick is clearly an effect due to the uniting metals, but it has not yet been fully elucidated; it seems to have been first observed by Mr. Stroh in his excellent researches on microphonic action, related in the Journal of the Society of Telegraph Engineers, 1883 and 1887, and it may possibly be thermo-electric, as Prof. Hughes, who also observed it, thinks likely; but it may be electro-chemical, or it may be connected with an effect observed later by FitzGerald in his galvanometer mode of detecting Hertzian waves, which he published at the Royal Institution in 1890. The point of present interest is the cohesion which sets in between the knobs when the spark occurs: an extremely feeble spark was found sufficient to produce the effect, provided the surfaces were already almost infinitely close together, i.e., provided they were already in what would be called contact, with the merest imperceptible film of (probably) oxide separating them, just the kind of film which a chemical flux is useful in removing. The electrical stimulus appears to act as such a flux, and the adhesion of the two surfaces was demonstrated by an electric bell and single cell in circuit. Every time the spark occurred the bell rang, and continued ringing, until the table, or some part of the support of the knobs, was tapped so as to shake or jar them asunder again.[24] The arrangement constitutes a convenient detector in the syntonic Leyden jar experiment, depicted in Fig. 4, p. 6 (see also p. 21).

If the electric bell stands on the same table as the support of the sparking knobs, or, still better, if it be put into mechanical contact with them, its tremor is quite sufficient to break the contact asunder again; unless the spark, and therefore the adhesion, has been too strong. Raising the bell into the air, it ceases to interrupt the spark-induced continuity, and in that case continues to ring; but directly it is replaced so that its vibration can reach the cohered surfaces through their solid supports it usually happens that a few strokes—often, indeed, the first stroke—of the bell, sometimes even the incipient movement of the hammer preparatory to a stroke, is [Pg 78] sufficient to break the circuit and suspend instantly the action, restoring the gap to its original condition and leaving the circuit ready to be completed again by another spark.

The spark in these early experiments was usually supplied from the outer coats of a pair of oppositely-charged small Leyden jars, whose knobs sparked into each other; the idea being to ascertain all the conditions pertaining to the feeble residue of a lighting discharge which is liable to be conducted by telegraph wires to a distance, and there cause some damage to sensitive instruments not suitably protected from sudden electric jerks, whose laws of flow are quite different from those proper to steady currents.

Meanwhile, in 1887 and 1888, had been performed the great experiments of Hertz on electric waves in free space. The writer, assisted by Prof. Chattock, had also made some experiments concerning the production and detection of waves on a system of long parallel wires stretched on insulators across and around a large room, and excited by the discharge of a pair of condensers, an arrangement very similar to that now known under the name of Lecher; and clear experimental evidence of the existence of nodes and loops on such wires, as well as a method of approximately measuring the wave length, was given.[25] The brush luminosity of the wires, afterwards observed more strikingly by Tesla, was also seen and shown to the Physical Society. The interest of these experiments was, however, altogether eclipsed by the brilliant and masterly investigation at Carlsruhe by Hertz, who, as everyone except the British public is aware, put into practice FitzGerald’s 1883 suggestion that Leyden jar discharges should emit Maxwellian radiation, and conclusively demonstrated the existence and some of the properties of such waves by this very means; using, however, Leydens of small capacity, and with the coatings well separated, so that the electrostatic energy of the charge should have an intensity comparable with the magnetic energy of the discharge, even at some distance from the circuit.

The whole subject of electric waves was thus laid open to physicists, [Pg 79] and many have been the workers in the field. Trouton, of Dublin, worked long and successfully at their optical analogies, with the very inadequate means of detection then known;[26] and since better means have been known perhaps the most complete set of experiments published, after Hertz himself, is that contained in the book “Optice Elettrica,” by Prof. Righi, of Bologna; but some account of several previous researches is contained in the second edition of “Modern Views of Electricity,” in the chapter called “Recent Progress,” of date 1892. The means used by Hertz and his immediate followers to detect the waves was simply the little spark which they excited in conductors upon which they fell; electric currents being set up in such conductors by the act of reflection. The effect was often at that time attributed to electric resonance or syntony, but there was very little true resonance in these experiments; the first swing was usually much more powerful than any of the succeeding ones, and was competent to cause the little spark; if it failed the remainder of the swings had but a poor chance of success. Consequently precision of tuning was not really important, though no doubt it would help a little.

It is interesting to note that a magnetic needle detector not unlike Rutherford’s had been used long ago by Joseph Henry at Washington, and that minute induced sparks, identical in all respects with those discovered by Hertz, had been seen in recent times both by Edison and by Silvanus Thompson, being styled “etheric force” by the former; but their theoretic significance had not been perceived, and they were somewhat sceptically regarded. Yet Henry, even in those pre-Maxwellian days, was led to an intuition concerning the spread of electrical disturbance surprisingly near the truth. The truth indeed it was in some sort, but it was not worked out or grasped in detail, and so cannot be considered as more than a brilliant guess; but the fact that an observation of the widespread surgings induced in the neighbourhood of a primary discharge had been made by Henry, and had been seen by others to be capable of giving actual sparks, before the time of Hertz, although it has no real bearing on Hertz’s fresh discovery, and did not lead those who, like the writer, had long been trying to think of a [Pg 80] detector for Maxwellian waves to discover one, nevertheless is instructive as showing how frequently it happens that a fact is lying ready to hand but is not taken up and appreciated until some special or extra stimulus has been supplied.

After Hertz’s results had become well-known, the writer devised a plan whereby real electric resonance could be demonstrated with a pair of actual glass Leyden jars of ordinary pattern, by connecting each to a discharge circuit, the one complete, the other with an air gap, and providing the first or receiving jar with an overflow path or bye-circuit provided with an air gap across which a visible spark could occur whenever the induced oscillations or surgings accumulated in its main circuit were sufficiently intense to make the jar overflow.[27] The air gap was most easily provided by a strip of tinfoil pasted over the lip of the jar, but it served equally well if wires led from the two coatings to a pair of adjustable knobs near together, like a lightning guard, between which the overflow spark could pass. The same knobs indeed were used as had already served for the lightning experiments; and, as in that case, if the knobs are arranged very close together and are put in circuit with a battery and a bell, cohesion sets in and the bell rings whenever the overflow occurs. The bell continues to ring until the stand is tapped, but if the bell itself touches the stand or the table, it rapidly breaks contact by its vibration, exactly as described, p. 77 (see also Fig. 16a, p. 21). Closed Leyden jar circuits are not strong radiators, nor was this resonance then observed excited by true waves. No attempt was at this time made to apply the cohesion principle to the detection of true Hertz waves such as could be felt at a considerable distance from a strongly radiating source.

Before this time, FitzGerald and Trouton had hit upon their galvanometer method of demonstrating to an audience the occurrence of the minute scarcely-visible spark in the gap of a Hertz receiver.[28]

[Pg 81] Prof. Minchin also, working at Cooper’s Hill with his sensitive photo-electric cells, especially with some which he called “impulsion cells,” that behaved abnormally when subjected to taps or other mechanical vibrations, found that when Mr. Gregory was working a Hertz radiator in another part of the same laboratory the electrometer connected to his cells responded.[29] Many other detectors have been devised and used, but this of Minchin’s almost certainly depends on the cohesion principle, though its action seemed paradoxical then. Moreover he was able, by its aid, to signal without wires over a considerable number of yards, at that early date (1890 and 1891).

About the same time, Prof. Boltzmann used a charged gold-leaf electroscope for the same purpose, having it so arranged that the electroscope was on the point of discharging across a minute air gap, so that its leaves were dilated by a definite amount. The slightest excess of charge would make it discharge and the leaves instantly collapse. In this charged condition it was sensitive to very minute electric surgings, and if Hertz waves were excited in another part of the room, the wave disturbances caused the gap to break down and the electroscope leaves to collapse.[30] This method is not a cohesion method, but it led the writer, when subsequently repeating Boltzmann’s results with modifications, to realise that, if the gap were almost closed, cohesion could be made to set in by the surgings induced by regular Hertz waves (Fig. 16, p. 18).

The Boltzmann gap method was accordingly modified in several ways; one way was to make it of carbon and to connect it, with its wave collector, to the terminals of 110-volt electric light leads, so that whenever a Hertz vibrator was discharged and induced a minute spark across the gap, that same spark might close the circuit and establish an arc. This plan forced itself on my attention by the behaviour of sundry Swan lamps suspended with shades so as to illuminate my lecture table, which became short-circuited whenever a large Hertz vibrator was at work; for the lamps were at that time kept from rotation, and thereby from glaring into the eyes of the audience instead of being screened from them, by a couple of copper wires stretched across the theatre. So long as those wires were there, the fuses used to blow whenever a Hertz oscillator was started; an experiment which was [Pg 82] interesting enough, and was shown to several people, including, I think, Prof. FitzGerald, but which was sufficiently a nuisance to necessitate the wires, which were acting as collecting wires, being taken down and replaced by stretched silk threads, which are there to this day. Another modification was to connect the gap to an Abel’s fuse or to a gas leak, which exploded or ignited under the influence of a feeble spark. Yet another was to connect it to a single cell and electric bell or galvanometer, as already explained.

Meanwhile, however, and well before these later experiments on the detection of Hertz waves were in progress, certain discoveries had been made by M. Branly, Professor of Physics in the Catholic Institute of Paris, which were of the greatest interest and importance. Prof. Branly had found that a coat or varnish of fine copper dust, porphyrised copper or other such substance, though it could only conduct a current very feebly, and much as a blacklead pencil trace conducts, under ordinary conditions, yet fell in resistance enormously whenever an electric spark occurred in its neighbourhood; somewhat in the fashion that the resistance of selenium falls on exposure to light. It is not clear that M. Branly recognised that he was dealing with Hertz waves or true electrical radiation, but his observations were most satisfactory and conclusive, and he measured the reduction of resistance caused in a number of different substances, including an assemblage of metallic filings, and conglomerates or paste of filings in various viscous liquids and in dry powders. Moreover, he found that the spark was still operative in reducing resistance even when it was several yards distant.

The account of Prof. Branly’s experiments is to be found in a couple of short communications to the French Academy of Science (Comptes Rendus, Vols. 111 and 112), and the writer had intended to reproduce in abstract the gist of these memoirs; but to readers of The Electrician this is unnecessary, as a descriptive article from La Lumière Electrique has already been translated in full, in July and August, 1891 (see The Electrician, Vol. XXVII., pp. 221 and 448, now reproduced as Appendix). Unfortunately the writer, in common perhaps with others, must confess to having overlooked these articles at the time, probably by reason of their coincidence with the [Pg 83] holiday season. In his second edition of “Modern Views of Electricity,” published in 1892, though he refers on page 359 to the cohesion principle in this connection, the writer is clearly ignorant of Branly’s experiments.

The matter seems to have been ignored in this country till 1892, when Dr. Dawson Turner described the experiments to the British Association in Edinburgh, and even till 1893, when Mr. Croft brought them to the notice of the London Physical Society. Prof. Minchin at once realised that here was a phenomenon analogous to what he had been observing with his impulsion cells, and after a few trials wrote a Paper to the Physical Society recounting his repetitions and modifications of Branly’s experiments.[31] This Paper, before it was read, was circulated by the Society to its country members, and so came to the eye of the writer, who at once wrote a short note summarising some of his work in the same direction, and pointing out that this discovery of Branly’s, thus made known to him, was another case of the electrical cohesion phenomenon already observed by several experimenters. This is published along with Prof. Minchin’s Paper in the Phil. Mag. for January, 1894, and to it the friendly reader is referred. The writer at once proceeded to try the Branly tube of filings, and found it far superior in manageability to either the Boltzmann gap or his own delicately adjusted cohering knobs; though immediately afterwards he and FitzGerald together arranged a single-point coherer, of iron and aluminium (point of sewing needle resting on aluminium foil), of what was at that time extraordinary sensitiveness and of reasonable manageability. A whole series of quasi-optical experiments were then undertaken with the new detector, and were shown to students and to the Liverpool Physical Society; moreover, before long, various improved methods of arranging the filings were gradually adopted, especially by sealing them up in vacuum or in an atmosphere of hydrogen (see page 34) so as to protect them from continued oxidation by the air, and to prevent the film which hypothetically separates the surfaces from growing too thick. Indeed, brass filings in hydrogen speedily got too clean, and became so sensitive that it was almost impossible [Pg 84] to restore the original high resistance by tapping. Consequently, a perfect or Sprengel vacuum was preferred to hydrogen. Almost any filings tube could detect signals from a distance of 60 yards, with a mere six-inch sphere as emitter and without the slightest trouble, but the single-point coherer was usually much more sensitive than any filings tube. Mr. Shelford Bidwell has also worked with varieties of powder.

