Metadata-Version: 1.1
Name: pytest-bdd
Version: 2.18.2
Summary: BDD for pytest
Home-page: https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-bdd
Author: Oleg Pidsadnyi, Anatoly Bubenkov and others
Author-email: oleg.pidsadnyi@gmail.com
License: MIT license
Description: BDD library for the py.test runner
        ==================================
        
        .. image:: http://img.shields.io/pypi/v/pytest-bdd.svg
           :target: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pytest-bdd
        .. image:: http://img.shields.io/coveralls/pytest-dev/pytest-bdd/master.svg
           :target: https://coveralls.io/r/pytest-dev/pytest-bdd
        .. image:: https://travis-ci.org/pytest-dev/pytest-bdd.svg?branch=master
            :target: https://travis-ci.org/pytest-dev/pytest-bdd
        .. image:: https://readthedocs.org/projects/pytest-bdd/badge/?version=latest
            :target: https://readthedocs.org/projects/pytest-bdd/?badge=latest
            :alt: Documentation Status
        
        pytest-bdd implements a subset of Gherkin language for the automation of the project
        requirements testing and easier behavioral driven development.
        
        Unlike many other BDD tools it doesn't require a separate runner and benefits from
        the power and flexibility of the pytest. It allows to unify your unit and functional
        tests, easier continuous integration server configuration and maximal reuse of the
        tests setup.
        
        Pytest fixtures written for the unit tests can be reused for the setup and actions
        mentioned in the feature steps with dependency injection, which allows a true BDD
        just-enough specification of the requirements without maintaining any context object
        containing the side effects of the Gherkin imperative declarations.
        
        .. _behave: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/behave
        .. _pytest-splinter: https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-splinter
        
        Install pytest-bdd
        ------------------
        
        ::
        
            pip install pytest-bdd
        
        
        Example
        -------
        
        An example test for a blog hosting software could look like this.
        Note that pytest-splinter_ is used to get the browser fixture.
        
        publish_article.feature:
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            Feature: Blog
                A site where you can publish your articles.
        
            Scenario: Publishing the article
                Given I'm an author user
                And I have an article
                When I go to the article page
                And I press the publish button
                Then I should not see the error message
                And the article should be published  # Note: will query the database
        
        Note that only one feature is allowed per feature file.
        
        test_publish_article.py:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            from pytest_bdd import scenario, given, when, then
        
            @scenario('publish_article.feature', 'Publishing the article')
            def test_publish():
                pass
        
        
            @given("I'm an author user")
            def author_user(auth, author):
                auth['user'] = author.user
        
        
            @given('I have an article')
            def article(author):
                return create_test_article(author=author)
        
        
            @when('I go to the article page')
            def go_to_article(article, browser):
                browser.visit(urljoin(browser.url, '/manage/articles/{0}/'.format(article.id)))
        
        
            @when('I press the publish button')
            def publish_article(browser):
                browser.find_by_css('button[name=publish]').first.click()
        
        
            @then('I should not see the error message')
            def no_error_message(browser):
                with pytest.raises(ElementDoesNotExist):
                    browser.find_by_css('.message.error').first
        
        
            @then('the article should be published')
            def article_is_published(article):
                article.refresh()  # Refresh the object in the SQLAlchemy session
                assert article.is_published
        
        
        Scenario decorator
        ------------------
        
        Scenario decorator can accept such optional keyword arguments:
        
        * ``encoding`` - decode content of feature file in specific encoding. UTF-8 is default.
        * ``example_converters`` - mapping to pass functions to convert example values provided in feature files.
        
        Function decorated with `scenario` decorator behaves like a normal test function,
        which will be executed after all scenario steps.
        You can consider it as a normal pytest test function, e.g. order fixtures there,
        call other functions and make assertions:
        
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            from pytest_bdd import scenario, given, when, then
        
            @scenario('publish_article.feature', 'Publishing the article')
            def test_publish(browser):
                assert article.title in browser.html
        
        
        Step aliases
        ------------
        
        Sometimes it is needed to declare the same fixtures or steps with the
        different names for better readability. In order to use the same step
        function with multiple step names simply decorate it multiple times:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            @given('I have an article')
            @given('there\'s an article')
            def article(author):
                return create_test_article(author=author)
        
        Note that the given step aliases are independent and will be executed
        when mentioned.
        
        For example if you associate your resource to some owner or not. Admin
        user can’t be an author of the article, but articles should have a
        default author.
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            Scenario: I'm the author
                Given I'm an author
                And I have an article
        
        
            Scenario: I'm the admin
                Given I'm the admin
                And there is an article
        
        
        Given step scope
        ----------------
        
        If you need your given step to be executed less than once per scenario (for example: once for module, session), you can
        pass optional ``scope`` argument:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            @given('I have an article', scope='session')
            def article(author):
                return create_test_article(author=author)
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            Scenario: I'm the author
                Given I'm an author
                And I have an article
        
        
            Scenario: I'm the admin
                Given I'm the admin
                And there is an article
        
        
        For this example, step function for 'I have an article' given step will be executed once even though there are 2
        scenarios using it.
        Note that for other step types, it makes no sense to have scope larger than 'function' (the default) as they represent
        an action (when step), and assertion (then step).
        