The tapping back was at first performed by hand, and for optical experiments this is still, perhaps, the most convenient plan; but automatic tappers were very soon arranged, just as with the old knobs; an electric bell mounted on the base of a filings tube (see page 31) was not found very satisfactory, however, because of the disturbances caused by the little sparks at its contact-breaker, to which the previous coarser knob-arrangements had failed to respond; so a clockwork tapper, consisting of a rotating spoke wheel driven by the clockwork of a Morse instrument, and giving to the filings tube or to a coherer a series of jerks occurring at regular intervals, to imitate what the writer supposed must occur in the eye, viz., a restoration to sensitiveness after an interval corresponding to the persistence of impression, was also employed. Many of these things were shown at a Friday evening lecture at the Royal Institution on June 1, 1894, while others were shown the same autumn at the B.A. meeting at Oxford. In both cases signalling was easily carried on from a distance through walls and other obstacles, an emitter being outside and a galvanometer detector inside the room. Distance without obstacle was no difficulty in these experiments, only free distance is not very easy to get in a town, and stupidly enough no attempt was made to apply any but the feeblest power so as to test how far the disturbance could really be detected. Mr. Rutherford, however, with a magnetic detector of his own invention, constructed on a totally different principle, and probably much less sensitive than a coherer, did make the attempt and succeeded in signalling across half-a-mile, full of intervening streets and houses at Cambridge.[32]

Numbers of people have worked at the detection of Hertz waves with filing tube receivers, and every one of them must have known that the [Pg 85] transmission of telegraphic messages in this way over moderate distances was but a matter of demand and supply; Sir W. Crookes, indeed, had already clearly stated this telegraphic application of Hertz waves in the Fortnightly Review for February, 1892, and refers to certain experiments already conducted in that direction,[33] the details of which are unknown to the writer (but see Appendix I.). There remained no doubt a number of points of detail, and considerable improvements in construction, if the method was ever to become practically useful; but these details could safely be left to those who had charge of the Government monopoly of telegraphs, especially as their eminent Head was known to be interested in this kind of subject.

Meanwhile the optical developments of the matter excited most interest among physicists, both here and on the continent; the writer performed some experiments of the kind, Prof. Righi at Bologna performed many more, and Prof. Chunder Bose, of Calcutta, repeated several of them with additions and improvements, using as detector a sort of half-way house between a point coherer and a filings tube by squeezing a few rolls or spirals of wire between a point and a micrometer screw. Restoration to sensitiveness was in this case achieved by relaxing the pressure of the screw, and the writer has not found Bose’s form of coherer specially convenient; but Prof. Bose’s whole apparatus, constructed as it was precisely on lines published by the writer, was well designed in detail and exceedingly compact, being on the scale of an ordinary goniometer; and with it many experiments familiar in ordinary optics could readily be shown with electric radiation.

In all the optical experiments made by any of these observers it was customary to place the axis of the emitter either horizontally, or vertically, or inclined, in other words to emit radiation polarised in any azimuth (or rather altitude), and to arrange the collecting part of the receiver to correspond or otherwise, according as response or no response was desired. In fact, observations on polarisation were the easiest and the most instructive that could be made with the definite [Pg 86] kind of radiation now for the first time at command. The rotation of the plane of polarisation, the conversion of plane into elliptical polarisation, the amount of radiation reflected by substances at different angles and different aspects with regard to the direction of vibration, were readily observed. Furthermore, ever since Hertz’s first discovery, whenever waves had to travel through a metal grid or alongside a plane conductor, it was natural to arrange the electric oscillations so as to be normal to the conducting lines or plane, for if they were tangential they excited electric currents therein, and their energy became wasted in the production of heat. So, in so far as earth and water are conductors, it is desirable to use radiation polarised in a horizontal plane, i.e., with the electric oscillations vertical, if considerable distances are to be traversed by it.

With respect to an explanation why metallic cohesion is caused under electrical influence, the following considerations are offered:—

Mr. Rollo Appleyard made a liquid coherer of two globules or pools of mercury, side by side and touching, but kept apart by a thin film of grease, such as is easily given by a coat of paraffin oil. Connecting up a battery cell to these mercury pools through a key, he found that every time the key is depressed the pools move together and become one; he points out moreover that mercury globules shoot out a tentacle towards the positive terminal (on the principle of the capillary electrometer, of course), and this must be taken into account in any coherer theory.[34] Lord Rayleigh also devised and exhibited a liquid form of coherer. It is interesting to observe, as he points out, that in a mercury form of coherer an appreciable time interval occurs between the depression of the key and the amalgamation of the mercury, the lag looking as if a film had to be mechanically squeezed out between the oppositely-charged mercury surfaces, and as if this took a perceptible fraction of a second to accomplish. This experiment conveys the useful suggestion that cohesion may in all cases be the result of electrostatic attraction, and that the molecular films separating solids in contact [Pg 87] may thus also have to be squeezed out, though as they only touch at single points such extrusion is almost instantaneously achieved. This may very likely be the chief cause, for although a true electro-chemical extension of the range of cohesion between polarised molecules had seemed to the writer to be a possible explanation also, he now perceives that the electrostatic force alone may be sufficient. For it is easy to calculate the force of attraction between two surfaces differing in potential by a volt, and separated from one another by the smallest known thickness of thin film (which is 10⁻⁷ centimetre, or 1 millimicron, called μ μ by microscopists); such force per unit area would be given by the square of the potential gradient divided by 8π, that is, it would amount to

1 |  | 10⁷ |  | 2 | dynes per square centimetre,
25 | 300

which equals 44 atmospheres, and is a very considerable pressure. A hundred times this attractive pressure would exist if the surfaces were within really molecular distance of each other; in addition to the force of true cohesion which would then, still more powerfully, operate; but the film thickness assumed above is such as would just prevent the force of cohesion from effectively acting across the gap, and would leave the electrical attraction due to the one volt alone. Three and a half volts could therefore squeeze metals together with a force equal to a ton load per square inch, and might thus be sufficient to cause them to weld or unite, especially if the electric stimulus simultaneously acted in any way as a flux, by reducing the infinitesimal tarnish of oxide or other compound which must be supposed normally to cover them.

In so far as the approximate contact is not between surfaces, but between points consisting of relatively few molecules, the attractive pressure is greater rather than less. Thus to take an extreme case, the attraction between two oppositely-charged molecules differing only by a volt from each other, and separated by a thin film like the black spot of a soap-film whose thickness was so admirably measured by Profs. Reinold and Rücker, is over 1,000 atmospheres in intensity. These differences of potential across thin films cannot continue for any time, unless a battery is used, for the films do not really insulate; they are able however to act as dielectrics for an instant, and to be burst with what we must be allowed to call a spark, though an infinitesimally small one, if the momentary strain caused by the impulsive rush of electricity is too great.

[Pg 88]

## APPENDIX I.

PROF. HUGHES’S OBSERVATIONS.

An account of the history of the coherer principle would not be complete without a reference to an interesting reminiscence of early observations recently put on record by the discoverer of the microphone. At each stage of his observations of electrical cohesion between metals the author was confronted by a reference to some earlier observations of Prof. Hughes, and he felt sure that during the work on the microphone many or all of the phenomena he was then observing must have been previously encountered by Prof. Hughes. No full account was at that time available, however, but now it is clear that the observations were made (like some of Edison’s on what he called etheric force, and like the very remarkable still earlier ones of Joseph Henry) before the time of Hertz, when the existence of electric waves able to excite sparks or perform other energetic acts was unlooked for and not clearly understood.

Nevertheless, at this early period it is clear that Prof. Hughes observed, though he did not follow up the observation, not only the occurrence of electric waves or impulses in space, but also the coherer method of detecting them; in fact, that he unwittingly made the earliest experiments on wireless telegraphy by this plan.

The simplest way is to quote Prof. Hughes’s letter to Mr. J. J. Fahie from The Electrician, May 5, 1899, p. 40, beginning with Mr. Fahie’s letter as an introduction:— [Pg 89]

Extract from recent letter from Mr. J. J. Fahie to Prof. Hughes.

“Dear Prof. Hughes: I have now in the press a history of Wireless Telegraphy from 1838 to 1899, and in writing to Sir William Crookes for information he tells me that many years ago he saw some experiments of yours with the microphone, in which you signalled from one part of a house to another without connecting wires, and he desires me to refer to you for particulars. I think, with Sir William, that it is a pity you have not hitherto published your results, and I sincerely hope you will now do so. If also you would kindly favour me with a short account, I could find room for it in my book, which is now in the printer’s hands.—Sincerely yours,

J. J. Fahie.

Claremont Hill, St. Helier’s, Jersey,
April 26, 1899.”

Reply from Prof. D. E. Hughes:—

40, Langham-street, W.,
April 29, 1899.

Dear Sir: In reply to yours of the 26th inst., in which you say that Sir William Crookes has told you “that he saw some experiments of mine on aërial telegraphy, in about December, 1879, of which he thinks I ought to have published an account,” and of which you ask for some information, I beg to reply with a few leading experiments that I made on this subject from 1879 up to 1886:—

“In 1879, being engaged upon experiments with my microphone, together with my induction balance, I remarked that at some time I could not get a perfect balance in the induction balance, through apparent want of insulation in the coils, but investigation showed me that the real cause was some loose contact or microphonic joint excited in some portion of the circuit. I then applied the microphone in the circuit, and found that it gave a current or sound in the telephone receiver, no matter if the microphone was placed direct in the circuit, or placed independently at several feet distance from the coils, through which an intermittent current was passing. After numerous experiments, I found that the effect was entirely caused by the extra current produced in the primary coil of the induction balance. [Pg 90]

“Further researches proved that an interrupted current, in any coil, through which an electric current was sent, gave out at each interruption of the primary current, such intense extra currents, that the whole atmosphere in the room (or in several rooms distant) would have a momentary invisible charge, which became evident if a microphonic joint was used as a receiver to a telephone. This led me to experiment upon the best form of a receiver for these invisible electric waves, which evidently permeated great distances, and through all apparent obstacles, such as walls, &c. I found that all microphonic contacts or joints were extremely sensitive. Those formed of a hard carbon such as coke, or a combination of a piece of coke resting upon a bright steel contact, were very sensitive and self-restoring; whilst a loose contact between metals was equally sensitive, but would cohere, or remain in full contact, after the passage of an electric wave.

“The sensitiveness of these microphonic contacts in metals has since been rediscovered by Mons. Ed. Branly, of Paris, and by Prof. Oliver Lodge, in England, by whom the name of ‘coherer’ has been given to this organ of reception; but, as we wish this organ to make a momentary contact and not cohere permanently, the name seems to me ill-suited for the instrument. The most sensitive and perfect receiver that I have yet made does not cohere permanently, but recovers its original state instantly, and, therefore, requires no tapping or mechanical aid to the separation of the contacts after momentarily being brought into close union.

“I soon found that, whilst an invisible spark would produce a thermo-electric current in the microphonic contacts (sufficient to be heard in the telephone in its circuit), it was far better and more powerful to use a feeble voltaic cell in the receiving circuit, the microphonic joint then acting as a relay, by increasing and diminishing the resistance at the contact, by the influence of the electric wave received through the atmosphere.

“I will not describe the numerous forms of the transmitter, and receiver, that I made in 1879, all of which I wrote down in several volumes of manuscripts in 1879 (but these have never been published), most of which can be seen here at my residence at any time; but I will confine myself now to a few salient points. I found that very sudden electric impulses, whether given out to the atmosphere through the extra current from a coil, or from a frictional electric machine, equally affected the microphonic joint, the effect depending more on the sudden high potential effect than any prolonged action. Thus, a spark obtained by rubbing a piece of sealing-wax was equally [Pg 91] as effective as a discharge from a Leyden jar battery of the same potential. The rubbed sealing-wax, or charged Leyden jar, had no effect, until they were discharged by a spark,—and it was evident that this spark, however feeble, acted upon the whole surrounding atmosphere in the form of waves, or invisible rays, of which I could not at the time determine. Hertz, however, by a series of original and masterly experiments, proved in 1887-9, that they were real waves similar to light, but of a lower frequency, though of the same velocity. In 1879, whilst making these experiments on aërial transmission, I had two different problems to solve: 1st, What was the true nature of these electric aërial waves, which seemed, whilst not visible, to spurn all idea of insulation, and to permeate all space to a distance undetermined. 2nd, To discover the best receiver that could act upon a telephone or telegraph instrument, so as to be able to utilise (when required) these waves for the transmission of messages. The second problem came easy to me, when I found that the microphone, which I had previously discovered in 1877-8, had alone the power of rendering these invisible waves evident, either in a telephone or galvanometer, and up to the present time I do not know of anything approaching the sensitiveness of a microphonic joint as a receiver. Branly’s tube, now used by Marconi, was described in my first Paper to the Royal Society (May 8, 1878), as the microphone tube, filled with loose filings of zinc and silver, and Prof. Lodge’s coherer is an ordinary steel microphone, used for a different purpose from that in which I first described it.

“During the long-continued experiments on this subject, between 1879 and 1886, many curious phenomena came out which would be too long to describe. I found that the effect of the extra current in a coil was not increased by having an iron core as an electromagnet—the extra current was less rapid and, therefore, less effective. A similar effect of a delay was produced by Leyden jar discharges. The material of the contact-breaker of the primary current had also a great effect. Thus, if the current was broken between two, or one, piece of carbon, no effect could be perceived of aërial waves, even at short distances of a few feet. The extra current from a small coil, without iron, [Pg 92] was as powerful as an intense spark from a secondary coil, and at that time my experiments seemed to be confined to the use of a single coil of my induction balance, charged by six Daniell cells. With higher battery power, the extra current invariably destroyed the insulation of the coils.

“In December, 1879, I invited several persons to see the results then obtained. Amongst others who called on me and saw my results were:—

“December, 1879.—Mr. W. H. Preece, F.R.S.; Sir William Crookes, F.R.S.; Sir W. Robert Austen, F.R.S.; Prof. W. Gryll Adams, F.R.S.; Mr. W. Groves.

“February 20, 1880.—Mr. Spottiswoode, Pres.R.S.; Prof. Huxley, F.R.S.; Sir George Gabriel Stokes, F.R.S.

“November 7, 1888.—Prof. Dewar, F.R.S.; Mr. Lennox, Royal Institution.

“They all saw experiments upon aërial transmission, as already described, by means of the extra current produced from a small coil and received upon a semi-metallic microphone, the results being heard upon a telephone in connection with the receiving microphone. The transmitter and receiver were in different rooms, about 60 ft. apart. After trying successfully all distances allowed in my residence in Portland-street, my usual method was to put the transmitter in operation and walk up and down Great Portland-street with the receiver in my hand, with the telephone to the ear.

“The sounds seemed to slightly increase for a distance of 60 yards, then gradually diminish, until at 500 yards I could no longer with certainty hear the transmitted signals. What struck me as remarkable was that, opposite certain houses, I could hear better, whilst at others the signals could hardly be perceived. Hertz’s discovery of nodal points in reflected waves (in 1887-9) has explained to me what was then considered a mystery.

“At Mr. A. Stroh’s telegraph instrument manufactory, Mr. Stroh and myself could hear perfectly the currents transmitted from the third story to the basement, but I could not detect clear signals at my residence about a mile distant. The innumerable gas and water pipes intervening seemed to absorb or weaken too much the feeble transmitted extra currents from a small coil. [Pg 93]

“The President of the Royal Society, Mr. Spottiswoode, together with the two hon. secretaries, Prof. Huxley and Prof. G. Stokes, called upon me on February 20, 1880, to see my experiments upon aërial transmission of signals. The experiments shown were most successful, and at first they seemed astonished at the results, but towards the close of three hours’ experiments Prof. Stokes said, ‘that all the results could be explained by known electromagnetic induction effects, and therefore he could not accept my view of actual aërial electric waves unknown up to that time, but thought I had quite enough original matter to form a Paper on the subject to be read at the Royal Society.’

“I was so discouraged at being unable to convince them of the truth of these aërial electric waves, that I actually refused to write a Paper on the subject, until I was better prepared to demonstrate the existence of these waves; and I continued my experiments for some years, in hopes of arriving at a perfect scientific demonstration of the existence of aërial electric waves, produced by a spark from the extra currents in coils, or from frictional electricity or secondary coils. The triumphant demonstration of these waves was reserved to Prof. Hertz, who by his masterly researches upon the subject in 1887-9 completely demonstrating not only their existence but their identity with ordinary light, in having the power of being reflected and refracted, &c., with nodal points, by means of which the length of the waves could be measured, Hertz’s experiments were far more conclusive than mine, although he used a much less effective receiver than the microphone or coherer.

“I then felt it was now too late to bring forward my previous experiments, and through not publishing my results, and means employed, I have been forced to see others remake the discoveries I had previously made as to the sensitiveness of the microphonic contact, and its useful employment as a receiver for electric aërial waves. Amongst the earliest workers in the field of aërial transmission I would draw attention to the experiments of Prof. Henry, who describes in his work, published by the Smithsonian Institute, Washington, D.C., U.S.A., Vol. I., p. 203 (date unknown, probably about 1850), that he magnetised a needle in a coil at 30 ft. distance, and magnetised a needle by a discharge of lightning at eight miles distance. [Pg 94]

“Marconi has lately demonstrated that by the use of the Hertzian waves and Branly’s coherer he has been enabled to transmit and receive aërial electric waves to a greater distance than previously ever dreamed of by the numerous discoverers and inventors who have worked silently in this field. His efforts at demonstration merit the success he has received; and if (as I have lately read) he has discovered the means of concentrating these waves on a single point desired without diminishing its power, then the world will be right in placing his name on the highest pinnacle in relation to aërial electric telegraphy.—Yours, &c.,

D. E. Hughes.”

[Pg 95]

## APPENDIX II.

VARIATIONS OF CONDUCTIVITY
UNDER ELECTRICAL INFLUENCE.

The following is abstracted from an article by M. E. Branly in La Lumière Electrique of May 16, 1891, and is taken from The Electrician of June 26, 1891:—

The object of this article is to describe the first results obtained in an investigation of the variation of resistance of a large number of conductors under various electrical influences. The substances which up to the present have presented the greatest variations in conductivity are the powders or filings of metals. The enormous resistance offered by metal in a state of powder is well known; indeed, if we take a somewhat long column of very fine metallic powder the passage of the current is completely stopped. The increase in the electrical conductivity by pressure of powdered conducting substances is well known, and has had various practical applications. The variations of conductivity, however, which occur on subjecting conducting bodies to various electrical influences have not been previously investigated.

The Effect of Electric Sparks.—Let us take a circuit comprising a single cell, a galvanometer, and some powdered metal enclosed in an ebonite tube of 1 square centimetre cross-section and a few centimetres long. Close the extremities of the tube with two cylindrical copper tubes pressing against the powdered metal and connected to the rest of the circuit. If the powder is sufficiently fine, even a very sensitive galvanometer does not show any evidence of a current passing. The resistance is of the order of millions of ohms, although the same metal melted or under pressure would only offer (the dimensions being the [Pg 96] same) a resistance equal to a fraction of an ohm. There being, therefore, no current in the circuit, a Leyden jar is discharged at some little distance off, and the abrupt and permanent deflection of the galvanometer needle shows that an immediate and a permanent reduction of the resistance has been caused. The resistance of the metal is no longer to be measured in millions of ohms, but in hundreds. Its conductivity increases with the number and intensity of the sparks.

Some 20 or 30 centimetres from a circuit comprising some metallic filings contained in an ebonite cup, let us place a hollow brass sphere, 15 to 20 centimetres in diameter, insulated by a vertical glass support. The filings offer an enormous resistance and the galvanometer needle remains at zero. But if we bring an electrified stick of resin near the sphere, a little spark will pass between the stick and the sphere, and immediately the needle of the galvanometer is violently jerked and then remains permanently deflected. On some fresh filings being placed in the ebonite cup, the resistance of the circuit will again keep the needle at zero. If now the charged brass sphere is touched with the finger, there is a minute discharge and the galvanometer needle is again deflected. With a few accumulators the experiment can easily be made without a galvanometer. The circuit consists of the battery, some metallic powder, a platinum wire, and a mercury cup. The resistance of the powder is so high that the interruption of the circuit takes place without any sparking at the mercury cup. If now a Leyden jar is discharged in the neighbourhood of the circuit the powder is rendered conducting, the platinum wire immediately becomes red hot, and a violent spark occurs on breaking the circuit.

The influence of the spark decreases as the distance increases, but its influence is observable several metres away from the powder, even with a small Wimshurst machine. Repeating the spark increases the conductivity; in fact, with certain substances successive sparks produce successive jerks, and a gradually increasing and persistent deflection of the galvanometer.

Influence of a Conductor traversed by Condenser Discharges.—While using a Wimshurst machine it was noticed that the reduction in the resistance of the filings frequently took place [Pg 97] before discharge. This led me to the following experiment: Take a long brass tube, one end of which is close to the circuit containing the metallic powder; its other end, several metres distant from the circuit, is fairly close to a charged Leyden jar. A spark takes place and the conductor is charged. At the same instant, the conductivity of the metallic powder is greatly increased.

The following arrangement, owing to its efficacy, convenience, and regularity of action was used by me in most of my researches, and I shall briefly call it the A arrangement (see Fig. 53).

Fig. 53.

Fig. 54.

The source of electricity is a two-plate Holtz machine driven at from 100 to 400 revolutions. A sensitive substance is introduced into one of the arms of a Wheatstone bridge, or into the circuit of a single Daniell cell at a distance of some 10 metres (34ft.) from the Holtz machine. Between the discharge knobs of the machine and the Wheatstone bridge, and connected to the former, there are two insulated brass tubes, A A′, running parallel to one another 40 centimetres apart. The Leyden jars usually attached to a Holtz machine may be dispensed with, the capacity of the long brass tubes being in some measure equivalent to them. The knobs S were 1 mm., ·5 mm., or ·1 mm. apart. When the plates were rotated sparks rapidly succeeded each other. Experiments showed that these sparks had no direct effect at a distance of [Pg 98] 10 metres. The two tubes A A′ are not absolutely necessary, the diminution of resistance is easily produced if only one is employed, and in some cases, indeed, a single conductor is more efficacious. An increase in the speed of the machine increases its action to a marked extent. The sparks at S may be suppressed by drawing the knobs apart, but the conductor A will still continue to exert its influence, especially if there is a spark gap anywhere about.