        
        Step arguments
        --------------
        
        Often it's possible to reuse steps giving them a parameter(s).
        This allows to have single implementation and multiple use, so less code.
        Also opens the possibility to use same step twice in single scenario and with different arguments!
        And even more, there are several types of step parameter parsers at your disposal
        (idea taken from behave_ implementation):
        
        .. _pypi_parse: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/parse
        .. _pypi_parse_type: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/parse_type
        
        **string** (the default)
            This is the default and can be considered as a `null` or `exact` parser. It parses no parameters
            and matches the step name by equality of strings.
        **parse** (based on: pypi_parse_)
            Provides a simple parser that replaces regular expressions for
            step parameters with a readable syntax like ``{param:Type}``.
            The syntax is inspired by the Python builtin ``string.format()``
            function.
            Step parameters must use the named fields syntax of pypi_parse_
            in step definitions. The named fields are extracted,
            optionally type converted and then used as step function arguments.
            Supports type conversions by using type converters passed via `extra_types`
        **cfparse** (extends: pypi_parse_, based on: pypi_parse_type_)
            Provides an extended parser with "Cardinality Field" (CF) support.
            Automatically creates missing type converters for related cardinality
            as long as a type converter for cardinality=1 is provided.
            Supports parse expressions like:
            * ``{values:Type+}`` (cardinality=1..N, many)
            * ``{values:Type*}`` (cardinality=0..N, many0)
            * ``{value:Type?}``  (cardinality=0..1, optional)
            Supports type conversions (as above).
        **re**
            This uses full regular expressions to parse the clause text. You will
            need to use named groups "(?P<name>...)" to define the variables pulled
            from the text and passed to your ``step()`` function.
            Type conversion can only be done via `converters` step decorator argument (see example below).
        
        The default parser is `string`, so just plain one-to-one match to the keyword definition.
        Parsers except `string`, as well as their optional arguments are specified like:
        
        for `cfparse` parser
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            from pytest_bdd import parsers
        
            @given(parsers.cfparse('there are {start:Number} cucumbers', extra_types=dict(Number=int)))
            def start_cucumbers(start):
                return dict(start=start, eat=0)
        
        for `re` parser
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            from pytest_bdd import parsers
        
            @given(parsers.re(r'there are (?P<start>\d+) cucumbers'), converters=dict(start=int))
            def start_cucumbers(start):
                return dict(start=start, eat=0)
        
        
        Example:
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            Scenario: Arguments for given, when, thens
                Given there are 5 cucumbers
        
                When I eat 3 cucumbers
                And I eat 2 cucumbers
        
                Then I should have 0 cucumbers
        
        
        The code will look like:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            import re
            from pytest_bdd import scenario, given, when, then, parsers
        
        
            @scenario('arguments.feature', 'Arguments for given, when, thens')
            def test_arguments():
                pass
        
        
            @given(parsers.parse('there are {start:d} cucumbers'))
            def start_cucumbers(start):
                return dict(start=start, eat=0)
        
        
            @when(parsers.parse('I eat {eat:d} cucumbers'))
            def eat_cucumbers(start_cucumbers, eat):
                start_cucumbers['eat'] += eat
        
        
            @then(parsers.parse('I should have {left:d} cucumbers'))
            def should_have_left_cucumbers(start_cucumbers, start, left):
                assert start_cucumbers['start'] == start
                assert start - start_cucumbers['eat'] == left
        
        Example code also shows possibility to pass argument converters which may be useful if you need to postprocess step
        arguments after the parser.
        
        You can implement your own step parser. It's interface is quite simple. The code can looks like:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            import re
        
            from pytest_bdd import given, parsers
        
            class MyParser(parsers.StepParser):
        
                """Custom parser."""
        
                def __init__(self, name, **kwargs):
                    """Compile regex."""
                    super(re, self).__init__(name)
                    self.regex = re.compile(re.sub('%(.+)%', '(?P<\1>.+)', self.name), **kwargs)
        
                def parse_arguments(self, name):
                    """Get step arguments.
        
                    :return: `dict` of step arguments
                    """
                    return self.regex.match(name).groupdict()
        
                def is_matching(self, name):
                    """Match given name with the step name."""
                    return bool(self.regex.match(name))
        
            @given(parsers.parse('there are %start% cucumbers'))
            def start_cucumbers(start):
                return dict(start=start, eat=0)
        
        Step arguments are fixtures as well!
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        
        Step arguments are injected into pytest `request` context as normal fixtures with the names equal to the names of the
        arguments. This opens a number of possibilies:
        
        * you can access step's argument as a fixture in other step function just by mentioning it as an argument (just like any othe pytest fixture)
        * if the name of the step argument clashes with existing fixture, it will be overridden by step's argument value; this way you can set/override the value for some fixture deeply inside of the fixture tree in a ad-hoc way by just choosing the proper name for the step argument.
        
        
        Override fixtures via given steps
        ---------------------------------
        
        Dependency injection is not a panacea if you have complex structure of your test setup data. Sometimes there's a need
        such a given step which would imperatively change the fixture only for certain test (scenario), while for other tests
        it will stay untouched. To allow this, special parameter `target_fixture` exists in the `given` decorator:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            from pytest_bdd import given
        
            @pytest.fixture
            def foo():
                return "foo"
        
        
            @given("I have injecting given", target_fixture="foo")
            def injecting_given():
                return "injected foo"
        
        
            @then('foo should be "injected foo"')
            def foo_is_foo(foo):
                assert foo == 'injected foo'
        
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            Scenario: Test given fixture injection
                Given I have injecting given
                Then foo should be "injected foo"
        
        In this example existing fixture `foo` will be overridden by given step `I have injecting given` only for scenario it's
        used in.
        
        
        Multiline steps
        ---------------
        
        As Gherkin, pytest-bdd supports multiline steps
        (aka `PyStrings <http://docs.behat.org/guides/1.gherkin.html#pystrings>`_).
        But in much cleaner and powerful way:
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            Scenario: Multiline step using sub indentation
                Given I have a step with:
                    Some
                    Extra
                    Lines
                Then the text should be parsed with correct indentation
        
        Step is considered as multiline one, if the **next** line(s) after it's first line, is indented relatively
        to the first line. The step name is then simply extended by adding futher lines with newlines.
        In the example above, the Given step name will be:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            'I have a step with:\nSome\nExtra\nLines'
        
        You can of course register step using full name (including the newlines), but it seems more practical to use
        step arguments and capture lines after first line (or some subset of them) into the argument:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            import re
        
            from pytest_bdd import given, then, scenario
        
        
            @scenario(
                'multiline.feature',
                'Multiline step using sub indentation',
            )
            def test_multiline():
                pass
        
        
            @given(parsers.parse('I have a step with:\n{text}'))
            def i_have_text(text):
                return text
        
        
            @then('the text should be parsed with correct indentation')
            def text_should_be_correct(i_have_text, text):
                assert i_have_text == text == 'Some\nExtra\nLines'
        
        Note that `then` step definition (`text_should_be_correct`) in this example uses `text` fixture which is provided
        by a a `given` step (`i_have_text`) argument with the same name (`text`). This possibility is described in
        the `Step arguments are fixtures as well!`_ section.
        
        
        Scenarios shortcut
        ------------------
        
        If you have relatively large set of feature files, it's boring to manually bind scenarios to the tests using the
        scenario decorator. Of course with the manual approach you get all the power to be able to additionally parametrize
        the test, give the test function a nice name, document it, etc, but in the majority of the cases you don't need that.
        Instead you want to bind `all` scenarios found in the `feature` folder(s) recursively automatically.
        For this - there's a `scenarios` helper.
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            from pytest_bdd import scenarios
        
            # assume 'features' subfolder is in this file's directory
            scenarios('features')
        
        That's all you need to do to bind all scenarios found in the `features` folder!
        Note that you can pass multiple paths, and those paths can be either feature files or feature folders.
        
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            from pytest_bdd import scenarios
        
            # pass multiple paths/files
            scenarios('features', 'other_features/some.feature', 'some_other_features')
        
        But what if you need to manually bind certain scenario, leaving others to be automatically bound?
        Just write your scenario in a `normal` way, but ensure you do it `BEFORE` the call of `scenarios` helper.
        
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            from pytest_bdd import scenario, scenarios
        
            @scenario('features/some.feature', 'Test something')
            def test_something():
                pass
        
            # assume 'features' subfolder is in this file's directory
            scenarios('features')
        
        In the example above `test_something` scenario binding will be kept manual, other scenarios found in the `features`
        folder will be bound automatically.
        
        
        Scenario outlines
        -----------------
        
        Scenarios can be parametrized to cover few cases. In Gherkin the variable
        templates are written using corner braces as <somevalue>.
        `Gherkin scenario outlines <http://docs.behat.org/guides/1.gherkin.html#scenario-outlines>`_ are supported by pytest-bdd
        exactly as it's described in be behave_ docs.
        
        Example:
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            Scenario Outline: Outlined given, when, thens
                Given there are <start> cucumbers
                When I eat <eat> cucumbers
                Then I should have <left> cucumbers
        
                Examples:
                | start | eat | left |
                |  12   |  5  |  7   |
        
        pytest-bdd feature file format also supports example tables in different way:
        
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            Scenario Outline: Outlined given, when, thens
                Given there are <start> cucumbers
                When I eat <eat> cucumbers
                Then I should have <left> cucumbers
        
                Examples: Vertical
                | start | 12 | 2 |
                | eat   | 5  | 1 |
                | left  | 7  | 1 |
        
        This form allows to have tables with lots of columns keeping the maximum text width predictable without significant
        readability change.
        
        The code will look like:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            from pytest_bdd import given, when, then, scenario
        
        
            @scenario(
                'outline.feature',
                'Outlined given, when, thens',
                example_converters=dict(start=int, eat=float, left=str)
            )
            def test_outlined():
                pass
        
        
            @given('there are <start> cucumbers')
            def start_cucumbers(start):
                assert isinstance(start, int)
                return dict(start=start)
        
        
            @when('I eat <eat> cucumbers')
            def eat_cucumbers(start_cucumbers, eat):
                assert isinstance(eat, float)
                start_cucumbers['eat'] = eat
        
        
            @then('I should have <left> cucumbers')
            def should_have_left_cucumbers(start_cucumbers, start, eat, left):
                assert isinstance(left, str)
                assert start - eat == int(left)
                assert start_cucumbers['start'] == start
                assert start_cucumbers['eat'] == eat
        
        Example code also shows possibility to pass example converters which may be useful if you need parameter types
        different than strings.
        
        
        Feature examples
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        
        It's possible to declare example table once for the whole feature, and it will be shared
        among all the scenarios of that feature:
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            Feature: Outline
        
                Examples:
                | start | eat | left |
                |  12   |  5  |  7   |
                |  5    |  4  |  1   |
        
                Scenario Outline: Eat cucumbers
                    Given there are <start> cucumbers
                    When I eat <eat> cucumbers
                    Then I should have <left> cucumbers
        
                Scenario Outline: Eat apples
                    Given there are <start> apples
                    When I eat <eat> apples
                    Then I should have <left> apples
        
        For some more complex case, you might want to parametrize on both levels: feature and scenario.
        This is allowed as long as parameter names do not clash:
        
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            Feature: Outline
        
                Examples:
                | start | eat | left |
                |  12   |  5  |  7   |
                |  5    |  4  |  1   |
        
                Scenario Outline: Eat fruits
                    Given there are <start> <fruits>
                    When I eat <eat> <fruits>
                    Then I should have <left> <fruits>
        
                    Examples:
                    | fruits  |
                    | oranges |
                    | apples  |
        
                Scenario Outline: Eat vegetables
                    Given there are <start> <vegetables>
                    When I eat <eat> <vegetables>
                    Then I should have <left> <vegetables>
        
                    Examples:
                    | vegetables |
                    | carrots    |
                    | tomatoes   |
        
        
        Combine scenario outline and pytest parametrization
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        
        It's also possible to parametrize the scenario on the python side.
        The reason for this is that it is sometimes not needed to mention example table for every scenario.
        