Effects of Induced Currents.—The passage of induced currents through a sensitive substance produces similar effects to those described above. In one instance an induction coil was taken, having two similar wires. The circuit of the secondary wire was closed through a tube containing filings, the galvanometer being also in circuit. Care was taken to ascertain before introducing the filings into the circuit that the currents on make-and-break gave equal and opposite deflections. Filings were then introduced into the circuit, the primary being made and broken at regular intervals. The following table gives the results obtained in the case of zinc filings:—

Zinc Filings.
Galvanometer throws. | Galvanometer throws.
--- | ---
1st | closing | 1° | 1st | opening | 18°
2nd | ” | 64° | 2nd | ” | 100°
3rd | ” | 146° | 3rd | ” | 140°

Effects of Passing Continuous Currents of High E.M.F.—If a continuous current of high E.M.F. is employed, it renders a sensitive substance conducting. The phenomenon may be shown in the following manner. A circuit is made up consisting of a battery, a sensitive substance, and a galvanometer. The E.M.F. of the battery is first one volt, then 100 volts, then one volt. Below I give the galvanometer deflections obtained with an E.M.F. of one volt for three different substances before and after the application of the E.M.F. of 100 volts:—

Before application of current. | After application of current.
--- | ---
16 | 100
0 | 15
1 | 500

In the case of some measurements taken on a Wheatstone bridge a prism of aluminium filings interposed between two copper electrodes offered a [Pg 99] resistance of several million ohms before a high E.M.F. was applied, but only offered a resistance of 350 ohms after the application of this pressure for one minute. The time during which the powder should be interposed in the battery circuit should not be too short. Thus, in one instance, the application for 10 sec. of 75 mercury sulphate cells produced no effect, but their application for 60 sec. resulted in the resistance being reduced from several megohms to 2,500 ohms.

It should be observed that the phenomenon of suddenly increased conductivity occurs, even if the sensitive substance is not in circuit with a battery at the time it is influenced. Thus, the metallic filings, after having been placed in circuit with a Daniell cell, and its high resistance observed, may then be completely insulated and submitted in this condition to the action of a distant spark, or of a charged rod, or of induced currents. If, after this, the filings are replaced in their original circuit, the enormous increase in their conductivity is immediately apparent.

The conductivity produced by these various methods takes place throughout the whole mass of the metallic filings, and in every direction, as the following experiment will show. A vertical ebonite cup containing aluminium powder (see Fig. 54) is placed between two metal plates, A, B; laterally the powder is in contact with two short rods, C, D, which pass through the sides of the ebonite cylinder. A and B can be connected to two terminals of one of the arms of the Wheatstone bridge, C and D being free, and vice versâ. Whatever arrangement is adopted, if a battery of 100 cells is joined up for a few seconds with one or the other of the pairs of terminals, the increase in the conductivity is immediately visible in that direction, and is found to exist also in the direction at right angles.

Substances in which Diminution of Resistance has been Observed.—The substances in which the phenomenon of the sudden increase of conductivity is most easily observed are filings of iron, aluminium, copper, brass, antimony, tellurium, cadmium, zinc, bismuth, &c. The size of the grains and their nature are not the only elements to be considered, for grains of lead of the same size, but coming from different quarters, offer at the same temperature great [Pg 100] differences in resistance (20,000 to 500,000 ohms). Extremely fine metallic powder, as a rule, offers almost perfect resistance to the passage of a current. But if we take a sufficiently short column and exert a sufficiently great pressure a point is soon reached when the electrical influence will effect a sudden increase in the conductivity. Thus, a layer of copper reduced by hydrogen, which does not become conducting under the influence of the electric spark or otherwise, will become so on being submitted to a pressure of 500 grammes to the square centimetre (7 lb. per square inch). Instead of using pressure, I employed as a conductor in some experiments a very fine coating of powdered copper spread on a sheet of unpolished glass or ebonite E (Fig. 55), seven centimetres long and two centimetres broad. A layer of this kind, polished with a burnisher, has a very variable resistance. With a little care one can prepare sheets which are more or less sensitive to electrical action.

Fig. 55.

Metal powder or metal filings are not the only sensitive substances, as powdered galena, which is slightly conducting under pressure, conducts much better after having been submitted to electrical influence. Powdered binoxide of maganese is not very sensitive unless mixed with powdered antimony and compressed.

Making use of the A arrangement, with very short sparks at S (Fig. 35), the phenomenon of increased conductivity can be observed with platinised and silvered glass, also with glass covered with gold, [Pg 101] silver and aluminium foil. Some of the mixtures employed had the consistency of paste. These were mixtures of colza oil and iron, or antimony filings, and of ether or petroleum and aluminium, and plumbago, &c. Other mixtures were solid. If we make a mixture of iron filings and Canada balsam, melted in a water bath, and pour the paste into a little ebonite cup, the ends of which are closed by metallic rods, a substance is obtained which solidifies on cooling. The resistance of such a mixture is lowered from several megohms to a few hundred ohms by an electric spark. Similar results are obtained with a solid rod composed of fused flowers of sulphur and iron or aluminium filings, also by a mixture of melted resin and aluminium filings. In the preparation of these solid sensitive mixtures care must be taken that the insulating substance should only form a small percentage of the whole.

Some interesting results are also obtained with mixtures of sulphur and aluminium, and with resin and aluminium, when in a state of powder. When cold, these mixtures as a rule do not conduct either directly or after they have been exposed to electrical influences, but they become conducting on combining pressure with electrical influences. Thus, a mixture of flowers of sulphur and aluminium filings in equal volumes was placed in a glass tube 24 mm. in diameter. The weight of the mixture was 20 grammes, and the height of the column 22 mm.; with a pressure of 186 grammes per square centimetre (2½ lb. per square inch). The mixture is not conducting, but after exposure to electrical influence, obtained by the A arrangement, the resistance falls to 90 ohms. In a similar manner a mixture of selenium and aluminium, placed in a tube 99 mm. long, was not conducting until after it was exposed to the combined influence of pressure and electricity.

The following is one of the group of numerous experiments of a slightly different character. A mixture of flowers of sulphur and fine aluminium filings, containing two of sulphur to one of aluminium, is placed in a cylindrical glass tube 35 mm. long. By means of a piston, a pressure of 20 kilogrammes per square centimetre (284 lb. per square inch) was applied. It was only necessary to connect the column for 10 sec. to the poles of a 25 cell battery, for the resistance originally infinite to be reduced to 4,000 ohms. [Pg 102]

The arrangement shown in Fig. 56 illustrates another order of experiment. Two rods of copper were oxidised in the flame of a Bunsen burner, and were then arranged to lie across each other, as shown, and were connected to the terminals of the arm of a Wheatstone bridge, the high resistance of the circuit being due to the layers of oxide. Amongst the many measurements made, I found, in one case, a resistance of 80,000 ohms, which, after exposure to the influence of the electric spark, was reduced to 7 ohms. Analogous effects are obtained with oxidised steel rods. Another pretty experiment is to place a cylinder of copper, with an oxidised hemispherical head, on a sheet of oxidised copper. Before exposure to the influence of the electric spark, the oxide offers considerable resistance. The experiment can be repeated several times by merely moving the cylinder from one place to another on the oxidised sheet of copper, thus showing that the phenomenon only takes place at the point of contact of the two layers of oxide.

Fig. 56.

In conclusion, it may be worth noting that, for most of the substances enumerated, an elevation of temperature diminishes the resistance, but the effect of a rise of temperature is transient, and is incomparably less than the effect due to currents of high potential. For a few substances the two effects are opposed.

A second article by Mr. Branly in La Lumière Electrique was abstracted in The Electrician for August 21, 1891, as follows:—

In a preceding article I showed that certain substances undergo an [Pg 103] increase in conductivity under various electrical influences, and that these substances are numerous. The increase in conductivity varies with the energy of the exciting source. If the electric influence is due to the passage of a continuous current, the increase in conductivity is greater the greater the electromotive force of the battery employed. There is, however, no proportionality, the increased conductivity growing more rapidly than the number of cells, and tending quickly to a maximum. If the electric action consists in the passage of discharge currents in metallic rods, as in arrangement A (Fig. 53, p. 97), the conductivity increases with the length of spark at S, and it also increases when the rods are brought nearer the sensitive substance. Successive sparks are additive in their effects, although, if the action of the first one has been very powerful, the resistance is sometimes almost immediately reduced to a minimum.

Restoration of Original Resistance.—The conductivity causes by the various electrical influences lasts sometimes for a long period (24 hours or more), but it is always possible to make it rapidly disappear, particularly by a shock.

The majority of substances tested showed an increase of resistance on being shaken previous to being submitted to any special electrical influence, but after having been influenced the effect of shock is much more marked. The phenomenon is best seen with the metallic filings, but it can also be observed with metalised ebonite sheets with mixtures of liquid insulators and metallic powders, mixtures of metallic filings and insulating substances (compressed or not compressed), and finally with solid bodies.

I observed the return to original resistance in the following manner:—The sensitive substance was placed at K (Fig. 53), and formed part of a circuit which included a Daniell cell and galvanometer. At first no current passes. Sparks are then caused at S, and the needle of the galvanometer is permanently deflected. On smartly tapping the table supporting the ebonite cap in which the sensitive substance is contained, the original condition is completely restored. When the electric action has been of a powerful character, violent blows are necessary. I employed for the purpose of these shocks a hammer fixed on the table, the blows of which could be regulated. [Pg 104]

With some substances, when feebly electrified, the return seemed to be spontaneous, although it was slower than the return of the galvanometer needle to equilibrium. This restoration of the original resistance is attributable to surrounding trepidations, as it was only necessary to walk about the room at a distance of a few metres, or to shake a distant wall. This spontaneous return to original resistance after weak electrical action was visible with a mixture of equal parts of fine selenium and tellurium powders. The restoration of resistance by shock was not observable so long as the electrical influence was at work.

After having been submitted to powerful electric action, shock does not seem to entirely restore substances to their original state, in fact, the substances generally show greater sensitiveness to electric action. Thus, a mixture of colza oil and antimony powder being exposed to the influence of arrangement A, a spark of 5 mm. was at first necessary to break down the resistance, but after the conductivity had been made to disappear by means of blows, a spark of only 1 mm. was sufficient to again render the substance conducting. Finely powdered aluminium has an extremely high resistance. A vertical column of powdered aluminium 5 mm. long of 4 sq. cms. cross-section, submitted to considerable pressure, completely stopped the current from a Daniell cell. The influence of arrangement A produced no effect, but, by direct contact with a Leyden jar, the resistance was reduced to 50 ohms. The effect of shock was then tried, and after this the sparks produced by arrangement A were able to reduce the resistance.

The following experiment is also of the same kind. Aluminium filings placed in a parallelipidic trough completely stopped the current from a Daniell cell, and the resistance offered to a single cell remained infinite after the trough had been placed in the circuit of 25 sulphate of mercury cells for 10sec. The aluminium was next placed in circuit with a battery of 75 cells; a single Daniell cell was then able to send a current through the substance. The original resistance was restored by shock, but not the original condition of things, since a single cell was able to send a current after the aluminium had been circuited for 10 sec. with a battery of only 25 cells. I may add that if the [Pg 105] restoration of resistance was brought about by a violent shock, it was necessary to place the aluminium in circuit with 75 cells for one minute before the resistance was again broken down.

It must be observed that electrical influence is not always necessary to restore conductivity after an apparent return to the original resistance, repeated feeble blows being sometimes successful in bringing this about. Both in the case of slow return by time and sudden return by shock, the original value of the resistance is often increased. Rods of Carré carbon, 1 metre long and 1 mm. in diameter, were particularly noticeable for this phenomenon.

Return to Original Resistance by Temperature Elevation.—A plate of coppered ebonite rendered conducting by electricity, and placed close to a gas jet, quickly regained its original resistance. A solid rod of resin and aluminium, or of sulphur and aluminium, rendered conducting by connection to the poles of a small battery will regain its original resistance by shock; but if the conducting state has been caused by powerful means, such, for instance, as direct contact with a Leyden jar, shock no longer has any effect, at least such a shock as the fragile nature of the material can stand. A slight rise of temperature, however, has the desired result. By suitably regulating the electric action it is possible to get a substance into such a condition that the warmth of the fingers suffices to annul conductivity.