        The code will look like:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            import pytest
            from pytest_bdd import scenario, given, when, then
        
        
            # Here we use pytest to parametrize the test with the parameters table
            @pytest.mark.parametrize(
                ['start', 'eat', 'left'],
                [(12, 5, 7)])
            @scenario(
                'parametrized.feature',
                'Parametrized given, when, thens',
            )
            # Note that we should take the same arguments in the test function that we use
            # for the test parametrization either directly or indirectly (fixtures depend on them).
            def test_parametrized(start, eat, left):
                """We don't need to do anything here, everything will be managed by the scenario decorator."""
        
        
            @given('there are <start> cucumbers')
            def start_cucumbers(start):
                return dict(start=start)
        
        
            @when('I eat <eat> cucumbers')
            def eat_cucumbers(start_cucumbers, start, eat):
                start_cucumbers['eat'] = eat
        
        
            @then('I should have <left> cucumbers')
            def should_have_left_cucumbers(start_cucumbers, start, eat, left):
                assert start - eat == left
                assert start_cucumbers['start'] == start
                assert start_cucumbers['eat'] == eat
        
        With a parametrized.feature file:
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            Feature: parametrized
        
            Scenario: Parametrized given, when, thens
                Given there are <start> cucumbers
                When I eat <eat> cucumbers
                Then I should have <left> cucumbers
        
        
        The significant downside of this approach is inability to see the test table from the feature file.
        
        
        Organizing your scenarios
        -------------------------
        
        The more features and scenarios you have, the more important becomes the question about their organization.
        The things you can do (and that is also a recommended way):
        
        * organize your feature files in the folders by semantic groups:
        
        ::
        
            features
            │
            ├──frontend
            │  │
            │  └──auth
            │     │
            │     └──login.feature
            └──backend
               │
               └──auth
                  │
                  └──login.feature
        
        This looks fine, but how do you run tests only for certain feature?
        As pytest-bdd uses pytest, and bdd scenarios are actually normal tests. But test files
        are separate from the feature files, the mapping is up to developers, so the test files structure can look
        completely different:
        
        ::
        
            tests
            │
            └──functional
               │
               └──test_auth.py
                  │
                  └ """Authentication tests."""
                    from pytest_bdd import scenario
        
                    @scenario('frontend/auth/login.feature')
                    def test_logging_in_frontend():
                        pass
        
                    @scenario('backend/auth/login.feature')
                    def test_logging_in_backend():
                        pass
        
        
        For picking up tests to run we can use
        `tests selection <http://pytest.org/latest/usage.html#specifying-tests-selecting-tests>`_ technique. The problem is that
        you have to know how your tests are organized, knowing ony the feature files organization is not enough.
        `cucumber tags <https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber/wiki/Tags>`_ introduce standard way of categorizing your features
        and scenarios, which pytest-bdd supports. For example, we could have:
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            @login @backend
            Feature: Login
        
              @successful
              Scenario: Successful login
        
        
        pytest-bdd uses `pytest markers <http://pytest.org/latest/mark.html#mark>`_ as a `storage` of the tags for the given
        scenario test, so we can use standard test selection:
        
        .. code-block:: bash
        
            py.test -k "backend and login and successful"
        
        The feature and scenario markers are not different from standard pytest markers, and the `@` symbol is stripped out
        automatically to allow test selector expressions. If you want to have bdd-related tags to be distinguishable from the
        other test markers, use prefix like `bdd`.
        Note that if you use pytest `--strict` option, all bdd tags mentioned in the feature files should be also in the
        `markers` setting of the `pytest.ini` config. Also for tags please use names which are python-compartible variable
        names, eg starts with a non-number, underscore alphanumberic, etc. That way you can safely use tags for tests filtering.
        
        You can customize how hooks are converted to pytest marks by implementing the
        ``pytest_bdd_apply_tag`` hook and returning ``True`` from it:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
           def pytest_bdd_apply_tag(tag, function):
               if tag == 'todo':
                   marker = pytest.mark.skip(reason="Not implemented yet")
                   marker(function)
                   return True
               else:
                   # Fall back to pytest-bdd's default behavior
                   return None
        
        Test setup
        ----------
        
        Test setup is implemented within the Given section. Even though these steps
        are executed imperatively to apply possible side-effects, pytest-bdd is trying
        to benefit of the PyTest fixtures which is based on the dependency injection
        and makes the setup more declarative style.
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            @given('I have a beautiful article')
            def article():
                return Article(is_beautiful=True)
        
        This also declares a PyTest fixture "article" and any other step can depend on it.
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            Given I have a beautiful article
            When I publish this article
        
        When step is referring the article to publish it.
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            @when('I publish this article')
            def publish_article(article):
                article.publish()
        
        Many other BDD toolkits operate a global context and put the side effects there.
        This makes it very difficult to implement the steps, because the dependencies
        appear only as the side-effects in the run-time and not declared in the code.
        The publish article step has to trust that the article is already in the context,
        has to know the name of the attribute it is stored there, the type etc.
        