Influence of Surroundings.—Electric action gives rise to no alteration of resistance when the substance is entirely within a closed metal box. The sensitive substance, in circuit with a Daniell cell and a galvanometer, is placed inside a brass box (Fig. 54, p. 97). The absence of current is ascertained, the circuit broken, and the box closed. A Wimshurst machine is then worked a little way off, and will be found to have had no effect. The same result will be obtained if the circuit is kept closed during the time the Wimshurst machine is in operation. If a wire connected at some point to the circuit is passed out through a hole in the box to a distance of 20 cm. to 50 cm., the influence of the Wimshurst machine makes itself felt. On tapping the lid to restore resistance the galvanometer needle remains deflected so long as the sparks continue to pass. If, however, the wires are pushed [Pg 106] in so that they only project a few millimetres, the sparks still passing, a few taps suffice to bring back the needle to zero. On touching the end of the wire with the fingers or a piece of metal conductivity is immediately restored. The movements of the galvanometer needle were rendered visible in these experiments by looking through a piece of wide mesh wire-gauze with a telescope. The respective position of the things was also reversed; that is to say, a Ruhmkorff coil and a periodically discharged Leyden jar were placed inside, and the sensitive substance outside, the box, with the same results.

In some later experiments with a larger metallic case (Fig. 57), and with the Daniel cell, sensitive substance, delicate galvanometer, and Wheatstone Bridge placed inside, I found that a double casing was necessary in order to absolutely suppress all effects. A glass covering afforded no protection.

Fig. 57.

Considerations on the Mechanism of the Effects Produced.—What conclusions are we to draw from the experiments described? The substances employed in these investigations were not conductors, since the metallic particles composing them were separated from each other in the midst of an insulating medium. It was not surprising that currents of high potential, and especially currents induced by discharges, should spark across the insulating intervals. But as the conductivity persisted afterwards, even for the weakest thermo-electric currents, there is some ground for supposing that the insulating medium [Pg 107] is transformed by the passage of the current, and that certain actions, such as shock and rise of temperature, bring about a modification of this new state of the insulating body. Actual movement of the metallic particles cannot be imagined in experiments where the particles, in a layer a few millimetres thick, were fixed in an invariable relative position by extreme pressures, reaching at times to more than 100 kilogrammes per sq. cm. (1,420 lb. to the square inch). Moreover, in the case of solid mixtures, in which the same variations of resistance were produced, displacement seems out of the question. To explain the persistence of the conductivity after the cessation of the electrical influence, are we to suppose in the case of metallic filings a partial volatilisation of the particles creating a conducting medium between the grains of metal? In the case of mixtures of metallic powders, and insulating substances agglomerated by fusion, are we to suppose that the thin insulating layers are pierced by the passage of very small sparks, and that the holes left behind are coated with conducting material? If this explication is admissible for induced currents, it must hold good for continuous currents. If so, we must conclude that these mechanical actions may be produced by batteries of only 10 to 20 volts electromotive force, and which only cause an insignificant current to pass. The following experiment is worth quoting in this connection:—

A circuit was formed by a Daniell cell, a sensitive galvanometer, and some aluminium filings in an ebonite cup. The galvanometer needle remained at zero. The filings were cut out of this circuit, and switched for one minute into circuit with a battery of 43 sulphate of mercury cells. On being replaced in the first circuit, the filings exhibited high conductivity. The result was the same when 10 or 20 cells were employed, or when the current was diminished by interposing in the circuit a column of distilled water, 40 cm. long and 20 mm. in diameter. The cells used (platinum, sulphate of mercury, sulphate of zinc, zinc) had a high internal resistance. Thus, 43 cells (60 volts), when short-circuited, only gave a current of 5 milliamperes. The same battery, with the column of distilled water in circuit only, caused a deflection of 100 mm. on a scale one metre off, with an astatic [Pg 108] galvanometer wound with 50,000 turns. We can, therefore, see how infinitesimally small the initial current must have been when the filings were added to the circuit. The battery acted, therefore, essentially by virtue of its electromotive force.

If mechanical displacement of particles or transportation of conducting bodies seem inadmissible, it is probable that there is a modification of the insulator itself, the modification persisting for some time by virtue of a sort of “coercive force.” An electric current of high potential, which would be completely stopped by a thick insulating sheet, may be supposed to gradually traverse the very thin dielectric layers between the conducting particles, the passage being effected very rapidly if the electric pressure is great, and more slowly if the pressure is less.

Increase of Resistance.—An increase of resistance was observed in these investigations less often than a diminution; nevertheless, a number of frequently repeated experiments enable me to say that increase of resistance is not exceptional, and that the conditions under which it takes place are well defined. Short columns of antimony or aluminium powder when subjected to a pressure of about 1 kilogramme per square centimetre (14·2 lb. per square inch), and offering but a low resistance, exhibited an increase of resistance under the influence of a powerful electrification. Peroxide of lead, a fairly good conductor, always exhibited an increase; so also did some kinds of platinised glass, while others showed alternate effects. For instance, a sheet of platinised glass, which offered a resistance of 700 ohms, became highly conducting after 150 sulphate of mercury cells had been applied to it for 10sec. This condition of conductivity was annulled by contact with a charged Leyden jar, and reappeared after again applying 150 cells for 10sec., and so on. Similar effects were obtained with a thin layer of a mixture of selenium and tellurium poured, when fused, into a groove in a sheet of mica placed between two copper plates. These alternations were always observed several times in succession, and at intervals of several days.

These augmentations and alternations are in no way incompatible with the hypothesis of a physical modification of the insulator by electrical influence.

[Pg 109]

## APPENDIX III.

In connection with the branch of the subject dealt with on page 34, the following communications from Prof. Elihu Thomson and Dr. William J. Morton, M.D., which appeared respectively in the Electrical Engineer, of New York, July 4 and October 24, 1894, will be read with interest. Prof. Thomson writes:—

### CURIOUS EFFECTS OF
HERTZIAN WAVES.

In the issue of the London Electrician of June 8, 1894, under the heading, “Hertzian Waves at the Royal Institution,” the following remark occurs: “It is wholly probable, as Dr. Lodge suggests, that Hertzian waves may often have manifested themselves in physical laboratories to the annoyance of the workers, &c.”

I may mention in this connection that in 1877, if I remember the year correctly, while working a Ruhmkorff induction coil, one terminal of which was grounded and the other terminal of which was attached to an insulated metallic body, Prof. Houston and I noticed that when the sparks were passing between the terminals of the coil, it was possible not only to obtain minute sparks from all metallic bodies in the immediate neighbourhood, that is, in the same room, but that delicate sparks could be taken by holding in the hand a small piece of metal near metallic objects in many other rooms and on different floors in the building, although the pieces were not connected to ground. These could only have been Hertzian effects, but there was no recognition of their true character at the time, though the effects were seen to be connected with the very quick charging and discharging of the insulated body. An account of these experiments was, I think, published in the [Pg 110] Journal of the Franklin Institute at the time. I desire also to mention, as coming under my notice within the past year, a curious and rather amusing illustration of the principle upon which the beautiful instrument for detecting the presence of electric oscillations, devised by Dr. Lodge and called by him the “coherer,” is based.

It was reported to me when in Philadelphia that a certain electro-plater had found that he could not pursue his silver plating operations during thunderstorms, and that if he left his plating over night and a thunderstorm came up the work was invariably ruined. I was disposed to be thoroughly sceptical, and expressed my disbelief in any such effect. Being urged, however, I went to the silver-plater’s shop, which was a small one, and questioned the silver-plater himself concerning the circumstance which had been reported. While it was evident that he was not a man who had informed himself electrically, I could not doubt that, after conversing with him, he had indeed been stating what was perfectly true, namely, that when his operations of plating were going on and a thunderstorm arose, his batteries, which were Smee cells, acted as though they were short-circuited, and the deposit of metal was made at too rapid a rate. The secret came out on an inspection of his connections. The connections of his batteries to his baths were made through a number of bad contacts which could not fail to be of high resistance under ordinary conditions. I could readily see that virtually he was working through a considerable resistance and that he had an excess of battery power for the work. Under these circumstances a flash of lightning would cause coherence of his badly contacting surfaces, and would improve the conductivity so as to cause an excessive flow of current, give a too rapid deposit, and—as he put it—“make the batteries boil.”

The incident suggests the use of Dr. Lodge’s ingenious instrument in the study of the waves which are propagated during thunderstorms, of which waves we have practically little or no information. [Pg 111]

Dr. Morton’s communication is as follows:—

### HERTZIAN WAVES, CARBON MICROPHONES
AND “COHERERS.”

About 18 months ago I put into use in my office the Vetter method of controlling the strength of the current derived from the Edison 110 volt system of electrical distribution. The controlling devices were a 16 c.p. lamp and a pulverised carbon rheostat. By these means a milliampere, or fraction thereof, up to 100 or more, if desirable, can be administered to a patient (see diagram, Fig. 58, on next page).

On several occasions when the electrodes of the system above described were permanently attached to some part of a patient’s person and a spark was being administered to another patient seated upon a platform charged by an influence machine, some 15 ft. distant in the same room, the first patient would exclaim and protest against receiving a considerable shock. On one occasion, when the continuous current electrode was in the neighbourhood of a patient’s temple, the patient experienced the sensation of a flash of light; on other occasions muscular contractions were produced, always simultaneously with the spark. Also upon the occurrence of the spark and shock the needle of the milliamperemeter, a vertical one and calibrated to a wide range of movement over 5 milliamperes, flew across the scale from, for instance, 2 to 5 milliamperes and remained at the higher reading. That a spark occurring 15 ft. away should cause a shock to a person in an independent circuit excited my wonder; it was inexplicable and yet so certain to occur that I was obliged to abandon the use of the two pieces of apparatus at the same time. [Pg 112]

At last, when time permitted, I set out to investigate. I sought for an ordinary induction circuit of parallel wiring and found none. I then suspected the microphonic rheostat of pulverised carbon and having cut it out of circuit I substituted for it a water rheostat. The phenomena now failed to occur. Replacing the carbon rheostat and putting a telephone in circuit I adjusted the milliammeter to read 2 milliamperes, causing an assistant to evoke the distant spark. All was now clear. At each spark the needle jumped forward and a distinct telephone click was heard from the telephone receiver. I observed that the first jump of the needle was the longest as well as the first click in the receiver the loudest, both needle jump and click, dying away gradually at each successive spark until they ceased at from the twentieth to thirtieth. To turn the rheostat off and then on again rendered the experiment repeatable. The reading of the meter, best adapted to success, was about 5 milliamperes though 20 to 50 yielded good results.

Fig. 58.

Unable to furnish any reason why the electric radiation of a distant spark should reduce the resistance of pulverised carbon I refrained from publishing the bare observation in the hopes of finding an explanation by further experimentation, merely noting to friends the delicacy of the pulverised carbon rheostat as a detector of Hertzian [Pg 113] waves and making some further experiments with it and a telephone receiver in circuit in this direction.

The recent publication of the brilliant researches of Dr. Oliver J. Lodge now makes the entire matter clear. Dr. Lodge describes a new form of microphonic detector of Hertzian waves, consisting of two or more pieces of fairly clean metal in light contact and connected to a voltaic cell, a film of oxide of the metal intervening between the surfaces, “so that only an insignificant current is allowed to pass.”

He writes: “Now let the slightest surging occur, say, by reason of a sphere being charged and discharged at a distance of 40 yards; the film at once breaks down—perhaps not completely, that is a question of intensity—but permanently.”

This detector, Dr. Lodge terms a “coherer” because of the partial metallic cohesion above described. Upon this point he says: “A bad contact was at one time regarded as a simple nuisance.” ... “Hughes observed its sensitiveness to sound waves, and it became the microphone. Now it turns out to be sensitive to electric waves, if it be made of any oxidisable metal (not of carbon) and we have an instrument which might be called a micro-something but which, as it appears to act by cohesion, I call at present a coherer.” The cohesive result between the metallic surfaces is also referred to as a “welding effect of an electric jerk.” In the volume just published, entitled “The Work of Hertz and Some of His Successors,” reprinted from The Electrician, London, this foot note is added on p. 30: “FitzGerald tells me that he has succeeded with carbon also.”

My experiments would seem to fully demonstrate that carbon as well as metals may act as coherers. At some recent trials the editors of the Electrical Engineer were present and were fully satisfied as to the swinging up of the needle of the milliamperemeter and the click in the telephone receiver, by repeated tests.

The experimental side of the subject has been so exhaustively and admirably presented by Dr. Lodge (detailed in the publications referred to) that what is here said has no more than a secondary interest. But it may not prove amiss to gather together all the evidence which tends to demonstrate the influence of disruptive discharges upon neighbouring [Pg 114] bad contacts conveying currents. As Lodge points out, fuses may easily be “blown out” in this manner. This has occurred to me on a number of occasions with 10 ampere fuses. Under proper conditions of sparking surfaces and circuit a short spark might suffice.

May it not also be the fact that the fuses melted during thunderstorms in their neighbourhood are melted by reason of the effect of the electric radiations or surgings of the lightning stroke throwing a rush of the current already in the circuit through the fuse rather than by the addition of any new current to the circuit by the atmospheric electricity itself. In this connection Lodge writes: “There are some who think that lightning flashes can do none of these secondary things. They are mistaken.” In this as in other directions the new facts have a practical bearing and a pursuit of further experiments may lead, as often happens, to unexpected developments.

So far as carbon contacts are concerned and the fact that Hertzian waves, like mechanical motion, reduce their resistance, a curious problem is suggested as concerns the principle upon which some carbon transmitters act. An exclusive monopoly of all carbon transmitters is based upon the claim that the variations in resistance are produced by variations in pressure due to a mechanical force, viz., sound waves. If my experiments, above detailed, are exact, two facts appear:

1. That another form of motion, ether vibration, causes a variation of resistance of carbon contacts.

2. That it remains to be proved that variation of pressure is the only means of varying the current strength, for variation of molecular contact occurs in the present instance without any evidence that it is due to variation of pressure.

[Pg 115]

## APPENDIX IV.

ON THE DISELECTRIFICATION OF METALS
AND OTHER BODIES BY LIGHT.

Referring to a footnote to my Royal Institution lecture, on page 11, Messrs. Elster and Geitel have been good enough to call my attention to a great deal of work done by them in the same direction. To make amends for my ignorance of this work at the time of my Royal Institution lecture, and to make it better known in this country, I make abstract of their Papers as follows:—

### Wiedemann’s Annalen, 38, p. 40.—
“On the Dissipation of Negative Electricity by Sun- and Daylight.”

With a view to Arrhenius’ theory concerning atmospheric electricity, we arranged experiments on the photo-electric power of sunlight and diffuse daylight at Wolfenbüttel from the middle of May to the middle of June, 1889. Hoor alone had observed the effect of sunlight; other experimenters had failed to find it, but we find a discharging effect even in diffuse daylight.

We take an insulated zinc dish, 20 cm. diameter, connect it to a quadrant electrometer or an Exner’s electroscope, and expose it in the open so that it can be darkened or illuminated at pleasure. Sunlight makes it lose a negative charge of 300 volts in about 60 seconds. A positive charge of 300 volts is retained. The dissipation of negative electricity ceases in the dark, and is much weakened by the interposition of glass. But light from the blue sky has a distinct effect. Fill the dish with water, or stretch a damp cloth over it, and the action stops. A freshly-scrubbed plate acquires a positive charge of 2½ volts, which can be increased by blowing. [Pg 116]

With freshly-cleansed wires of zinc, aluminium, or magnesium attached to the knob of the electroscope, a permanent negative charge is impossible in open sunlight. Indeed, magnesium shows a dissipating action in diffuse evening light. Such wires act like glowing bodies. Exposing an electroscope so provided in an open space it acquires a positive charge from the atmosphere. No abnormal dissipation of positive electricity has been observed.

### Wied. Ann., 38, p. 497.—
Continuation of Same Subject.

Our success last time was largely due to the great clearness of the sky in June, and we wished to see if we could get the same effect at the beginning of the winter.

The following is our summary of results:

Bright fresh surfaces of the metals zinc, aluminium, magnesium were discharged by both sun- and daylight when they were negatively charged; and they spontaneously acquired a positive charge, whose amount could be increased by blowing.[35] A still more notable sensitiveness to light is shown by the amalgams of certain metals, viz., in the order of their sensitiveness, K, Na, Zn, Sn. Since pure mercury shows no effect, the hypothesis is permissible that the active agent is the metal dissolved in the mercury. If so, the following are the most active metals:—

K, Na (Mg, Al), Zn, Sn.

All other metals tried, such as Sn, Cd, Pb, Cu, Fe, Hg, Pt, and gas carbon, show no action. The same is true of nearly all non-metallic bodies; but one of them—namely, the powder of Balmain’s luminous paint—acted remarkably well in sunlight. Of liquids, hot and cold water, and hot and cold salt solution were completely inactive; consequently wetting the surface of metals destroys their sensibility to light.

The illumination experiments can be arranged in either of two ways. For experiments in free space we use zinc, aluminium, or magnesium wires, or small amalgamated spheres of zinc provided with an iron rod. With these it can be easily shown that the illuminated surface of certain metals act in the same way as a flame collector. [Pg 117]

For demonstration experiments the apparatus described[36] is better, and with this we show the following:—

Amalgamated zinc, negatively charged, discharges almost instantly in sunlight; and if near a positively-electrified body charges itself positively.

The same thing happens, though more slowly, in diffuse daylight. Red glass stops the action, but the following let some through:—Selenite, mica, window glass, blue (cobalt) glass.

Fig. 59.

Explanation of Fig. 59.—B′ is a brightly polished amalgamated zinc plate attached to the negative pole of a Holtz machine, with the positive knob from 6 to 10 centimetres distant. The source of a light is a strip of burning magnesium ribbon 30 to 50 centimetres away. Whenever the spark is able just to choose the path B B′, light shining on the zinc plate checks it and transfers the spark to A A′.

### Wied. Ann., 39, p. 332.—On a Checking Action
of Illumination on Electric Spark and Brush Discharge.

If sparks are just able to occur between a brass knob and a clean [Pg 118] amalgamated zinc cathode, illumination of the latter by ultra-violet light tends to check them. (This is a curious inversion of Hertz’s fundamental experiment on the subject. It is an effect I have not yet observed; but Elster and Geitel’s arrangement differs from mine[37] in that the surfaces are at a steady high potential before the spark, so that light can exert its discharging influence, whereas in mine the surfaces were at zero potential until the spark-rush occurred. Hertz’s arrangement was more like mine, inasmuch as he illuminated the knobs of an induction coil on the verge of sparking. It appears, then, that whereas the action of light in discharging negative electricity from clean oxidisable metallic surfaces is definite enough, its influence on a spark discharge differs according to the conditions of that discharge—in cases of “steady strain” it tends to hinder the spark; in cases of “sudden rush” it tends to assist it.—O. J. L.)

### Wied. Ann., 41, p. 161.—On the use of
Sodium-Amalgam in Photo-electric Experiments.

Elster and Geitel have repeated some of Righi’s experiments on the discharge of negative electricity from metals in rarefied air, and find, in agreement with him, that a reduction of pressure to about one millimetre increases the discharge velocity about six or seven times. They proceed to try sodium-amalgam exposed to daylight in exhausted tubes, and describe apparatus for the purpose. Such an arrangement simply cannot hold a negative charge in bright daylight, even although it be unprovided with quartz windows. Even paraffin lamps and sodium flames exert some action.

They observe that under the action of light the boundary surface of the metal and glass changes, and the metal begins to cling to the glass. They suppose that Warburg’s vacuum tubes of pure sodium may behave similarly, and show photo-electric sensibility.

### The Same, p. 166.—On a Checking Action of Magnetism
on Photo-Electric Discharge in Rarefied Gases.

The authors point out analogies between the above effects and those they had observed in the action of glowing bodies in air, and they [Pg 119] mention Lenard and Wolf’s experiments (Wied. Ann. XXXVII., p. 443), tending to show that the effect is due to a disintegrating or evaporative effect of light on surfaces. Elster and Geitel had observed that the discharging power of glowing bodies was diminished by application of a magnetic field, the effect being the same as if the temperature was lowered; and they proceed to try if the discharge of negative electricity from illuminated surfaces in highly-rarefied gas could also be checked or hindered by a magnetic field. They find that it can.

Fig. 60.

Explanation of Fig. 60.—The sodium and mercury are introduced through the tube S into the globe K. The tube S is then closed, a pump applied to X, and exhaustion carried on for some days. T is an open funnel sealed into the tube (as is done in some vacuum tubes made by Holtz) to show a curious unilateral conductivity of rarefied gas. The object of this funnel is to permit metal from the interior, free from scum, to be introduced from K to D when the whole is tilted. Thus a bright surface is exposed to the earth ring R. It can be charged negatively, and its leak under illumination be measured, through the terminal D. Sometimes the tube is inverted, so that the active surface may be at D′, further from the earth wire.

Using the light from sparks admitted through a quartz window into the vacuum tube when a negatively charged amalgamated zinc surface was exposed near an earth-connected platinum ring, and between the poles of a small electromagnet, they found that when the tube was full of air at [Pg 120] 10 mm. pressure the magnet had but little effect, but that at 0·15 mm., whereas without the magnet the charge of -270 volts disappeared completely in five seconds, when the magnet was excited it only fell about half that amount in the same time. With hydrogen at 0·24 mm. the result was much the same, and at either greater or less pressure in both cases the magnet had less effect. In oxygen the loss of charge was not quite so rapid; and, again, at a pressure of O·1mm., the magnet more than halved the rate. But in CO₂ the rapidity of loss was extreme.[38] Either at 1·1 mm. or at 0·005 mm. the charge of 270 volts leaked away completely in two seconds when the magnet was not excited; but in the latter case (low pressure) exciting the magnet reduced the speed by about one-half. At the pressure of 1·1 mm. the magnet did not seem to produce an effect. With daylight the results are similar.

Fig. 61.

Explanation of Fig. 61.—P is the plate of amalgamated zinc, and R is the earth ring, as before. Ultra-violet light is introduced through a quartz window Q from a spark gap r. The vessel has a joint at the middle, so that the sensitive plate can be got at and changed. Magnet poles are applied outside this vessel in various positions.

[Pg 121] The authors then discuss the meaning of the result, and its bearing on the opposition hypotheses of Lenard and Wolf and of Righi. Lenard and Wolf’s view is that the loss of negative electricity is due to dust disintegrated from the surface by the action of light, but whose existence they consider is established by an observed effect on steam jets. Righi, on the other hand, believes that gas molecules themselves act the part of electric carriers. Elster and Geitel consider that the magnetic effect observed by them supports this latter view, it being known that a magnet acts on currents through gases; and they surmise that the impact of light vibrations may directly assist electric interchange between a gas molecule and the surface, by setting up in them syntonic stationary vibrations, something like resonant Leyden jars. It is to be remembered that phosphorescent substances, such as Balmain’s paint powder, exhibit marked photo-electric effect in daylight.

Fig. 62.

Explanation of Fig. 62.—A simpler arrangement, like the one above (Fig. 61), whereby clean liquid alkali metals can be introduced into the experimental chamber B, from the preliminary chamber A, through a cleansing funnel, F, which dips its beak into the interior.

The unilateral character of the electric motion, and the charging of neutral surfaces by light, require special hypotheses, concerning an E.M.F. at the boundary of gases and conductors, such as Schuster and Lehmann have made.

### Weid. Ann. 42, p. 564.—Note on a New Form of Apparatus for
Demonstrating the Photo-electric Discharging Action of Daylight.

A vacuum tube suitable for experiments with sodium-amalgam or pure sodium, or the liquid sodium-potassium alloy, is described, with the aid of which a current (shown by the charge of an electroscope) can be maintained by a dry pile through the rarefied gas above the metal when it is illuminated from ordinary windows. [Pg 122]

### Wied. Ann. 43, p. 225.—On the Dependence of the Discharging Action
of Light on the Nature of the Illuminated Surface.