        In pytest-bdd you just declare an argument of the step function that it depends on
        and the PyTest will make sure to provide it.
        
        Still side effects can be applied in the imperative style by design of the BDD.
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            Given I have a beautiful article
            And my article is published
        
        Functional tests can reuse your fixture libraries created for the unit-tests and upgrade
        them by applying the side effects.
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            given('I have a beautiful article', fixture='article')
        
            @given('my article is published')
            def published_article(article):
                article.publish()
                return article
        
        This way side-effects were applied to our article and PyTest makes sure that all
        steps that require the "article" fixture will receive the same object. The value
        of the "published_article" and the "article" fixtures is the same object.
        
        Fixtures are evaluated only once within the PyTest scope and their values are cached.
        In case of Given steps and the step arguments mentioning the same given step makes
        no sense. It won't be executed second time.
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            Given I have a beautiful article
            And some other thing
            And I have a beautiful article  # Won't be executed, exception is raised
        
        
        pytest-bdd will raise an exception even in the case of the steps that use regular expression
        patterns to get arguments.
        
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            Given I have 1 cucumbers
            And I have 2 cucumbers  # Exception is raised
        
        Will raise an exception if the step is using the regular expression pattern.
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            @given(re.compile('I have (?P<n>\d+) cucumbers'))
            def cucumbers(n):
                return create_cucumbers(n)
        
        
        Backgrounds
        -----------
        
        It's often the case that to cover certain feature, you'll need multiple scenarios. And it's logical that the
        setup for those scenarios will have some common parts (if not equal). For this, there are `backgrounds`.
        pytest-bdd implements `Gherkin backgrounds <http://docs.behat.org/en/v2.5/guides/1.gherkin.html#backgrounds>`_ for
        features.
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            Feature: Multiple site support
        
              Background:
                Given a global administrator named "Greg"
                And a blog named "Greg's anti-tax rants"
                And a customer named "Wilson"
                And a blog named "Expensive Therapy" owned by "Wilson"
        
              Scenario: Wilson posts to his own blog
                Given I am logged in as Wilson
                When I try to post to "Expensive Therapy"
                Then I should see "Your article was published."
        
              Scenario: Greg posts to a client's blog
                Given I am logged in as Greg
                When I try to post to "Expensive Therapy"
                Then I should see "Your article was published."
        
        In this example, all steps from the background will be executed before all the scenario's own given
        steps, adding possibility to prepare some common setup for multiple scenarios in a single feature.
        About background best practices, please read
        `here <https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber/wiki/Background#good-practices-for-using-background>`_.
        
        .. NOTE:: There is only step "Given" should be used in "Background" section,
                  steps "When" and "Then" are prohibited, because their purpose are
                  related to actions and consuming outcomes, that is conflict with
                  "Background" aim - prepare system for tests or "put the system
                  in a known state" as "Given" does it.
                  The statement above is applied for strict Gherkin mode, which is
                  enabled by default.
        
        
        Reusing fixtures
        ----------------
        
        Sometimes scenarios define new names for the existing fixture that can be
        inherited (reused). For example, if we have pytest fixture:
        
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            @pytest.fixture
            def article():
               """Test article."""
               return Article()
        
        
        Then this fixture can be reused with other names using given():
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            given('I have beautiful article', fixture='article')
        
        This will be equivalent to:
        
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            @given('I have beautiful article')
            def i_have_an_article(article):
               """I have an article."""
               return article
        
        
        Reusing steps
        -------------
        
        It is possible to define some common steps in the parent conftest.py and
        simply expect them in the child test file.
        
        common_steps.feature:
        
        .. code-block:: gherkin
        
            Scenario: All steps are declared in the conftest
                Given I have a bar
                Then bar should have value "bar"
        
        conftest.py:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            from pytest_bdd import given, then
        
        
            @given('I have a bar')
            def bar():
                return 'bar'
        
        
            @then('bar should have value "bar"')
            def bar_is_bar(bar):
                assert bar == 'bar'
        
        test_common.py:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            @scenario('common_steps.feature', 'All steps are declared in the conftest')
            def test_conftest():
                pass
        
        There are no definitions of the steps in the test file. They were
        collected from the parent conftests.
        
        
        Using unicode in the feature files
        ----------------------------------
        
        As mentioned above, by default, utf-8 encoding is used for parsing feature files.
        For steps definition, you can both use unicode- and bytestrings equally.
        However, for argumented steps, if you need to use unicode symbols in it's regular expression, use `u` sign with regex:
        
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            @given(re.compile(u"у мене є рядок який містить '{0}'".format('(?P<content>.+)')))
            def there_is_a_string_with_content(content, string):
                """Create string with unicode content."""
                string['content'] = content
        
        
        Default steps
        -------------
        
        Here is the list of steps that are implemented inside of the pytest-bdd:
        
        given
            * trace - enters the `pdb` debugger via `pytest.set_trace()`
        when
            * trace - enters the `pdb` debugger via `pytest.set_trace()`
        then
            * trace - enters the `pdb` debugger via `pytest.set_trace()`
        
        
        Feature file paths
        ------------------
        
        By default, pytest-bdd will use current module's path as base path for
        finding feature files, but this behaviour can be changed by having
        fixture named ``pytestbdd_feature_base_dir`` which should return the
        new base path.
        
        test_publish_article.py:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            import pytest
            from pytest_bdd import scenario
        
        
            @pytest.fixture
            def pytestbdd_feature_base_dir():
                return '/home/user/projects/foo.bar/features'
        
        
            @scenario('publish_article.feature', 'Publishing the article')
            def test_publish():
                pass
        
        
        Avoid retyping the feature file name
        ------------------------------------
        
        If you want to avoid retyping the feature file name when defining your scenarios in a test file, use functools.partial.
        This will make your life much easier when defining multiple scenarios in a test file.
        
        For example:
        
        
        test_publish_article.py:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            from functools import partial
        
            import pytest_bdd
        
        
            scenario = partial(pytest_bdd.scenario, '/path/to/publish_article.feature')
        
        
            @scenario('Publishing the article')
            def test_publish():
                pass
        
        
            @scenario('Publishing the article as unprivileged user')
            def test_publish_unprivileged():
                pass
        
        
        You can learn more about `functools.partial <http://docs.python.org/2/library/functools.html#functools.partial>`_
        in the Python docs.
        
        
        Relax strict Gherkin language validation
        ----------------------------------------
        
        If your scenarios are not written in `proper` Gherkin language, e.g. they are more like textual scripts, then
        you might find it hard to use `pytest-bdd` as by default it validates the order of step types (given-when-then).
        To relax that validation, just override a fixture `pytestbdd_strict_gherkin` to return `False`:
        
        test_publish_article.py:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            import pytest
            from pytest_bdd import scenario
        
        
            @pytest.fixture
            def pytestbdd_strict_gherkin():
                return False
        
        
            @scenario('publish_article.feature', 'Publishing the article in a wierd way')
            def test_publish():
                pass
        
        
        Hooks
        -----
        
        pytest-bdd exposes several `pytest hooks <http://pytest.org/latest/plugins.html#well-specified-hooks>`_
        which might be helpful building useful reporting, visualization, etc on top of it:
        
        * pytest_bdd_before_scenario(request, feature, scenario) - Called before scenario is executed
        
        * pytest_bdd_after_scenario(request, feature, scenario) - Called after scenario is executed
          (even if one of steps has failed)
        
        * pytest_bdd_before_step(request, feature, scenario, step, step_func) - Called before step function
          is executed and it's arguments evaluated
        
        * pytest_bdd_before_step_call(request, feature, scenario, step, step_func, step_func_args) - Called before step
        * function is executed with evaluated arguments
        
        * pytest_bdd_after_step(request, feature, scenario, step, step_func, step_func_args) - Called after step function
          is successfully executed
        
        * pytest_bdd_step_error(request, feature, scenario, step, step_func, step_func_args, exception) - Called when step
          function failed to execute
        
        * pytest_bdd_step_validation_error(request, feature, scenario, step, step_func, step_func_args, exception) - Called
          when step failed to validate
        
        * pytest_bdd_step_func_lookup_error(request, feature, scenario, step, exception) - Called when step lookup failed
        
        
        Browser testing
        ---------------
        
        Tools recommended to use for browser testing:
        
        * pytest-splinter_ - pytest `splinter <http://splinter.cobrateam.info/>`_ integration for the real browser testing
        
        
        Reporting
        ---------
        
        It's important to have nice reporting out of your bdd tests. Cucumber introduced some kind of standard for
        `json format <https://www.relishapp.com/cucumber/cucumber/docs/json-output-formatter>`_
        which can be used for `this <https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Cucumber+Test+Result+Plugin>`_ jenkins
        plugin
        
        To have an output in json format:
        
        ::
        
            py.test --cucumberjson=<path to json report>
        
        
        To enable gherkin-formatted output on terminal, use
        
        ::
        
            py.test --gherkin-terminal-reporter
        
        
        Test code generation helpers
        ----------------------------
        
        For newcomers it's sometimes hard to write all needed test code without being frustrated.
        To simplify their life, simple code generator was implemented. It allows to create fully functional
        but of course empty tests and step definitions for given a feature file.
        It's done as a separate console script provided by pytest-bdd package:
        
        ::
        
            pytest-bdd generate <feature file name> .. <feature file nameN>
        
        It will print the generated code to the standard output so you can easily redirect it to the file:
        
        ::
        
            pytest-bdd generate features/some.feature > tests/functional/test_some.py
        
        
        Advanced code generation
        ------------------------
        
        For more experienced users, there's smart code generation/suggestion feature. It will only generate the
        test code which is not yet there, checking existing tests and step definitions the same way it's done during the
        test execution. The code suggestion tool is called via passing additional pytest arguments:
        
        ::
        
            py.test --generate-missing --feature features tests/functional
        
        The output will be like:
        
        ::
        
            ============================= test session starts ==============================
            platform linux2 -- Python 2.7.6 -- py-1.4.24 -- pytest-2.6.2
            plugins: xdist, pep8, cov, cache, bdd, bdd, bdd
            collected 2 items
        
            Scenario is not bound to any test: "Code is generated for scenarios which are not bound to any tests" in feature "Missing code generation" in /tmp/pytest-552/testdir/test_generate_missing0/tests/generation.feature
            --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        
            Step is not defined: "I have a custom bar" in scenario: "Code is generated for scenario steps which are not yet defined(implemented)" in feature "Missing code generation" in /tmp/pytest-552/testdir/test_generate_missing0/tests/generation.feature
            --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Please place the code above to the test file(s):
        
            @scenario('tests/generation.feature', 'Code is generated for scenarios which are not bound to any tests')
            def test_Code_is_generated_for_scenarios_which_are_not_bound_to_any_tests():
                """Code is generated for scenarios which are not bound to any tests."""
        
        
            @given('I have a custom bar')
            def I_have_a_custom_bar():
                """I have a custom bar."""
        