Experiments also on differently-coloured lights. Summary of results. The photo-electrically active metals arrange themselves in the following order—Pure K, alloys of K and Na, pure Na. Amalgams of Rb, K, Na, Li, Mg (Tl, Zn); the same as their voltaic order. With the most sensitive term of the series a candle six metres off can be detected, and the region of spectral red is not inactive. The later terms of the series demand smaller waves, and even for potassium blue light gives a much greater effect than red. No discharge of positive electricity is observable with these substances.

### Wied. Ann. 44, p. 722.—On the Dissipation of Electric Charge
from Mineral Surfaces by Sunlight.

Hitherto only Balmain’s paint powder has been observed to be active among non-metallic substances. Now they try other phosphorescent bodies, and arrive at the following results:—

Fluorspar is conspicuously photo-electric, both in sunlight and daylight, especially the variety of fluorite called stinkfluss.

Freshly-broken surfaces discharge much more rapidly than old surfaces.

Blue waves, and not alone the ultra-violet, have a perceptible effect on fluorspar.

In a vacuum the mineral loses its photo-electric sensibility and its conductivity too. Contact with damp air restores its sensibility. Moistening with water weakens but does not destroy the sensitiveness. On the other hand, igniting the mineral destroys both its photo-electric power and its exceptional phosphorescent property.

Distinct traces of photo-electric power are shown by the following minerals also: Cryolite, heavy spar, celestine, arragonite, strontianite, calcspar, felspar and granite.

The hypothesis that the power of phosphorescing when illuminated is approximately a measure of the discharging power of light has been verified in many cases; the exceptions can probably be explained by the influence which the electrical conductivity of the illuminated substance exerts on the rate of discharge of electricity from its surface. This agreement confirms the view expressed by us on the occasion of experiments with Balmain’s paint, that, during electrical [Pg 123] discharge by light, actions take place which are analogous to those of resonance. Messrs. Wiedemann and Ebert had previously been led by other considerations to the same conclusion.

We are compelled by the results of the present experiments to conclude that a more rapid discharge of electricity into the atmosphere takes place in sunlight than in darkness from the surfaces of the earth, which is composed of mineral particles charged, as the positive sign of the slope of atmospheric potential indicates, with negative electricity.

Fig. 63.

Explanation of Fig. 63.—Arrangement used by Elster and Geitel for exposing various phosphorescent minerals to daylight, while under inductive charge. They were put in powder in the tray P, and the transparent wire-gauze N above them was charged positively from a battery. The metal cover M M′ could be removed and replaced at pleasure, and the effect on a delicate quadrant electrometer connected to P observed. By this method considerable tension can be got up on the mineral surface, notwithstanding that it is close upon zero potential. The light effect depends on tension, not potential.

It seems to us evident that there exists a direct electric action of sunlight upon the earth, and that we have given experimental evidence in favour of the theory put forward by von Bezold and Arrhenius, according to which the sun acts on the earth, not by electrostatic or electro-dynamic action-at-a-distance, which would involve difficulties of a theoretical character, but through the medium of the electrical forces of light waves. We hope soon to establish the consequences of this theory in meteorology in another Paper, giving the results of two years’ observations on the intensity of the most refrangible rays of sunlight and of the slope of atmospheric potential. [Pg 124]

### Wied. Ann., 48, p. 338.—Experiments on the Gradient of
Atmospheric Potential and on Ultra-Violet Solar Radiation.

Elster and Geitel describe the observations they have made for two years on solar radiation, at observing stations of low and high altitude, as tested by its electrical discharging power; and they plot curves of such effective radiation for days and months along with the curves of atmospheric potential observed at the same places. These curves are of much interest, and need study. Incidentally they find that, of the whole effective solar radiation, 60 per cent. was absorbed at altitudes above 3,100 metres; 23 per cent. of the remainder was absorbed in the layer between this and a station at 1,600 metres; and 47 per cent. was absorbed between this and 80 metres above sea level. Or, in other words, of 236 parts which enter the atmosphere 94 reach the highest observing station (Sonnblickgipfel), 72 the middle one (Kolm-Saigurn), and 38 the lowest (Wolfenbüttel). They discuss the question as to how far the daily variation of terrestrial magnetism is due to electrical currents in the atmosphere excited by sunshine and other meteorological matters.

(The Paper and plates are worthy of reproduction in full in the Philosophical Magazine.)

### Weid. Ann., 46, p. 281.—On the Behaviour of Alkali Metal Cathodes in Geissler Tubes; On Photo-Electric Discharge in a Magnetic Field; and On the Measure of Photo-Electric Currents in Potassium Cells by means of a Galvanometer.

Results:—The resistance of a Geissler tube provided with a cathode surface of pure alkali metal is diminished by the light from the sparks of an induction coil; especially when the pressure is ·1 to ·01 mm. of mercury. The resistance which rarefied gas opposes to an electric current in a magnetic field is greatest in the direction normal to the magnetic lines. The changes of resistance effected by any kind of light in a vacuum tube with alkali metal cathode can be measured galvanometrically. (A Daniell cell gives 100 divisions on a Rosenthal galvanometer when coupled up through such an illuminated tube, each division meaning about 10⁻¹⁰· ampere.) [Pg 125]

Fig. 64.

Explanation of Fig. 64.—A vacuum tube of rarefied hydrogen containing alkali metal as cathode, say the liquid K-Na alloy, or solid K or Na. A spark gap at S serves as alternative path, and a stream of sparks can occur to the plate P in the dark. But when light falls on the surface A this stream of sparks can cease, showing that the resistance of the vacuum tube is diminished.

Fig. 65.

Explanation of Fig. 65.—Showing position of magnetic poles with respect to the vacuum tube discharge. With the poles across the line of discharge, as in Fig. on left, excitation of the magnet opposes the leak from the surface. With the poles as in Fig. on right, the discharge is not much affected, it is even sometimes slightly increased.

Fig. 66.

Explanation of Fig. 66.—Potassium vacuum bulbs containing ⅓ millimetre of hydrogen mounted and connected to battery and galvanometer, and arranged as a photo-electric photometer.

[Pg 126]

### Wied. Ann., 48, p. 625. On the Photo-Electric
Comparison of Sources of Light.

Attempts to make such a potassium cell into a photometer.

### Wied. Ann. 52, p. 433. Further Photo-Electric Experiments.

Plates of platinum, silver, copper need exceedingly ultra-violet light before they show any photo-electric power; zinc, aluminium, magnesium show it for visible violet and blue light; the alkali metals, in an atmosphere of rarefied hydrogen, advance their range of sensibility into the spectral red; while under the most favourable conditions they show a sensibility only inferior to that of the eye itself. The authors now use galvanometric methods of measuring the effect, instead of only electrometers, and they arrive at the following results:—

(1) The three alkali metals Na, K, Rb, have different sensibility for differently-coloured lights. For long waves their order of sensibility is Rb, Na, K; though rhubidium is far exceeded by the other two metals in white light.

(2) Illumination of a plane alkali metal cathode surface with polarised light causes greatest discharge if the plane of polarisation is normal to plane of incidence; and least, if the two coincide.

(This is a most remarkable observation. Its probable meaning is that the electric oscillations of light are photo-electrically effective in so far as they are normal to the surface on which they act; while electric oscillations tangential to the surface are scarcely operative. Different angles of incidence must be tried before the proof is complete.—O. J. L.)

(3) Electric oscillations of very short period, such as are given by a Hertz oscillator, are commutated by illumination in the presence of alkali metals in rarefied gas, so as to be able to set up a constant electric tension in the gas.

(A Zehnder tube[39] was used, and the momentary phases of the oscillation during which the metal is negatively charged are apparently taken advantage of by the illumination.)

(4) The photo-electric dissipation showed by powdered fluorspar is dependent on the colour of the mineral, in such a way that the deepest blue, violet or green specimens are the most sensitive.

[Pg 127]

## APPENDIX V.

PHOTO-ELECTRIC RESEARCHES OF
M. AUGUSTE RIGHI.[40]

M. Righi has observed the following facts: (1) That ultra-violet rays reduce to sensibly the same potential two metals placed near each other (plate and gauze parallel and close); (2) That several photo-electric couples of this kind can form a battery; (3) That a simple metallic plate charges itself positively under the influence of radiation; (4) That a voltaic arc formed with a zinc rod gives the strongest effect, while the sun gives none.

Besides these facts he finds:—

(a) That certain gases and vapours, such as coal-gas and CS₂, absorb the active rays strongly.

(b) That if the discharging body is easily movable it recedes like an electric windmill.

(c) A film of gypsum interposed between gauze and plate charges itself negatively on the side facing the negatively charged plate.

(d) Radiation produces its discharging effect even on non-conductors (ebonite and sulphur). With glass, resin and varnishes the action is feeble, or nearly nothing.

(e) If the experiment is made with a copper gauze and a zinc plate, the phenomenon nearly disappears on varnishing the gauze. His hypothesis is that radiation produces convection of negative electricity, the carriers being molecules of air.

(f) The carrying molecules move along the lines of force, and throw electric shadows. To show this he varnishes a zinc cylinder, all except a generating line, charges it negatively to 1,000 volts with a [Pg 128] dry pile, and places it parallel to a large earth-connected plane, which has a narrow rectangular portion insulated from the rest and communicating with an electrometer. Light only acts on the uncovered line of the cylinder, and on turning the cylinder round the electrometer is only deflected when it is exposed to some of the (circular) lines of force emanating from the active line of the cylinder.

(g) Radiation charges positively an insulated metal, even when it is an enclosure with walls of the same metal; the metal being certainly uncharged at the beginning of the experiment. The same occurs with sulphur and ebonite. If there is a feeble initial plus charge, radiation increases it.

(h) While the discharging power of radiation for negative electricity is strongest with zinc and aluminium, and slower with copper and gold, following the Volta series; the E.M.F. set up by radiation, when it charges things positively, is greatest with gold and carbon, and less with zinc and aluminium; again following the Volta series, but inversely.

(i) If radiation falls on an insulated metal plate connected with an electrometer, in an enclosure of the same metal, the positive electrification shown by the deflection of the electrometer is greater as the plate is further from the walls of the enclosure. The action stops when the metal has attained a certain electric density, constant for a given metal; so the potential of a plate is naturally higher as its capacity is less. It is thus established that radiation acts on the particles of gas in contact with a conductor; they go away with a negative charge, leaving plus on the conductor, until an electric density sufficient to balance this action is attained.

(j) It is probable that if the solar rays do not produce an effect it is because of the absorbing action of the atmosphere. In fact, if one places a tube whose ends are glazed with selenite between the source of light and the metals being experimented on, the effects become sensibly stronger when the tube is exhausted.

[Pg 129]

## APPENDIX VI.

ELLIPTICALLY POLARISED
ELECTRIC RADIATION.

Since the delivery of my lecture to the Royal Institution, on June 1st, Herr Zehnder has published[41] a mode of getting elliptically and circularly polarised electric radiation. He takes a couple of plane polarising grids, such as are depicted in Fig. 21, page 37, and places them parallel to each other at a little distance apart with their wires crossed.

If the two grids are close together they will act like wire-gauze, reflecting any kind of polarised radiation equally; but if the warp and woof are an eighth-wave length apart, and the plane of the incident radiation is at 45° to the wires, the reflected radiation will be circularly polarised. A change in the circumstances will, of course, make it elliptical. Such a pair of grids acts, in fact, like a Babinet’s Compensator.

[Pg 130]

## APPENDIX VII.

ON MAGNETISATION PRODUCED
BY HERTZIAN CURRENTS;
A MAGNETIC DIELECTRIC:[42]

BY M. BIRKELAND.

“Two years ago[43] it was proved by conclusive experiments that Hertzian waves travelling along an iron wire magnetise transversely the very thin layer into which the alternating current penetrates, and whose thickness does not exceed some thousandths of a millimetre. Once proved that alternate magnetisation can be produced with such rapidity, other questions present themselves. One asks, for instance, if it is not possible to demonstrate in magnetic cylinders stationary magnetic waves analogous to the electric stationary waves along metallic wires.”