        As as side effect, the tool will validate the files for format errors, also some of the logic bugs, for example the
        ordering of the types of the steps.
        
        
        Migration of your tests from versions 0.x.x-1.x.x
        -------------------------------------------------
        
        In version 2.0.0, the backwards-incompartible change was introduced: scenario function can now only be used as a
        decorator. Reasons for that:
        
        * test code readability is much higher using normal python function syntax;
        * pytest-bdd internals are much cleaner and shorter when using single approach instead of supporting two;
        * after moving to parsing-on-import-time approach for feature files, it's not possible to detect whether it's a
          decorator more or not, so to support it along with functional approach there needed to be special parameter
          for that, which is also a backwards-incompartible change.
        
        To help users migrate to newer version, there's migration subcommand of the `pytest-bdd` console script:
        
        ::
        
            # run migration script
            pytest-bdd migrate <your test folder>
        
        Under the hood the script does the replacement from this:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            test_function = scenario('publish_article.feature', 'Publishing the article')
        
        to this:
        
        .. code-block:: python
        
            @scenario('publish_article.feature', 'Publishing the article')
            def test_function():
                pass
        
        
        License
        -------
        
        This software is licensed under the `MIT license <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License>`_.
        
        © 2013-2014 Oleg Pidsadnyi, Anatoly Bubenkov and others
        
        Authors
        =======
        
        `Oleg Pidsadnyi <oleg.pidsadnyi@gmail.com>`_
            original idea, initial implementation and further improvements
        `Anatoly Bubenkov <bubenkoff@gmail.com>`_
            key implementation idea and realization, many new features and improvements
        
        These people have contributed to `pytest-bdd`, in alphabetical order:
        
        * `Adam Coddington <me@adamcoddington.net>`_
        * `Albert-Jan Nijburg <albertjan@curit.com>`_
        * `Andrey Makhnach <andrey.makhnach@gmail.com>`_
        * `Aron Curzon <curzona@gmail.com>`_
        * `Dmitrijs Milajevs <dimazest@gmail.com>`_
        * `Florian Bruhin <me@the-compiler.org>`_
        * `Floris Bruynooghe <flub@devork.be>`_
        * `Harro van der Klauw <hvdklauw@gmail.com>`_
        * `Laurence Rowe <l@lrowe.co.uk>`_
        * `Leonardo Santagada <santagada@github.com>`_
        * `Robin Pedersen <ropez@github.com>`_
        * `Sergey Kraynev <sergejyit@gmail.com>`_
        
        Changelog
        =========
        
        2.18.2
        ------
        
        - Fix check for out section steps definitions for no strict gherkin feature
        
        2.18.1
        ------
        
        - Relay fixture results to recursive call of 'get_features' (coddingtonbear)
        
        2.18.0
        ------
        
        - Add gherkin terminal reporter (spinus + thedrow)
        
        2.17.2
        ------
        
        - Fix scenario lines containing an ``@`` being parsed as a tag. (The-Compiler)
        
        2.17.1
        ------
        
        - Add support for pytest 3.0
        
        2.17.0
        ------
        
        - Fix FixtureDef signature for newer pytest versions (The-Compiler)
        - Better error explanation for the steps defined outside of scenarios (olegpidsadnyi)
        - Add a ``pytest_bdd_apply_tag`` hook to customize handling of tags (The-Compiler)
        - Allow spaces in tag names. This can be useful when using the
          ``pytest_bdd_apply_tag`` hook with tags like ``@xfail: Some reason``.
        
        
        2.16.1
        ------
        
        - Cleaned up hooks of the plugin (olegpidsadnyi)
        - Fixed report serialization (olegpidsadnyi)
        
        
        2.16.0
        ------
        
        - Fixed deprecation warnings with pytest 2.8 (The-Compiler)
        - Fixed deprecation warnings with Python 3.5 (The-Compiler)
        
        2.15.0
        ------
        
        - Add examples data in the scenario report (bubenkoff)
        
        2.14.5
        ------
        
        - Properly parse feature description (bubenkoff)
        
        2.14.3
        ------
        
        - Avoid potentially random collection order for xdist compartibility (bubenkoff)
        
        2.14.1
        ------
        
        - Pass additional arguments to parsers (bubenkoff)
        
        2.14.0
        ------
        
        - Add validation check which prevents having multiple features in a single feature file (bubenkoff)
        
        2.13.1
        ------
        
        - Allow mixing feature example table with scenario example table (bubenkoff, olegpidsadnyi)
        
        2.13.0
        ------
        
        - Feature example table (bubenkoff, sureshvv)
        
        2.12.2
        ------
        
        - Make it possible to relax strict Gherkin scenario validation (bubenkoff)
        
        2.11.3
        ------
        
        - Fix minimal `six` version (bubenkoff, dustinfarris)
        
        2.11.1
        ------
        
        - Mention step type on step definition not found errors and in code generation (bubenkoff, lrowe)
        
        2.11.0
        ------
        
        - Prefix step definition fixture names to avoid name collisions (bubenkoff, lrowe)
        
        2.10.0
        ------
        
        - Make feature and scenario tags to be fully compartible with pytest markers (bubenkoff, kevinastone)
        
        2.9.1
        -----
        
        - Fixed FeatureError string representation to correctly support python3 (bubenkoff, lrowe)
        
        2.9.0
        -----
        
        - Added possibility to inject fixtures from given keywords (bubenkoff)
        
        2.8.0
        -----
        
        - Added hook before the step is executed with evaluated parameters (olegpidsadnyi)
        
        2.7.2
        -----
        
        - Correct base feature path lookup for python3 (bubenkoff)
        
        2.7.1
        -----
        
        - Allow to pass ``scope`` for ``given`` steps (bubenkoff, sureshvv)
        
        2.7.0
        -----
        
        - Implemented `scenarios` shortcut to automatically bind scenarios to tests (bubenkoff)
        
        2.6.2
        -----
        
        - Parse comments only in the begining of words (santagada)
        
        2.6.1
        -----
        
        - Correctly handle `pytest-bdd` command called without the subcommand under python3 (bubenkoff, spinus)
        - Pluggable parsers for step definitions (bubenkoff, spinus)
        
        2.5.3
        -----
        
        - Add after scenario hook, document both before and after scenario hooks (bubenkoff)
        
        2.5.2
        -----
        
        - Fix code generation steps ordering (bubenkoff)
        
        2.5.1
        -----
        
        - Fix error report serialization (olegpidsadnyi)
        
        2.5.0
        -----
        
        - Fix multiline steps in the Background section (bubenkoff, arpe)
        - Code cleanup (olegpidsadnyi)
        
        
        2.4.5
        -----
        
        - Fix unicode issue with scenario name (bubenkoff, aohontsev)
        
        2.4.3
        -----
        
        - Fix unicode regex argumented steps issue (bubenkoff, aohontsev)
        - Fix steps timings in the json reporting (bubenkoff)
        
        2.4.2
        -----
        
        - Recursion is fixed for the --generate-missing and the --feature parameters (bubenkoff)
        
        2.4.1
        -----
        
        - Better reporting of a not found scenario (bubenkoff)
        - Simple test code generation implemented (bubenkoff)
        - Correct timing values for cucumber json reporting (bubenkoff)
        - Validation/generation helpers (bubenkoff)
        
        2.4.0
        -----
        
        - Background support added (bubenkoff)
        - Fixed double collection of the conftest files if scenario decorator is used (ropez, bubenkoff)
        
        2.3.3
        -----
        
        - Added timings to the cucumber json report (bubenkoff)
        
        2.3.2
        -----
        
        - Fixed incorrect error message using e.argname instead of step.name (hvdklauw)
        
        2.3.1
        -----
        
        - Implemented cucumber tags support (bubenkoff)
        - Implemented cucumber json formatter (bubenkoff, albertjan)
        - Added 'trace' keyword (bubenkoff)
        
        2.1.2
        -----
        
        - Latest pytest compartibility fixes (bubenkoff)
        
        2.1.1
        -----
        
        - Bugfixes (bubenkoff)
        
        2.1.0
        -----
        
        - Implemented multiline steps (bubenkoff)
        
        2.0.1
        -----
        
        - Allow more than one parameter per step (bubenkoff)
        - Allow empty example values (bubenkoff)
        
        2.0.0
        -----
        
        - Pure pytest parametrization for scenario outlines (bubenkoff)
        - Argumented steps now support converters (transformations) (bubenkoff)
        - scenario supports only decorator form (bubenkoff)
        - Code generation refactoring and cleanup (bubenkoff)
        
        1.0.0
        -----
        
        - Implemented scenario outlines (bubenkoff)
        
        
        0.6.11
        ------
        
        - Fixed step arguments conflict with the fixtures having the same name (olegpidsadnyi)
        
        0.6.9
        -----
        
        - Implemented support of Gherkin "Feature:" (olegpidsadnyi)
        
        0.6.8
        -----
        
        - Implemented several hooks to allow reporting/error handling (bubenkoff)
        
        0.6.6
        -----
        
        - Fixes to unnecessary mentioning of pytest-bdd package files in py.test log with -v (bubenkoff)
        
        0.6.5
        -----
        
        - Compartibility with recent pytest (bubenkoff)
        
        0.6.4
        -----
        
        - More unicode fixes (amakhnach)
        
        0.6.3
        -----
        
        - Added unicode support for feature files. Removed buggy module replacement for scenario. (amakhnach)
        
        0.6.2
        -----
        
        - Removed unnecessary mention of pytest-bdd package files in py.test log with -v (bubenkoff)
        
        0.6.1
        -----
        
        - Step arguments in whens when there are no given arguments used. (amakhnach, bubenkoff)
        
        0.6.0
        -----
        
        - Added step arguments support. (curzona, olegpidsadnyi, bubenkoff)
        - Added checking of the step type order. (markon, olegpidsadnyi)
        
        0.5.2
        -----
        
        - Added extra info into output when FeatureError exception raises. (amakhnach)
        
        0.5.0
        -----
        
        - Added parametrization to scenarios
        - Coveralls.io integration
        - Test coverage improvement/fixes
        - Correct wrapping of step functions to preserve function docstring
        
        0.4.7
        -----
        
        - Fixed Python 3.3 support
        
        0.4.6
        -----
        
        - Fixed a bug when py.test --fixtures showed incorrect filenames for the steps.
        
        0.4.5
        -----
        
        - Fixed a bug with the reuse of the fixture by given steps being evaluated multiple times.
        
        0.4.3
        -----
        
        - Update the license file and PYPI related documentation.
        
Platform: UNKNOWN
Classifier: Development Status :: 6 - Mature
Classifier: Intended Audience :: Developers
Classifier: License :: OSI Approved :: MIT License
Classifier: Operating System :: POSIX
Classifier: Operating System :: Microsoft :: Windows
Classifier: Operating System :: MacOS :: MacOS X
Classifier: Topic :: Software Development :: Testing
Classifier: Topic :: Software Development :: Libraries
Classifier: Topic :: Utilities
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 2
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 2.7
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.0
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.1
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.2
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.3
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.4