The author finds that the conductivity of massive iron makes it an unsuitable substance, and uses instead a mixture of iron filings, or of chemically-obtained iron powder, with paraffin, to which he sometimes adds powdered quartz. This he moulds into cylinders, and inserts as the core of a spiral in an otherwise ordinary Hertz resonator.

Fig. 67 shows emitter and receiver drawn to scale; the magnetic cores are introduced into the spiral A, and their effect on the length of the resonator spark is observed. With this arrangement of exciter the electric effect of the spiral is negligible, since it is well removed from electrostatic disturbance, and subject only to magnetic. [Pg 131] The spiral is of 12 well-insulated turns, the spark gap is a micrometer with point and knob, and a pair of adjustable plates to vary the capacity for purposes of tuning.

He employed 12 different types of cylinder, all about 20 centimetres long, and 4 centimetres diameter.

1. A massive cylinder of soft iron.

2. A bundle of fine iron wires embedded in paraffin.

3-9. Six cylinders of the agglomerate of chemically-reduced iron in powder and paraffin, containing respectively 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 50 per cent. of iron.

Then for control experiments:—

10. A cylinder of agglomerate of zinc powder in paraffin, with 40 per cent. of zinc.

11. A cylinder of brass filings in paraffin, 20 per cent. of metal.

12. A tube of glass, 4·5 centimetres diameter, filled with various electrolytes.

Fig. 67.

The manner of observing was as follows (the experiments were done in the laboratory of Hertz):—

The resonator, with its spiral empty, was syntonised with the exciter, and the maximum spark measured. It was between 4 and 9 millimetres long in these experiments. Then one or other of the above cylinders was introduced and the spark length measured afresh. [Pg 132]

Cylinder 1 did not affect the maximum spark length. Cylinders 2-4 reduced the maximum spark to ⅒th of its former value; 7 and 8 to ¹/₁₀₀th, and No. 9 to ¹/₂₀₀th of its former value (viz., from 9 millimetres to ·05 millimetre). Nos. 10 and 11 had but a feeble action, and reduced the spark from 8 to 7 millimetres.

Tube No. 12, filled with distilled water, scarcely affected the spark length; the period of the secondary increases a little, but the maximum spark is the same as before, once syntony is re-established. Filled, however, with dilute sulphuric acid, containing 10, 20, or 30 per cent., the tube reduced the spark considerably, in each case about the same, viz., from 9 to 1·3 about. (Currents induced by Maxwellian radiation in electrolytes had been already observed by J. J. Thomson.)

While trying to re-establish syntony between primary and secondary, I found that the period of the resonator was considerably increased by the cylinders 2-4, but that the maximum spark length was much diminished. With the cylinders Nos. 5-9 in the spiral, it was no longer possible to establish syntony, “a fact which is certainly due to their considerable absorption of energy. Take, for example, cylinder 9: electromagnetic energy must converge rapidly towards it in order to be transformed, and the space finds itself empty of energy as air is exhausted of vapour in presence of an absorbing substance.”

“This absorption is probably due to hysteresis in the ferruginous cylinders; the development of Joulian heat, so typically shown by cylinder 12, being undoubtedly of the same order in cylinders 3-9 as in Nos. 10, 11.

“It is probably by reason of this absorption that I have not succeeded in establishing stationary magnetic waves in a circuit of ferro-paraffin.”

If one of the cylinders 2-9, is wrapped in tinned paper before introducing it into the spiral A, its action is completely stopped. (These conducting cores diminish the period of the resonator; it is much as if the spiral A were partially shunted out; but the maximum spark returns as soon as syntony is re-established.) To examine this further he enclosed the cylinder in drums of cardboard having fine wires either along generating lines, or along circular parallels. The latter suspended the action of an interior ferruginous cylinder, the former did not. [Pg 133]

To find to what depths the magnetism penetrated, Birkeland inserted hollow ferruginous drums into A, measured their effect, and then plunged solid cylinders into them to see whether the effect increased.

He thus found that the magnetisation easily traversed 7 millimetres thickness of the 10 per cent. ferro-paraffin, and 5 millimetres of the 25 per cent.

The substance is comparable to a dieletric on the theory of Poisson-Mossotti.

“The results obtained with our magnetic dielectric invite to new researches”—such as the mechanical force excited by electric waves on a delicately-suspended ferro-paraffin needle, and the rate of propagation of Maxwellian waves through such a substance.

Footnotes:

[1] Phil. Mag., XXVI., pp. 229, 230, August, 1888; or “Lightning Conductors and Lightning Guards,” pp. 104, 105; also Proc. Roy. Soc., Vol. 50, p. 27.

[2] Strictly speaking, in the waves themselves there is no lag or difference of phase between the electric and the magnetic vibrations; the difference exists in emitter or absorber, but not in the transmitting medium. True radiation of energy does not begin till about a quarter wave length from the source, and within that distance the initial quarter period difference of phase is obliterated.

[3] See Nature, Vol. XLI., p. 368, where I first described this experiment; or quotation in J. J. Thomson’s “Recent Researches,” p. 395.

[4] While preparing for the lecture it occurred to me to try, if possible during the lecture itself, some new experiments on the effect of light on negatively charged bits of rock and ice, because if the effect is not limited to metals it must be important in connection with atmospheric electricity. When Mr. Branly coated an aluminium plate with an insulating varnish, he found that its charge was able to soak in and out of the varnish during illumination (Comptes Rendus, Vol. CX., p. 898, 1890). Now the mountain tops of a negatively charged earth are exposed to very ultra-violet rays, and the air is a dielectric in which quiet up-carrying and sudden downpour of electricity could go on in a manner not very unlike the well-known behaviour of water vapour; and this perhaps may be the reason, or one of the reasons, why it is not unusual to experience a thunderstorm after a few fine days. I have now tried these experiments on such geological fragments as were handy, and find that many of them discharge negative electricity under the action of a naked arc, especially from the side of the specimens which was somewhat dusty, but that when wet they discharge much less rapidly, and when positively charged hardly at all. Ice and garden soil discharge negative electrification, too, under ultra-violet illumination, but not so quickly as limestone, mica schist, ferruginous quartz, clay, and some other specimens. Granite barely acts; it seems to insulate too well. The ice and soil were tried in their usual moist condition, but, when thoroughly dry, soil discharges quite rapidly. No rock tested was found to discharge as quickly as does a surface of perfectly bright metal, such as iron, but many discharged much more quickly than ordinary dull iron, and rather more quickly than when the bright iron surface was thinly oiled or wetted with water. To-day (June 5, 1894) I find that the leaves of Geranium discharge positive electrification five times as quickly as negative, under the action of an arc light, and that glass cuts the effect off while quartz transmits it. (For Elster and Geitel’s experiments, and those of Righi, see Appendices, p. 115 et seq.)

[5] See B. A. Report, 1884, pp. 502-519; or Phil. Mag., Vol. XIX., pp. 267-352.

[6] J. J. Thomson, “Recent Researches,” 344.

[7] Wied. Ann., XLVII., p. 77.

[8] FitzGerald, Nature, Vol. XLI., p. 295, and Vol. XLII., p. 172.

[9] Wied. Ann., 44, p. 74.

[10] Weid. Ann., 40, p. 399.

[11] Phil. Mag., Vol. XXXI., p. 223.

[12] E. Branly, Comptes Rendus, Vol. CXI., p. 785; and Vol. CXII., p. 90.

[13] Journal Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1890, Vol. XIX., pp. 352-4; or “Lightning Conductors and Lightning Guards,” pp. 382-4.

[14] See Phil. Mag., Jan., 1894, p. 94, where this explanation (whether true or not) was first given, and where the author first published his fuller experience of coherer behaviour.

[15] This statement has been absurdly misunderstood, as if it was a prediction of what would always be the limit of sensitiveness for any apparatus and any sized sender. Nothing of the kind was in my mind. Such predictions are always preposterous, and I am not obliged to those who imagined that I had been guilty of one of them.—O. J. L., 1899.

[16] FitzGerald tells me that he has succeeded with carbon also. My experience is that the less oxidisable the metal, the more sensitive and also the more troublesome is the detector. Mr. Robinson has now made me a hydrogen vacuum tube of brass filings, which beats the coherer for sensitiveness. July, 1894.

[17] Cf. Trouton, in Nature, Vol. 39, p. 393; and many optical experiments by Mr. Trouton, Vol. 40, p. 398. Since then the above described and depicted apparatus for electro-optic experiments has been imitated in a neat, compact form by Prof. J. Chunder Bose, of Calcutta, and with it he has obtained many admirable and interesting optical results. See Proc. Roy. Soc.

[18] Proc. Roy. Soc., 1879 and 1882.

[19] “Dimensional Properties of Matter,” Phil. Trans., 1879.

[20] Evening Lecture on “Dust,” by the writer, see Nature, Vol. 31, p. 265; also Journal of the Royal Institution, May, 1886.

[21] Apparatus for the purpose is now in the catalogue of Messrs. Ducretet, of Paris, but they supply a pair of combs of points. It makes a more interesting experiment if only one point is used, in a moderate space, and the electric supply regulated so as not to hurry the disappearance of the smoke too quickly, but to exhibit the stages of aggregation which precede the final disappearance by deposition. Any kind of smoke serves, but a bit of magnesium ribbon burnt under a bell jar is cleanly and effective. It should be looked at in a window or other good light, of course.

[22] Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers for 1890, pp. 352-4.

[23] “Modern Views,” second edition, p. 359.

[24] Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1890, p. 352. See also remarks by Mr. Stroh in two microphone discussions, Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1883 and 1887.

[25] Verbally to Section A at Bath, 1888. See also Phil. Mag., August, 1888, p. 229; and The Electrician, Vol. 21, pp. 607-8.

[26] Nature, Vols. 39 and 40.

[27] Nature, Vol. 41, p. 368; or, “Modern Views of Electricity,” second edition, p. 338. See also Fig. 4, p. 6.

[28] Nature, Vol. 41, p. 295; and Vol. 42, p. 172.

[29] Phil. Mag., March, 1891; also January, 1894.

[30] Wied. Ann., Vol. 40.

[31] Phil. Mag., January, 1894.

[32] Phil. Trans., 1897, A., communicated to the Royal Soc., June, 1896.

[33] Quoted in The Electrician “Notes,” October 1, 1897.

[34] Phil. Mag., May and July, 1897. He also shows electrical cohesion by an emulsion of oil and water, the two liquids, thoroughly shaken up, at once separating when exposed to strong electrical influence.

[35] A fact noticed by Bichat and Blondlot.

[36] In this apparatus the mercury amalgams of K and Na are run through a fine funnel, so that the freshly-formed surface of the drops may be illuminated. Under these circumstances, while pure mercury fell from -185 to -175 volts in 30sec., amalgam of zinc fell from -195 to -116 in 15sec., amalgam of sodium fell from -195 to 0 in 10sec., and an amalgam of potassium fell from -195 to 0 in 5sec.

[37] See Fig. 7, page 9.

[38] Corresponding to the activity of this gas as found by Wiedemann and Ebert (Wied. Ann., XXXIII., p. 258), in their researches on the influence of light on ease of sparking.

[39] See Fig. 13, p. 15.

[40] Comptes Rendus, vol. 107, p. 559.

[41] Berichte der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Freiburg i. B., Bd. IX. Heft 2, June 21, 1894.

[42] Abstracted from Comptes Rendus, June 11, 1894, and communicated by Dr. Oliver Lodge.

[43] Why two years ago? It was practically proved by Savart early in the century, and has been observed over and over again since. However, it is true that experiments have been more numerous and conclusive of late, and have been pushed to very high frequencies.—O. J. L.

Transcriber’s Notes:

The illustrations have been moved so that they do not break up paragraphs and so that they are next to the text they illustrate.

Typographical and punctuation errors have been silently corrected.

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SIGNALLING ACROSS SPACE WITHOUT WIRES ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be renamed.
Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
START: FULL LICENSE
THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license.
Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without charge with others.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

> This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.
1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works provided that:
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”
• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.
• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the work.
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
1.F.
1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.
1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.
Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.
Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.
The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.
The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.
While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.
International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility: www.gutenberg.org.
This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™, including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.